首页
登录
职称英语
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested i
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested i
游客
2023-11-06
73
管理
问题
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed a lawsuit (诉讼) in California claiming that the state’s ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test. (They believed, correctly, that IQ tests are a valid method of evaluating children for special education classes. ) The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child’s physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know &40out any child’s intellectual level, the better for the child in question. [br] The author’s opinion of child adoption seems to be that ______.
选项
A、no rules whatsoever can be prescribed
B、white families should adopt black children
C、adoption should be based on IQ test results
D、cross-racial adoption is to be advocated
答案
D
解析
作者观点题。作者在提到儿童收养问题后指出“surely good will on the part of all of us is needed”,显然是在说“cross-racial adoption is to be advocated。”因此,D项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3162526.html
相关试题推荐
Marywasmuchkindertoheryoungestchildthanshewastotheothers,______,o
Peterbecameangryandsaidthat_____.A、hewastiredtolistentothemB、thelis
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedi
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedi
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedi
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
随机试题
______particularlyhappensontheQueen’sbirthday.A、TroopingtheColorB、TheEi
关于炎症的阐述,错误的是()A.炎症的特征性病变是渗出 B.炎症是机体对于
鸡血藤的功效是A.活血行气,祛风止痛 B.活血行气,凉血清心 C.活血定痛,
对业主方负责的主要管理部门投资控制工作任务分工正确的是()。A:参加评标及合同
断路器失灵保护是一种近后备保护,当元件断路器拒动时,该保护动作隔离故障点。
当需求曲线整体向右上方移动时,这表明()。A.需求增加 B.需求减少 C.
2010年北京市保险公司平均原保险保费收入比2009年( )。A.多1成 B
填土(方)路基,填方段内应事先找平,当地面坡度陡于()时,需修成台阶形式。
某患者经治疗后好转。入院第5天,患者突发呼吸困难、咳嗽、咳粉红色泡沫痰。查体:B
下列施工进度控制措施中,属于组织措施的有()A.组织进度计划的动态调整 B.
最新回复
(
0
)