首页
登录
职称英语
(1) On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel
(1) On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel
游客
2023-11-25
97
管理
问题
(1) On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first explosion was detonated. Hearing the sirens and seeing London’s emergency personnel respond to the bombings brought back vivid memories of the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
(2) People have not forgotten Sept. 11, 2001. Americans can still recall exactly where they were and what they were doing on that fateful day. But it’s understandable that some remember it as historical fact, lacking the painful impact and immediacy they originally felt. If we allow a dimming of purpose—to eliminate terrorism—these terrorist attacks in London serve as another chilling reminder that we’re still at war.
(3) Something constructive emerges from these tragic, horrible and unexplainable attacks. It is the message that we must remain vigilant in opposing an enemy who intentionally targets innocent civilians.
(4) Since Sept. 11, 2001, the civilized nations of the world have remained mostly united in opposing these despicable, wanton acts of terror. We have had some great successes in that effort. We have arrested perpetrators and plotters, and we have foiled planned attacks. We have reduced the power and scope of those who despise freedom and democracy.
(5) The effort must continue. As we learned Thursday—and in Madrid and Bali—the enemies of freedom have not lost their resolve. We must not lose ours.
(6) Ultimately, the only real defense from terrorist attacks is being able to find out about them in advance. Intelligence gathering has improved but needs to be even stronger, including consistently improving human intelligence and patrol. Police and ordinary citizens must be alert and encouraged to convey information.
(7) Once a terrorist incident does occur, there’s no such thing as a perfect response. By definition, a terrorist attack means people are being hurt or killed. But by studying the response to past attacks, we can better prepare to handle those in the future.
(8) London is one of the most secure cities in the world, steeped in years of dealing with terrorism. The city’s preparation and resolve was evident on Thursday. I am very impressed by London’s reaction to the bombings. Both the emergency personnel and the citizens seemed prepared. The first responders were rapid, well-directed, organized and professional, in accordance with obviously well-tested plans.
(9) As for the citizens, at least a dozen people told me in one way or another, "We knew this was going to happen; it was just a question of when."
(10) That is not only a realistic assessment; it also is a mindset that just might save lives. Political, business and community leaders are sometimes reluctant to talk about terrorism or stage drills to prepare their response because they don’t want to frighten or upset people. But that’s a mistake. People react to e-emergencies more effectively when they’re not shocked by them.
(11) Tony Blair and London Mayor Ken Livingstone have made preparedness a priority, and their efforts clearly paid off during Thursday’s response to the attacks.
(12) There’s another benefit to preparing for terrorism in advance. Part of the damage the terrorists hope to inflict is the emotional reaction in the wake of the destruction. The reason it’s called "terrorism" is that they want fear and its debilitating effects to linger long after the smoke has cleared.
(13) By preparing citizens for the possibility of a terrorist attack, leaders can help minimize the emotional response in the wake of the destruction.
(14) Finally, Thursday’s attacks demonstrate that we must remain committed to confronting and eliminating terrorism. There are those who assert that the efforts to eliminate terror are somehow provoking the terrorists. That is wrong. The terrorists have been attacking innocent people long before Sept. 11, 2001, or the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.
(15) Seeing Prime Minister Blair speak so forcefully, with President Bush, President Jacques Chirac and other world leaders right behind him, was encouraging. Let’s remember the unity the world shared after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
(16) Free nations can and will disagree. But let us always remember that free people must be steadfast and resilient in defending our way of life. [br] According to the passage, which of the following is NOT the way to defend terrorist attacks?
选项
A、Improving human intelligence and patrol.
B、Alerting police and citizens to terrorism.
C、Finding out terrorists before they attack.
D、Studying the response to past attacks.
答案
D
解析
根据题干中defend terrorist attacks定位到第6段。从第6段的内容不难看出,A、B、C三项的内容都有提到,而D项(研究对过去袭击所做出的反应)在第7段提到,是为恐怖袭击发生后做准备。不属于“防御”的范围,故选D。细节题,根据题干中的关键词定位到第6段后,逐一验证各选项内容,便可排除原文中没有提到的选项C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3217238.html
相关试题推荐
(1)OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotel
(1)OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotel
(1)OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotel
(1)OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotel
(1)OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotel
[originaltext]M:Iwastryingtothinkofcomparisons,butIwashavingareall
[originaltext]M:Iwastryingtothinkofcomparisons,butIwashavingareall
[originaltext]M:Iwastryingtothinkofcomparisons,butIwashavingareall
PASSAGEONEHavingtheTvariant.根据题目中的thechanceofasmokergettinglungcancer
[originaltext]M:Theconceptthatyoucanearnahighsalarywithouthavingac
随机试题
Inordertostudyefficiently(高效率地),youneedtohaveaplacethatisalway
Z理论对应的人性假设的主要观点是()A.来自不同文化背景的员工,其行为方式也不同
感动中国的刘洪安使用一级大豆油炸油条,引发良心餐饮的热潮,刘洪安的行为体现了社会
授权机构相同,同期在同一项目不同的路基工地试验室任试验员,属于同时受聘于两家以上
A.减少血氨形成 B.减少肠道氨形成 C.减少氨吸收 D.取代脑中假性神经
“独在异乡为异客,每逢佳节倍思亲。遥知兄弟登高处,遍插茱萸少一人。”这首诗中的“
CNNIC于2008年7月发表的《第22次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》显示,我
一般资料:张某,女性,17岁.,高三学生,住校。 案例介绍:张某原本学习认真,
基础心理学是研究()。 (A)正常成人心理现象的心理学基础学科 (B
某企业为增值税一般纳税人,2022年2月销售自产的货物,开具的普通发票上注明含税
最新回复
(
0
)