首页
登录
职称英语
Reforming the Social Security retirement program is an issue of enormous pra
Reforming the Social Security retirement program is an issue of enormous pra
游客
2025-05-08
38
管理
问题
Reforming the Social Security retirement program is an issue of enormous practical importance. Yet it remains the missing piece in American policy analysis. At a time when the Congress and the Administration are considering ways to reform welfare, Medicare, Medicaid, and the income tax, elected officials are still unwilling to confront the serious problems of our Social Security system. Eventually, however, its deteriorating financial condition will force major reforms. Whether those reforms are good or bad, whether they deal with the basic economic problems of the system or merely protect the solvency of existing institutional arrangements will depend in part on whether we, as economists, provide the appropriate intellectual framework for analyzing reform alternatives.
Major policy changes that affect the public at large can only happen in our democracy when there is widespread public support for the new direction of policy. In the field of economics, the views of the media, of other private-sector opinion leaders, and of politicians and their advisers, depend very much on their perception of what economists believe feasible and correct. Fundamental policy reforms in a complex area like social security also require the development of technical expertise, both in and out of government, about the options for change and their likely consequences. Fortunately, an expanding group of economists is now thinking and writing about social security reform. My remarks today greatly benefit from what they have written and from my conversations with many of them.
I began to do my research on the effects of Social Security reform nearly 25 year ago [Feldstein, 1974, 1975]. A central concept in my analysis of Social Security has been the notion of "Social Security wealth," which I defined as the present actuarial value of the Social Security benefits to which the current adult population will be entitled at age 65 [or are already entitled to if they are older than 65] minus the present actuarial value of the Social Security taxes that they will pay before reaching that age. Social Security wealth has now grown to about $11 trillion or more than 1.5 times GDP. Since this is equivalent to more than $50000 for every adult in the country, the value of Social Security wealth substantially exceeds all other assets for the vast majority of American households. In the aggregate, Social Security wealth exceeds three-fourths of all private financial wealth, as conventionally measured.
Social Security wealth is of course not real wealth but only a claim on current and future taxpayers. Instead of labeling this key magnitude "Social Security wealth," I could have called it the nation’s "Social Security liability." Like ordinary government debt, Social Security wealth has the power to crowd out private capital accumulation; and Social Security wealth will continue to grow as long as our current system remains unchanged, displacing an ever larger stock of capital.
The $11 trillion Social Security liability is three times as large as the official national debt. Although I certainly welcome the current political efforts to shrink future budget deficits, it is worth noting that, even if the traditional deficit is eliminated in the year 2002, so that the national debt is then no longer increasing, the national debt in the form of the Social Security liability is likely to increase that year by about $ 300 billion.
Looking further into the future, the aggregate Social Security liability will grow as the population expands, as it become relatively older, and as income rises. Government actuaries predict that, under existing law, the tax rate required to pay each year’s Social Security benefit will rise over the next 50 years from the present level of slightly less than 12 percent to more than 18 percent, and perhaps to as much as 23 percent. [br] The deteriorating financial condition referred to was caused by ______.
选项
A、a poor economic approach to the Social Security retirement program.
B、the reform of welfare.
C、major policy changes
D、government debt.
E、all of the abov
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/4066720.html
相关试题推荐
NowadayswecanseeAmericanfilmsandTVprogramspouringin,fastfoodres
Thus,______wouldSocialSecuritytrustfundinvestmentsinstocksnotperform
Thetravelagencyhasafullprogramof______,iftouristswishtovisitlocal
TheMayoraskedthecitycounciltorecommendpotentialprogramsforthebenefit
ThereisalargejointprogrammeofdevelopmentamongleadingUScomputercompan
ReformingtheSocialSecurityretirementprogramisanissueofenormouspra
ReformingtheSocialSecurityretirementprogramisanissueofenormouspra
ReformingtheSocialSecurityretirementprogramisanissueofenormouspra
ReformingtheSocialSecurityretirementprogramisanissueofenormouspra
TheSocialSecurityActdidnotincludehealthinsurancebecausethecommission
随机试题
【B1】[br]【B3】A、loseB、lostC、looseB本题考查词义辨析。lose意为“丢失”;loose意为“松的;松散的;自由的”;此处应
IntheUSA,85%ofthepopulationovertheageof21approveofthedeathpe
MichaelWeschisaculturalanthropologyprofessorwhoexplorestheeffects
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedin
下列因素与散射线含有率有关的是A.滤线栅 B.X线胶片 C.X线波长 D.
关于借款合同的变更与解除,下列说法错误的是( )。A.借款合同依法需要变更的,
下列投资方案经济效果评价指标中,可用于偿债能力分析的有( )。 A、利息备付
D本题可以采用逆向思维的方式来解题,将右侧的四个图形按照左侧的小图形划分,可知,D项:
脾梗塞 A.凝固性坏死B.固缩坏死C.干酪性坏死 D.坏疽E.液化性坏死
BRMS主要用于评定()。A:抑郁状态 B:焦虑状态 C:恐惧状态 D:躁
最新回复
(
0
)