首页
登录
职称英语
TV Linked to Lower Marks[A]The effect of television on
TV Linked to Lower Marks[A]The effect of television on
游客
2024-01-29
29
管理
问题
TV Linked to Lower Marks
[A]The effect of television on children has been debated ever since the first sets were turned on. Now three new studies find that too much tube time can lower test scores, retard learning and even predict college performance. The reports appear in the July issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.
[B]In the first report, researchers studied the effect that having a TV in a child’ s bedroom can have on third graders. "We looked at the household media environment in relation to academic achievement on mathematics, reading and language arts tests," said study author Dina L. G. Borzekowski, an assistant professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
[C]Borzekowski and her colleague, Dr. Thomas Robinson of Stanford University, collected data on 386 third graders and their parents about how much TV the children watched, the number of TV sets, computers and video game consoles in the household and where they were. They also collected data on how much time the children spent using the different media, as well as the time spent doing homework and reading. The researchers found that the media in the household, where it is and how it is used can have a profound effect on learning. " We found that the household media environment has a very close association with performance on the different test scores," Borzekowski said.
[D]"A child who has a TV in his or her bedroom is likely to have a score that is eight points lower on a mathematics test compared to a child who doesn’ t have a TV in the bedroom," she noted. These children also scored lower on the reading and language arts tests. However, children who have access to a home computer are likely to have higher scores on each of the tests compared with children who don ’ t have access to a home computer, Borzekowski noted.
[E]The reasons why TV has this negative effect are not clear, Borzekowski said. "When there’ s TV in the bedroom, parents are less likely to have control over the content and the amount watched," Borzekowski said. "They are also unable to know how early or how late the set is on. This seems to be associated with kids’ performance on academic tests. " Borzekowski believes that content and the time the TV is on may be the primary reasons for its negative effect. " If the TV is in the family room, then parents can see the content of what children are watching," she said. " Parents can choose to sit alongside and watch, or turn the set off. A simple and straightforward, positive parenting strategy is to keep the TV out of the child’ s bedroom, or remove it if it’ s already there. "
[F]In the second report, Dr. Robert J. Hancox from the University of Otago in Dunedin, New Zealand, and his colleagues found, regardless of your intelligence or social background, if you watch a lot of TV during childhood, you are a lot less likely to have a college degree by your mid-20s. In their study, the researchers followed 1 ,037 people born in 1972 and 1973. Every two years, between the ages of 5 and 15, they were asked how much television they watched. The researchers found that those who watched the most television during these years had earned fewer degrees by the time they were 26. " We found that the more television the child had watched, the more likely they were to leave school without any qualifications," Hancox said in a prepared statement. " Those who watched little television had the best chance of going on to university and earning a degree. "
[G]Hancox’ s team found that watching TV at an early age had the most effect on graduating from college. " An interesting finding was that although teenage viewing was strongly linked to leaving school without any qualifications, it was earlier childhood viewing that had the greatest impact on getting a degree," he said. "This suggests that excessive television in younger children has a long-lasting adverse effect on educational performance.
[H]In the third paper, Frederick J. Zimmerman and Dr. Dimitri A. Christakis from the University of Washington report that, for very young children, watching TV can result in lower test scores in mathematics, reading recognition and reading comprehension. "We looked at how much television children watched before age 3 and then at ages 3 to 5," Zimmerman said. " We found that for children who watched a small amount of TV in the earlier years, there was considerable beneficial effect compared to children who watched a lot of TV. "
[I]For children aged 3 to 5, the effect was not as clear, Zimmerman said. "There were some beneficial effects of watching TV on reading, but no beneficial effects for math or vocabulary," he noted. "The worst pattern was to watch more than three hours of TV before age 3. Those kids had a significant disadvantage compared to the other kids. " "Parents should follow the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation, which is no TV for children under 2," Zimmerman said. " Personally, I feel the cutoff should be children under 3, because there is just not any good content for children under 3. "
[J]One expert believes that TV can have both positive and negative effects, but it all depends on what children are watching. " Content matters," said Deborah L. Linebarger, an assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania, who co-authored an accompanying editorial. "Educational content has been found to be related to performance on school readiness tests, higher grades when they are teenagers, whereas, non-educational content tends to be associated with lower academic performance. "
[K]Another expert agrees. "TV watching takes up space that could be used by more useful things," said Dr. Christopher P. Lucas, a clinical coordinator at the Early Childhood Evaluation and Treatment Program at the New York University Child Study Center. "TV is not necessarily toxic, but is some-thing that has to be done in moderation: something that balances the other needs of the child for healthy development. "
[L]Lucas puts the responsibility for how much TV kids watch and what they watch squarely on parents. "The amount of TV watching certainly has a link with the reduced amount of time reading or doing homework," he said. " The key is the amount of control parents have in limiting the amount of access. Get the TV out of the bedroom: be aware of what is being watched: limit the amount of TV watching. " [br] Lucas claims that parents should be responsible for supervising kids’ TV watching.
选项
答案
L
解析
题干大意:Lucas认为孩子看电视时父母应该负责监督孩子。由题干中的“parents should be responsible for supervising kids’TV watching”可以定位到文中L段第一句话。该句提到“Lucas认为父母应当对孩子看多长时间电视和看什么内容负责”,与题干相吻合。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3402560.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]W:Hey!Yougotanewtelevision!M:Yeah!Itwasdeliveredyeste
[originaltext]W:Hey!Yougotanewtelevision!M:Yeah!Itwasdeliveredyeste
TVLinkedtoLowerMarksA)Theeffectoftelevisiononc
TVLinkedtoLowerMarksA)Theeffectoftelevisiononc
TVLinkedtoLowerMarksA)Theeffectoftelevisiononc
TVLinkedtoLowerMarksA)Theeffectoftelevisiononc
TVLinkedtoLowerMarksA)Theeffectoftelevisiononc
TVLinkedtoLowerMarksA)Theeffectoftelevisiononc
TVLinkedtoLowerMarksA)Theeffectoftelevisiononc
TodayIwouldliketotellyouabouttheeffectsofoldageonhealth.Actua
随机试题
PROMPT:A、stepdownB、checkC、deceiveD、perplexE、bendB
Manystudentschoosetoattendschoolsoruniversitiesoutsidetheirhomeco
FoodwasteinSeattleisfinallymadeintoakindof[br][originaltext](11
当某项医疗服务需要量大,卫生资源充分,卫生服务利用率低时,应采取以下哪项措施A.
在制定项目质量计划时对实现既定目标的过程加以全面分析,估计到各种可能出现的障碍及
下列不属于长期资本流动的主要方式的是( )A.直接投资 B.间接投资 C.
解析:第一步,本题考查几何问题。 第二步,根据图2知BC=,对应在图1当中可以
我国不少城市是在采掘矿产资源基础上形成的工业城市,下列表述不准确的是()。
A公司是一家上市公司,该公司2016年和2017年的主要财务数据以及2018年的
(2016年真题)甲企业与其关联方签署了成本分摊协议,共同开发无形资产,并约定退
最新回复
(
0
)