首页
登录
职称英语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric p
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric p
游客
2023-12-23
41
管理
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane. [br] The view-point of the EPA is ______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、controversial
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3298585.html
相关试题推荐
Manyoftheelectricandelectronicproductswepurchaseandconsumetodayarew
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,such
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,such
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,such
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,such
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,such
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,such
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asa
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asa
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asa
随机试题
Atthehotel,Iwastryingtoreadthedirectionstotherailwaystation,thatw
Onethingthetourbooksdon’ttellyouaboutLondonisthat2,000ofitsr
Sometimeago,aninterestingdiscoverywasmadeby【C1】______ontheAegeani
多潘立酮止吐的作用机制是()A.通过血脑屏障,阻断纹状体D受体 B.脑内
可致“首如裹”的邪气是A.风 B.寒 C.暑 D.湿 E.火
女性不孕原因排在首位的是A.不排卵 B.输卵管因素 C.慢性宫颈炎 D.卵
A型不良反应是指A.与血药浓度无关 B.不可预知 C.死亡率高 D.量变异
下列关于催收公积金个人住房不良贷款的说法,错误的是()。A.承办银行需协助
下列各项做法中,可以应对舞弊导致的重大错报风险的有()。A.选取以前年度未
根据下列材料,回答66-70题 甲单位是一家实行政府采购的事业单位,2016年
最新回复
(
0
)