首页
登录
职称英语
For the longest time, I couldn’t get worked up about privacy: my right to it
For the longest time, I couldn’t get worked up about privacy: my right to it
游客
2025-05-07
26
管理
问题
For the longest time, I couldn’t get worked up about privacy: my right to it; how it’s dying; how we’re headed for an even more wired, underregulated, overintrusive, privacy-deprived planet.
I should also point out that as news director for Pathfinder, Time Inc.’s mega info mall,and a guy who makes his living on the Web, I know better than most people that we’re hurtling toward an even more intrusive world. We’re all being watched by computers whenever we visit Websites; by the mere act of "browsing" (it sounds so passive!) we’re going public in a way that was unimaginable a decade ago. I know this because I’m a watcher too. When people come to my Website, without ever knowing their names, I can peer over their shoulders, recording what they look at, timing how long they stay on a particular page, following them around Pathfinder’s sprawling offerings.
None of this would bother me in the least, I suspect, if a few years ago, my phone, like Marley’s ghost, hadn’t given me a glimpse of the nightmares to come. On Thanksgiving weekend in 1995, someone (presumably a critic of a book my wife and I had just written about computer hackers) forwarded my home telephone number to an out-of-state answering machine, where unsuspecting callers trying to reach me heard a male voice identify himself as me and say some extremely rude things. Then, with typical hacker aplomb, the prankster asked people to leave their messages (which to my surprise many callers, including my mother, did). This went on for several days until my wife and I figured out that something was wrong ("Hey...why hasn’t the phone rung since Wednesday?") and got our phone service restored.
It seemed funny at first, and it gave us a swell story to tell on our book tour. But the interloper who seized our telephone line continued to hit us even after the tour ended. And hit us again and again for the next six months. The phone company seemed powerless. Its security folks moved us to one unlisted number after another, half a dozen times. They put special pin codes in place. They put traces on the line. But the troublemaker kept breaking through.
If our hacker had been truly evil and omnipotent as only fictional movie hackers are, there would probably have been even worse ways he could have threatened my privacy. He could have sabotaged my credit rating. He could have eavesdropped on my telephone conversations or siphoned off my e-mail. He could have called in my mortgage, discontinued my health insurance or obliterated my Social Security number. Like Sandra Bullock in the Net, I could have been a digital untouchable, wandering the planet without a connection to the rest of humanity. (Although if I didn’t have to pay back school loans, it might be worth it. Just a thought. )
Still, I remember feeling violated at the time and as powerless as a minnow in a flash flood. Someone was invading my private space—my family’s private space—and there was nothing I or the authorities could do. It was as close to a technological epiphany as I have ever been. And as I watched my personal digital hell unfold, it struck me that our privacy—mine and yours—has already disappeared, not in one Big Brotherly blitzkrieg but in Little Brotherly moments, bit by bit.
Losing control of your telephone, of course, is the least of it. After all, most of us voluntarily give out our phone number and address when we allow ourselves to be listed in the White Pages. Most of us go a lot further than that. We register our whereabouts whenever we put a bank card in an ATM machine or drive through an E-Z Pass lane on the highway. We submit to being photographed every day—20 times a day on average if you live or work in New York City—by surveillance cameras. We make public our interests and our purchasing habits every time we shop by mail order or visit a commercial Website. [br] Because of advances in today’s technology, the right to privacy could be compromised in the following areas EXCEPT______.
选项
A、purchasing
B、banking
C、telephone use
D、recruitment
答案
D
解析
细节题。根据文中的内容可知,在购物、取款和使用电话时隐私权都会受到侵害,只有D项“征募新兵”未曾提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/4065252.html
相关试题推荐
Forthelongesttime,Icouldn’tgetworkedupaboutprivacy:myrighttoit
Forthelongesttime,Icouldn’tgetworkedupaboutprivacy:myrighttoit
Forthelongesttime,Icouldn’tgetworkedupaboutprivacy:myrighttoit
Atlastthegirlcouldn’tbeartheself-reproach,soshedecidedto______thef
HeworkedasabuilderinLondonand______halfhismonthlywagetohisfamily
Tobe______Icouldn’tunderstandwhathewasgettingat.Ifyouwantedtoknow
Ifyoucouldn’tattendeitheroftheconcertsandare______gnashingyourteeth
Billcouldn’t______ananswerwhentheteacheraskedhimwhyhewaslate.A、come
Thisisthe(longest)flightI(haveevertaken).BythetimewegettoLosAnge
Hecouldn’tlieconvincinglyenoughtotakeachild______.A、awayB、downC、inD、u
随机试题
Welovepeace,yetwearenotthekindofpeople____________(屈服于军事威胁).toyieldt
WhichoneofthefollowingisINCORRECT?[br][originaltext](9)TheItalian
Thefinancial,manufacturingandtransportationcenteroftheUnitedStatesisA、
WhichofthefollowingdetailsabouttheOlympicsisCORRECT?A、TheOlympicGames
ThesurveysofERShelplow-incomehouseholdsdevelopeconomizingpractices.[br
依据图中文字说明判别下列哪些自动喷水灭火系统是错误的?()A. B. C
依据《混凝土外加剂允质性试验方法》(GB8077-2012)标准,火焰光度法则试
关于片剂的常规检查,下列说法中不正确的是A.片剂的一般检查包括外观、重量差异及崩
沈老师在指导新教师时说:“学习和掌握幼儿身心发展规律、年龄特点,对做好工作极为重
下列关于单位工程概算的编制方法,说法错误的是()。A.当初步设计达到一定
最新回复
(
0
)