[originaltext] [29/30] Patricia Pania never wanted to be a national public f

游客2024-02-12  6

问题  
[29/30] Patricia Pania never wanted to be a national public figure. All she wanted to be was a mother and homemaker. But her life was turned upside down when a motorist, distracted by his cell phone, ran a stop sign and crashed into the side of her car. The impact killed her 2-year-old daughter. Four months later, Pania reluctantly but courageously decided to try to educate the public and to [32] fight for laws to ban drivers from using cell phones while a car is moving. She wanted to save other children from what happened to her daughter. [31] In her first speech, Pania got off to a shaky start. She was visibly trembling and her voice was soft and uncertain. But as she got into her speech, a dramatic transformation took place. She stopped shaking and spoke with a strong voice. For the rest of her talk, she was a forceful and compelling speaker. She wanted everyone in the audience to know what she knew without having to learn it from a personal tragedy. Many in the audience were moved to tears and to action. In subsequent presentations, Pania gained reputation as a highly effective speaker. Her appearance on a talk show was broadcast three times, transmitting her message to over 14 million people. [32] Her campaign increased public awareness of the problem, and prompted over 300 cities and several states to consider restrictions on cell phone use.

选项 A、A motorist’s speeding.
B、Her running a stop sign.
C、Her lack of driving experience.
D、A motorist’s failure to concentrate.

答案 D

解析 What had led to Pania’s personal tragedy?
同上题,文章开头部分提到“一个司机因为开车打手机而撞到她的汽车”,说明是打手机分散了司机的注意力才导致了这起惨剧.由此看出,答案为D。注意:文章并未提到司机超速行驶,所以A错;B的动作是司机做出的,并非Pania;C文章始终未提到。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3443382.html
最新回复(0)