首页
登录
职称英语
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the que
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the que
游客
2025-05-27
8
管理
问题
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page.
For each question(15-20), mark one letter(A, B, C or D)on your Answer Sheet.
Recruitment Process Outsourcing
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO— has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expectations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adjunct to an organisation’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s)with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategies, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors— their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid " nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategic improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels. [br] What can we learn about Recruitment Process Outsourcing in the first paragraph?
选项
A、All companies tend to outsource their not so important services.
B、It gained wide acceptance among the employers as soon as it came out.
C、Recruiting is an important department of many organisations.
D、It took a long time before RPO finally became popular.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段提到“Recruitment Process Outsourcing--better known as RPO--hasgained significant market momentum in recent years.Yet it has taken a while.”即:招聘流程外包在近几年赢得了很好的发展势头,但是这个过程也花费了一段时间。所以,D项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/4092254.html
相关试题推荐
ReadthearticlebelowabouttheImportanceoftheofficeenvironment.For
ReadthearticlebelowabouttheImportanceoftheofficeenvironment.For
ReadthearticlebelowabouttheImportanceoftheofficeenvironment.For
ReadthearticlebelowabouttheImportanceoftheofficeenvironment.For
ReadthearticlebelowabouttheImportanceoftheofficeenvironment.For
Readthearticlebelowaboutanattempttobuypartofacompany.Chooset
Readthearticlebelowaboutanattempttobuypartofacompany.Chooset
Readthearticlebelowaboutanattempttobuypartofacompany.Chooset
Readthearticlebelowaboutanattempttobuypartofacompany.Chooset
Readthearticlebelowaboutanattempttobuypartofacompany.Chooset
随机试题
•Readthearticlebelowaboutsuccessfule-mailnegotiation.•Choosethebestse
Oneofthebiggestchangessince1990isthedegreetowhichbioterrorismha
[originaltext]M:Aren’tyouevenalittlebitdisappointedthatyoudidn’tget
Thisarticleismainlyabouthowtokeephealthythroughfoodandexercises.[b
[originaltext]ThefarmeconomyoftheUnitedStateshaschangedalotinti
下列属于商业银行等金融机构流动性风险预警的融资指标信号的有()。 ①融资成本
各种运输方式内外部的各个方面的构成和联系,就是( )。 A.运输系统
16岁的甲与13岁的乙是好朋友,均为中学生。某日二人在住宅小区中玩耍,一辆某快餐
为了保证项目具有较高的区分度,项目得分最好呈现()。 (A)峰态分布(B)
下列关于报关单位分类管理的表述,正确的是:A.A类报关企业代理B类进出口货物收发
最新回复
(
0
)