首页
登录
职称英语
It’s a rough world out there. Step outside and you could break a leg slippin
It’s a rough world out there. Step outside and you could break a leg slippin
游客
2024-06-02
46
管理
问题
It’s a rough world out there. Step outside and you could break a leg slipping on your doormat. Light up the stove and you could burn down the house. Luckily, if the doormat or stove failed to warn of coming disaster, a successful lawsuit might compensate you for your troubles. Or so the thinking has gone since the early 1980s, when juries began holding more companies liable for their customers’ misfortunes.
Feeling threatened, companies responded by writing ever-longer warning labels, trying to anticipate every possible accident. Today, stepladders carry labels several inches long that warn, among other things, that you might — surprise! — fall off. The label on a child’s batman cape cautions that toy "does not enable user to fly".
While warnings are often appropriate and necessary — the dangers of drug interactions, for instance — and many are required by state or federal regulations, it isn’t clear that they actually protect the manufacturers and sellers from liability if a customer is injured. About 50 percent of the companies lose when injured customers take them to court.
Now the tide appears to be turning. As personal injury claims continue as before, some courts are beginning to side with defendants, especially in cases where a warning label probably wouldn’t have changed anything. In May, Julie Nimmons, president of Schutt Sportswear in Illinois, successfully fought a lawsuit involving a football player who was paralyzed in a game while wearing a Schutt helmet. "We’re really sorry he has become paralyzed, but helmets aren’t designed to prevent those kinds of injuries," says Nimmons. The jury agreed that the nature of the game, not the helmet, was the reason for the athlete’s injury. At the same time, the American Law Institute — a group of judges, lawyers, and academics whose recommendations carry substantial weight — issued new guidelines stating that companies need not warn customers of various dangers or bombard (轰炸) them with a lengthy list of possible ones. "Important information can get buries in a sea of trivialities." says a law professor at Comell Law School who helped draft the new guidelines. "The information on products might actually be provided for the benefit of customers and not as protection against legal liability." [br] In the 1980s, when accidents happened, injured customers could ______ .
选项
答案
expect protection from law/from the legal system
解析
参见第一段最后两句:幸运的是,如果门垫或炉子没有标有关于可能发生的灾难的警示标签,一个成功的法律诉讼可帮你挽回损失——至少自20世纪80年代早期以来,人们一直持有这样的看法,当时陪审团开始判定厂商要为顾客的不幸负责。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3617110.html
相关试题推荐
It’saroughworldoutthere.Stepoutsideandyoucouldbreakalegslippin
It’saroughworldoutthere.Stepoutsideandyoucouldbreakalegslippin
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
[originaltext]M:Hithere.(19)Haveyouheardthatthecompanyiscuttingstaff?
随机试题
ClassifythefollowingdescriptionasrelatingtoAGreenseaweedsBBrownseawe
TheMexicaneconomywentoffacliffinthesecondthreemonthsof2009,wit
【考题三回顾】作为一名新的幼儿教师,你觉得怎样才能让孩子和家长都喜欢你?
A、B两根圆形输水管,管径相同,雷诺数相同,A管为热水,B管为冷水,则两管流量(
企业信息资源集成管理的核心是对企业()的集成。A.业务流 B.内部信息流 C
关于子宫内膜癌,下列说法不正确的是:()A.确诊依据分段诊刮 B.
男孩,10岁,确诊为1型糖尿病,应用短效胰岛素治疗,分3次于3餐前皮下注射。患儿
发布证券研究报告相关人员进行上市公司调研活动,应当符合的要求包括()。 Ⅰ.在
下列有关水泥的说法,不正确的是()。A:水泥受潮后,表面易结块,从而失去胶凝能力
下列抽样方法中,属于非概率抽样的是( )。A.判断抽样 B.分层抽样 C.
最新回复
(
0
)