首页
登录
职称英语
For the longest time, I couldn’t get worked up about privacy: my right to it
For the longest time, I couldn’t get worked up about privacy: my right to it
游客
2025-05-07
34
管理
问题
For the longest time, I couldn’t get worked up about privacy: my right to it; how it’s dying; how we’re headed for an even more wired, underregulated, overintrusive, privacy-deprived planet.
I should also point out that as news director for Pathfinder, Time Inc.’s mega info mall,and a guy who makes his living on the Web, I know better than most people that we’re hurtling toward an even more intrusive world. We’re all being watched by computers whenever we visit Websites; by the mere act of "browsing" (it sounds so passive!) we’re going public in a way that was unimaginable a decade ago. I know this because I’m a watcher too. When people come to my Website, without ever knowing their names, I can peer over their shoulders, recording what they look at, timing how long they stay on a particular page, following them around Pathfinder’s sprawling offerings.
None of this would bother me in the least, I suspect, if a few years ago, my phone, like Marley’s ghost, hadn’t given me a glimpse of the nightmares to come. On Thanksgiving weekend in 1995, someone (presumably a critic of a book my wife and I had just written about computer hackers) forwarded my home telephone number to an out-of-state answering machine, where unsuspecting callers trying to reach me heard a male voice identify himself as me and say some extremely rude things. Then, with typical hacker aplomb, the prankster asked people to leave their messages (which to my surprise many callers, including my mother, did). This went on for several days until my wife and I figured out that something was wrong ("Hey...why hasn’t the phone rung since Wednesday?") and got our phone service restored.
It seemed funny at first, and it gave us a swell story to tell on our book tour. But the interloper who seized our telephone line continued to hit us even after the tour ended. And hit us again and again for the next six months. The phone company seemed powerless. Its security folks moved us to one unlisted number after another, half a dozen times. They put special pin codes in place. They put traces on the line. But the troublemaker kept breaking through.
If our hacker had been truly evil and omnipotent as only fictional movie hackers are, there would probably have been even worse ways he could have threatened my privacy. He could have sabotaged my credit rating. He could have eavesdropped on my telephone conversations or siphoned off my e-mail. He could have called in my mortgage, discontinued my health insurance or obliterated my Social Security number. Like Sandra Bullock in the Net, I could have been a digital untouchable, wandering the planet without a connection to the rest of humanity. (Although if I didn’t have to pay back school loans, it might be worth it. Just a thought. )
Still, I remember feeling violated at the time and as powerless as a minnow in a flash flood. Someone was invading my private space—my family’s private space—and there was nothing I or the authorities could do. It was as close to a technological epiphany as I have ever been. And as I watched my personal digital hell unfold, it struck me that our privacy—mine and yours—has already disappeared, not in one Big Brotherly blitzkrieg but in Little Brotherly moments, bit by bit.
Losing control of your telephone, of course, is the least of it. After all, most of us voluntarily give out our phone number and address when we allow ourselves to be listed in the White Pages. Most of us go a lot further than that. We register our whereabouts whenever we put a bank card in an ATM machine or drive through an E-Z Pass lane on the highway. We submit to being photographed every day—20 times a day on average if you live or work in New York City—by surveillance cameras. We make public our interests and our purchasing habits every time we shop by mail order or visit a commercial Website. [br] What information do you learn about the author that establishes him as an authority on this topic?
选项
A、He has suffered a lot in losing his privacy.
B、He makes his living off of the Web.
C、He knows how to monitor his account.
D、He and his wife published a book concerning computer hackers.
答案
B
解析
细节题。根据文中的“I should also point out that…and a guy who makes his living on the Web, I know better than most people that we’re hurtling toward an even more intrusive world.”可知,作者作为时代公司的超级信息刊物《开创者》的新闻主管和一个在网上谋生的人,他比大多数人都更了解人们正急速奔向一个更加具有侵入性的世界。因此B项是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/4065248.html
相关试题推荐
Forthelongesttime,Icouldn’tgetworkedupaboutprivacy:myrighttoit
Heworked______athistaskforweeksbeforehefeltsatisfiedthattheresults
Atlastthegirlcouldn’tbeartheself-reproach,soshedecidedto______thef
Sheworkedhardathertaskbeforeshefeltsurethattheresultswould______h
Wecouldn’treallyaffordtobuyahousesowegotitonmartgagepurchaseandp
Tobe______Icouldn’tunderstandwhathewasgettingat.Ifyouwantedtoknow
Ifyoucouldn’tattendeitheroftheconcertsandare______gnashingyourteeth
Thisisthe(longest)flightI(haveevertaken).BythetimewegettoLosAnge
ThisisthelongestflightIhaveevertaken.BythetimewegettoLosAngeles,
Muchas______,Icouldn’tlendhimthemoneybecauseIsimplydidn’thavethatm
随机试题
Whereisthewoman?[br][originaltext]W:Goodmorning.WhatcanIdoforyou?
Tomanyweb-buildingspiders,mostof【C1】______arenearlyblind,theweb
轴向受拉压杆横截面积为A,受荷载如图所示,则m-m截面上的正应力为:
预计某公司今年末每股收益为2元,每股股息支付率为90%,并且该公司以后每年每股股
简述现代企业人力资源管理各个历史发展阶段的特点。
根据我国《宪法》和有关法律的规定,下列选项中有关法规“批准”生效的情形表述错误的
符合中心性发绀特点的是A.经按摩局部后发绀消失 B.以唇部发绀常见 C.全身
下列选项中,不属于沥青混凝土路面产生横向接缝病害的原因是( )。A.横向接缝施工
患儿男,12岁,来自农村,因发热、全身酸痛、乏力5天于9月入院。查:T39.5℃
在建设工程项目中,施工方进度控制任务的依据是()。A.监理规划 B.施工任务
最新回复
(
0
)