首页
登录
职称英语
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career dipl
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career dipl
游客
2025-01-18
43
管理
问题
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplomat struck an optimistic note. Yes, China would probably soon overtake the United States as the world’s largest economy, he conceded, but the Middle Kingdom was unlikely to rival the United States anytime soon when it came to "soft power", or cultural influence and attractiveness.
Indeed, soft power is generally seen as a major asset in the foreign policy realm, helping countries achieve their goals without resorting to "hard power"—i.e.,
coercive
means. "Young people around the world," the diplomat confidently asserted, "still listen to American music, watch American movies and dream of coming to the United States."
Particularly in Latin America, that remains as true as ever, despite Donald Trump in the White House and a historic and irreversible shift of economic power away from the West towards Asia. The United States’ cultural influence and visibility stands unrivaled across Latin America. Chinese culture, by comparison, remains largely unknown and is usually met with indifference and a lack of interest. While some people are aware of China’s growing economic role in Latin America—it is already the largest trading partner of several of the region’s major economies, including Brazil, Chile and Peru—most would struggle to name a single Chinese contemporary singer, athlete or soap opera star. Latin America’s mass media busily reports even minor events in U.S. politics or cultural life, yet Chinese news remain the stuff of specialists.
Yet while U.S. soft power may provide some tangible economic benefits in Latin America—think of tourism to Disney World and New York, Netflix subscriptions and Starbucks sales—it has also shown to be a double-edged sword, particularly in the foreign policy realm. China’s
under-the-radar
approach in Latin America, by comparison, also brings important advantages, some of which may, paradoxically, be of greater strategic relevance in the long term. That is because, in a region traditionally concerned about U.S. meddling, strong cultural influence tends to inflate the perceived political and economic influence. While the United States’ de facto influence in Latin America has declined significantly over the past decade—partly due to China’s growing role in the region, but also because U.S. policymakers generally do not see the region as a priority—this change is barely reflected in the public debate, where the U.S. role remains outsized.
That often makes cooperating with the United States politically costly. When Brazil’s former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso reached, in 2000, a groundbreaking space cooperation deal with the United States, which would involve U.S. use of the Brazilian space agency’s launch site in Alcantara in Northern Brazil (its equatorial location allows reducing fuel costs of satellite launches by 30 percent), the opposition saw an opportunity to whip up anti-American nationalist sentiment by mischaracterizing the technology safeguards agreement (TSA) as a threat to Brazil’s sovereignty. Cardoso found himself accused of being an entreguista and canceled the project, which would have allowed Brazil to develop precious expertise in the area—increasingly important due to strong growth in the microsatellite sector crucial for GPS and internet communication. When the current government of Michel Temer took up the project recently, pressure again intensified, even though this time its successful conclusion is more likely. If the project partner had been China back then or today, it seems unlikely that the project would have faced as much political resistance.
This episode is starkly contrasted by how China can operate across Latin America and make strategic investments almost without any real concern for public opinion. When Chinese investors recently bought a third of Brazil’s electricity sector—a sector of tremendous strategic importance—the news barely made it to the front page of Brazilian newspapers. [br] According to the author, Donald Trump in the White House seems to be________to Latin America.
选项
A、promising
B、influential
C、surprising
D、unfavorable
答案
D
解析
细节题。根据题干关键词定位第3段第1句,从despite这个词可知,Donald Trump in me white House与主句构成让步关系,是美国在拉美软实力影响的不利因素,故正确答案为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3918532.html
相关试题推荐
Intheworldofsport,thefour-minutemile—the"dreammile"—untilrecentlywas
Priceshaverecentlyriseninorderto________theincreasedcostofrawmaterial
AtarecentdebateinWashingtonabouttheriseofChina,aU.S.careerdipl
AtarecentdebateinWashingtonabouttheriseofChina,aU.S.careerdipl
AtarecentdebateinWashingtonabouttheriseofChina,aU.S.careerdipl
AtarecentdebateinWashingtonabouttheriseofChina,aU.S.careerdipl
AtarecentdebateinWashingtonabouttheriseofChina,aU.S.careerdipl
WhenitrecentlyemergedthatGooglewashelpingthePentagonwiththeAIfora
Thenewlawrepresentsrecentandcurrentrequirementsfornewfoodadditivesan
下面你将听到一段有关应对未来经济挑战的讲话。[originaltext]Recentdatasuggestthatheadwindsc
随机试题
______isa20thcenturypoet.A、JohnDonneB、AlfredTennysonC、EmilyDickinsonD、
Ascientistwhowantstopredictthewayinwhichconsumerswillspendthei
土地勘测定界放样作业方法一般分为()等。A.勘丈法 B.前方交会法 C
A国的某银行有资产40000万美元,负债30000万美元,均为浮动利率型,后因市
药动学是研究A、药物的加工处理 B、机体对药物的处置过程 C、药物与机体间相
2020年我国货物进出口总额321557亿元,对“一带一路”沿线国家进出口总额9
“一心二用”是()。单选A.有条件的 B.任何时候都做不到 C.无条件
A.干扰素 B.胸腺肽 C.阿糖腺苷 D.金刚烷胺 E.膦甲酸钠不能与其
下列投标人的行为中,违反我国有关招标投标的法律规定的有()。A.甲公司借用
(2014真题)根据《建设工程工程量清单计价规范》GB50500-2013,关于
最新回复
(
0
)