首页
登录
职称英语
It’s a rough world out there. Step outside and you could break a leg slippin
It’s a rough world out there. Step outside and you could break a leg slippin
游客
2024-06-02
36
管理
问题
It’s a rough world out there. Step outside and you could break a leg slipping on your doormat. Light up the stove and you could burn down the house. Luckily, if the doormat or stove failed to warn of coming disaster, a successful lawsuit might compensate you for your troubles. Or so the thinking has gone since the early 1980s, when juries began holding more companies liable for their customers’ misfortunes.
Feeling threatened, companies responded by writing ever-longer warning labels, trying to anticipate every possible accident. Today, stepladders carry labels several inches long that warn, among other things, that you might — surprise! — fall off. The label on a child’s batman cape cautions that toy "does not enable user to fly".
While warnings are often appropriate and necessary — the dangers of drug interactions, for instance — and many are required by state or federal regulations, it isn’t clear that they actually protect the manufacturers and sellers from liability if a customer is injured. About 50 percent of the companies lose when injured customers take them to court.
Now the tide appears to be turning. As personal injury claims continue as before, some courts are beginning to side with defendants, especially in cases where a warning label probably wouldn’t have changed anything. In May, Julie Nimmons, president of Schutt Sportswear in Illinois, successfully fought a lawsuit involving a football player who was paralyzed in a game while wearing a Schutt helmet. "We’re really sorry he has become paralyzed, but helmets aren’t designed to prevent those kinds of injuries," says Nimmons. The jury agreed that the nature of the game, not the helmet, was the reason for the athlete’s injury. At the same time, the American Law Institute — a group of judges, lawyers, and academics whose recommendations carry substantial weight — issued new guidelines stating that companies need not warn customers of various dangers or bombard (轰炸) them with a lengthy list of possible ones. "Important information can get buries in a sea of trivialities." says a law professor at Comell Law School who helped draft the new guidelines. "The information on products might actually be provided for the benefit of customers and not as protection against legal liability." [br] Manufacturers mentioned in the passage were obliged to make the best of warning labels sb as to ______ .
选项
答案
avoid legal liability
解析
参见第二段第一句:日益增多的赔偿案令生产商备感威胁,他们便把商品标签上的警告写得很长,预计可能发生的任何一种意外,以逃避法律责任。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3617111.html
相关试题推荐
It’saroughworldoutthere.Stepoutsideandyoucouldbreakalegslippin
It’saroughworldoutthere.Stepoutsideandyoucouldbreakalegslippin
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
随机试题
Overtheyears,Disneylandhas【B1】______theunmistakablecharacteristicsofa
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopicPe
下列关于转送管辖的说法,错误的是( )。A.被转送的案件是属于特殊管辖的复议案
细菌性痢疾的主要病变部位是:()A.回盲部 B.右半结肠 C.乙状结
初产妇,28岁,因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产后1周,体温38.8℃,无腹痛,恶露正常无异味
食管癌常用的化疗治疗药物为:A.环磷酰胺 B.柔红霉素 C.顺铂 D.吉西
病人但卧不能坐,坐则晕眩,属A.哮病 B.肺胀 C.气胸 D.痰饮停肺
作为行政执法活动的统计执法检查,具有( )。A.严肃性、消极性和权威性 B.
幼儿萌萌午休时不睡觉还发出吵闹的声音,何老师把她关在厕所里,以免影响其他幼儿休息
案例六: 一般资料:求助者,男性,35岁,某公司业务经理。 案例介绍:求助者
最新回复
(
0
)