首页
登录
职称英语
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested i
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested i
游客
2023-11-06
56
管理
问题
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed a lawsuit (诉讼) in California claiming that the state’s ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test. (They believed, correctly, that IQ tests are a valid method of evaluating children for special education classes. ) The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child’s physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know &40out any child’s intellectual level, the better for the child in question. [br] The author believes that intelligence testing ______.
选项
A、may ease racial confrontation in the United States
B、can encourage black children to keep up with white children
C、may seriously aggravate racial discrimination in the United States
D、can help black parents make decisions about their children’s education
答案
A
解析
从常识来判断,美国白人一般都认为黑人等少数民族的孩子愚钝不可教,因此不能进入特殊教育班级。智商的测试可以让人们清楚儿童在学校成绩不好到底是智力的问题还是其他原因to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence,or whether some other factor is the cause,这样就有可能排除智力上的因素,所以对缓和种族冲突会有好处,能表达此意思的是选项A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3162525.html
相关试题推荐
Whytheaviationfuelismoreharmfultotheenvironmentthanothers?[br][ori
Marywasmuchkindertoheryoungestchildthanshewastotheothers,______,o
Agrowingnumberofschoolsareembracingthecomputertoreplacetraditiona
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedi
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedi
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedi
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedi
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
随机试题
Ihavewaitedforthirtyminutes;thatseemed______hourstome.A、manyB、verym
[img]2014m3x/ct_eyyjsbz2010a_eyyjsbd_0119_20133[/img][br]【D8】[originaltext]
[originaltext]Therearemanyexplanationofwhypeoplecatchcolds.Somesa
InAmericaalone,tippingisnowa$16billion-a-yearindustry.Consumersac
某商业银行选取过去250天的历史数据计算交易账户的风险价值(VaR)为。780万
国家对病原微生物实行分类管理,将病原微生物分为()类。对实验室实行分级管理,
以非法占有为目的,使用诈骗方法非法吸收公众存款的行为,以集资诈骗罪定罪处罚。以下
下列各项中,属于销售预测分析中的营销员判断法优点的有( )。A.用时短 B.比
股票分割后对股东权益总额、股东权益各项目的金额及相互间的比例没有影响,这与发放股
堆载预压不得使用()。A.黏土或砂黏土 B.碎石或卵石 C.饱和土或黄土
最新回复
(
0
)