首页
登录
职称英语
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in
游客
2023-08-14
44
管理
问题
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed lawsuit (诉讼) in California claiming that the state’s ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test (They believed, correctly, that IQ tests are a valid method of evaluating children for special education classes.) The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child’s physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know about any child’s intellectual level, the better for the child in question. [br] The author’s opinion of child adoption seems to be that______.
选项
A、no rules whatsoever can be prescribed
B、white families should adopt black children
C、adoption should be based on IQ test results
D、cross-racial adoption is to be advocated
答案
A
解析
根据文章第7段末句“因此,很难说到底怎样才是最好的。但肯定无疑的是,我们大家都需要有善意”,由此可推断,人们并不能制定某种规则来限制它,故此,A与文章的意思相符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/2924548.html
相关试题推荐
Afterdecadesofdecline,theshareofmotherswhostayhomewiththeirchil
Afterdecadesofdecline,theshareofmotherswhostayhomewiththeirchil
Afterdecadesofdecline,theshareofmotherswhostayhomewiththeirchil
Afterdecadesofdecline,theshareofmotherswhostayhomewiththeirchil
[originaltext]MostschoolsintheUnitedStatesreceivemoneyfromfederal
[originaltext]MostschoolsintheUnitedStatesreceivemoneyfromfederal
I’minterestedinthecriminal【B1】______systemofourcountry.Itseemstom
I’minterestedinthecriminal【B1】______systemofourcountry.Itseemstom
I’minterestedinthecriminal【B1】______systemofourcountry.Itseemstom
I’minterestedinthecriminal【B1】______systemofourcountry.Itseemstom
随机试题
CultureShockI.CultureshockPeoplehavedifficultyin(1)_____toanewcultur
Nomodernindustrialenterprisecan______foramomentwithoutrulesandsetpr
在社区调查中,抽样调查必须遵循的一个原则是随机性。()
下列治疗哪一项是错误的( )A.黄体功能不全--补充孕激素 B.育龄期功血内
关于渗漉法论述不正确的是A.以不同浓度的乙醇为溶剂 B.属于动态浸提方法,提取
正常成年人的造血组织是A.脊椎骨、髂骨、肋骨、胸骨、颅骨及长骨近端骨骺处骨髓
A.如上图所示 B.如上图所示 C.如上图所示 D.如上图所示
根据表1,下列表述不正确的是( )A.高低工资行业之间职工工资的差额
医学科学证明,如果人的大脑皮层受损,就会丧失思维能力,没有意识,这说明()。
(2020年真题)从事生产经营的个人取得的下列所得中,应按照“经营所得”项目计征
最新回复
(
0
)