首页
登录
职称英语
Consumer Demand and Development of Green CarsThe day automakers
Consumer Demand and Development of Green CarsThe day automakers
游客
2024-01-03
34
管理
问题
Consumer Demand and Development of Green Cars
The day automakers put the earth at the top of their agenda will go down in history. Reading this book, one gets the sense that day is coming, major automakers- still no
paragons
of environmentalism—have gotten the message that replacing the dirty internal-combustion engine is an urgent priority. With less than 5 percent of the world’s population, Americans produce 14 percent of all global warming carbon-dioxide gas. And car tailpipes pump out more than 30 percent of U. S. air pollution.
In his new book, Forward Drive-. The Race to Build "Clean" Cars for the Future, environmentalist Jim Motavalli concludes that capitalist competition is leading the way over government
mandates
to clean up that exhaust. Motavalli chronicles the movement for cleaner cars: the few visionaries and zealots building and driving home-built battery-powered cars; the divided giant automakers working tirelessly to develop clean cars while fighting regulatory efforts to require them; university researchers concluding studies; and the regulators trying to speed their adoption.
Forward Drive covers the technological advances of the hybrid and fuel-cell vehicles poised to take over from the internal-combustion engine. In some ways, Motavalli is an unlikely narrator. A self-vowed car nut who stumbled into a job editing E, the Enviromental Magazine, he seems biased on both sides of the issue. But ultimately,
that’s
what makes him best suited to tell this story.
Motoavalli’s concern for the environment is sincere, and his knowledge of cars is refreshingly accurate.
The most interesting passages follow his transformation from internal-combustion devotee to environmental auto cynic and battery-car zealot to hopeful future-car realist.
"It was disconcerting, to say the least, to learn that my hobby of collecting classic cars and my growing concern for the environment didn’t necessarily mesh," Motavalli writes. "The car has certainly been good to me, but I’m becoming
disenchanted
. "
In the preface, he noted that he set out to write a book critical of the auto industry for teaming up with major oil companies to block the development of clean cars. But when he dug in to do more research, he found a different story. Namely that automakers in Detroit, Japan, and Europe are in a heated race to start selling cars that are more environmentally correct.
(A)
Unfortunately, Motavalli glosses over issues of consumer demand.(B)
He never mentions that today’s electric cars and gasoline-electric hybrids cost far more than internal-combustion cars of equal or greater capability.(C)
He notes their utter dedication to their electric cars and implies that the rest of the buying public should simply be as enthusiastic, without addressing issues of price or various ways families use their cars.(D)
He strongly favors California’s mandate that 10 percent of all vehicles sold in the state be zero-emission-vehicle-battery or fuel-cell electrics, not hybrids—even though he writes, "Ultimately, vehicles halfheartedly designed to meet a mandate would fail in the marketplace. " And
he gives a short shift to the point
that clean cars do nothing to ease congestion and sprawl.
In a telephone interview, Motavalli concedes that technology is progressing faster than the book deadline allowed him to keep up with. If anything, automakers are working harder to develop hybrid-electrics. And mass-market hybrid-drive systems will likely first show up in the big sport utility vehicles that Motavalli rails against.
Nevertheless, he now believes that the automakers with the deepest pockets have the best chance of building better cars for tomorrow. "The new, clean cars will emerge not from a tinker’s garage, but from the well-funded research labs of the same big auto companies that initially fought their introduction," he says. [br] According to Paragraphs 2 and Paragraph 3, what can be inferred from what the major automakers have done for the environment?
选项
A、They have tried to produce clean cars.
B、They have worked with the researchers.
C、They have reduced the harmful gas.
D、They have enhanced the auto technology.
答案
A
解析
本题为事实信息题。题目问:根据第二、三段,大的汽车制造商为环境保护做了些什么?从“Motavalli chronicles the movement for cleaner cars:the few visionaries and zealotsbuilding and driving home—built battery—powered cars:the divided giant automakers workingtirelessly to develop clean cars while fighting regulatory efforts to require them”可知,汽车制造商将研发清洁汽车的行动载人编年史:几个幻想者和狂热者制造并开着自己制造的电池组汽车;有分歧的大汽车制造商不遗余力、孜孜不倦地研发清洁汽车。因为在四个选项中A最合题意,所以选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3331148.html
相关试题推荐
Bothsocialfactorsandthedevelopmentof【L31】________havebeenimpo
Bothsocialfactorsandthedevelopmentof【L31】________havebeenimpo
Bothsocialfactorsandthedevelopmentof【L31】________havebeenimpo
(Rarelyhas)atechnologicaldevelopment(had)asgreatan(impacton)societya
______importantdevelopmentoftheNeolithicagewasnotinthemanufactureof
"Piaget’sCognitiveDevelopmentTheory"ThefamousSwisspsychol
"Piaget’sCognitiveDevelopmentTheory"ThefamousSwisspsychol
"Piaget’sCognitiveDevelopmentTheory"ThefamousSwisspsychol
"Piaget’sCognitiveDevelopmentTheory"ThefamousSwisspsychol
"Piaget’sCognitiveDevelopmentTheory"ThefamousSwisspsychol
随机试题
Parentsoftenwonderwhattheirlittleonesareabsorbingfromthem.Forexa
A.8.00 B.5.66 C.2.83 D.2.00
关于洁净室内发尘量的来源,下列哪一项是正确的?A.主要来自设备 B.主要来自产
在Linux中,用户root在登录状态下,键入cd~命令并按下回车键后,该
有关形神合一不正确的是()A.因神以形为物质基础,故应先养形 B.守神全形
病毒包膜的主要成分是A:核酸、蛋白质、糖类B:核酸、酶类、脂质C:核酸、糖类
公众参与的价值在于提高项目的科学性和可行性。公众的环境健康是最重要的,任何一个新
牙防指导组派出一科研小组到某氟牙症流行地区调查流行状况及其影响因素。根据研究计划
(2018年真题)下列关于企业交易性金融资产会计处理的表述中,正确的有( )。
根据《建设工程监理规范》GB/T50319—2013,关于对安全生产管理监理工
最新回复
(
0
)