首页
登录
职称英语
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
游客
2025-04-25
24
管理
问题
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has violated the ethical standards of the research community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable obligation to act. At the most immediate level, misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one’s own research or the research of colleagues. 1)
More broadly, even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists and their institutions, which in turn can result in the imposition of counterproductive regulations, and shake public confidence in the integrity of science.
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is possible—but not always. Reprisals by the accused person and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past and have had serious consequences. 2)
Any allegation of misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the charge, the institutions involved, and science in general.
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research ethics usually has more options than are immediately apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. 3)
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, and other senior faculty call be invaluable sources of advice in deciding whether to go forward with a complaint.
An important consideration is deciding when to put a complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal manner than if it is made verbally. 4)
Putting a complaint in writing can have serious consequences for the career of a scientist and should be undertaken only after thorough consideration.
The National Science Foundation and Public Health Service require all research institutions that receive public funds to have procedures in place to deal with allegations of unethical practice. 5)
These procedures take into account fairness for the accused, protection for the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and requirements for confidentiality and disclosure.
In addition, many universities and other research institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics officer, or other official who is available to discuss situations involving research ethics. Such discussions are carried out in the strictest confidence whenever possible. Some institutions provide multiple entry points, so that complainants can go to a person with whom they feel comfortable. [br]
选项
答案
在大学里,对于是否进行控告这一问题,辅导教师、系主任及其他高级教师都可以对此给出宝贵的意见。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/4052867.html
相关试题推荐
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
随机试题
[img]2015m2s/ct_etoeiclm_etoeiclzp_0001_201516[/img][br][originaltext](A)He’s
网络出版服务单位违反行政法规和管理规定的,出版主管部门可以采取的行政措施有(
消防电话总机只能呼叫一部电话分机。
某场地地质作用影响程度为“强烈全新活动断裂带;对建筑抗震的危险地段;不良地质作用
人体体格测量是评价营养状况的综合观察指标。()是常用指标A.体重 B.身高
项目管理实施规划的编制依据,不包括()。A.技术经济指标 B.项目管
流行性脑脊髓膜炎的治疗首选A.青霉素B.氯霉素C.甲硝唑D.环丙沙星E.庆大霉素
下列关于不规则三角网TIN的说法中,错误的是( )。A.TIN模型除了存储顶点
根据“一鸟在手”股利理论,公司的股利政策应采用()。A.低股利支付率 B
已经连接接地极的保护铜导体,按热稳定校验选择的最小截面是95mm2,请确定铜导体
最新回复
(
0
)