首页
登录
职称英语
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
游客
2025-04-25
18
管理
问题
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has violated the ethical standards of the research community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable obligation to act. At the most immediate level, misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one’s own research or the research of colleagues. 1)
More broadly, even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists and their institutions, which in turn can result in the imposition of counterproductive regulations, and shake public confidence in the integrity of science.
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is possible—but not always. Reprisals by the accused person and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past and have had serious consequences. 2)
Any allegation of misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the charge, the institutions involved, and science in general.
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research ethics usually has more options than are immediately apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. 3)
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, and other senior faculty call be invaluable sources of advice in deciding whether to go forward with a complaint.
An important consideration is deciding when to put a complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal manner than if it is made verbally. 4)
Putting a complaint in writing can have serious consequences for the career of a scientist and should be undertaken only after thorough consideration.
The National Science Foundation and Public Health Service require all research institutions that receive public funds to have procedures in place to deal with allegations of unethical practice. 5)
These procedures take into account fairness for the accused, protection for the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and requirements for confidentiality and disclosure.
In addition, many universities and other research institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics officer, or other official who is available to discuss situations involving research ethics. Such discussions are carried out in the strictest confidence whenever possible. Some institutions provide multiple entry points, so that complainants can go to a person with whom they feel comfortable. [br]
选项
答案
任何对失德行为的指控都非常重要,需要认真对待。如果处理不好,这一指控会使被指控人、指控人、相关机构及科学本身受到严重的伤害。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/4052866.html
相关试题推荐
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
随机试题
Whathappensduringthenaturalgrowthofatreeeachyear?[br][originaltext]
香附的原植物属于A.萝摩科 B.葫芦科 C.天南星科 D.莎草科 E.桔
共用题干WorldHeartDay SundaywasWorld
处方审核的内容不包括A:规定必须做皮试的药物,处方医师是否注明过敏试验及结果的判
A.崩解剂 B.填充剂 C.润湿剂 D.润滑剂 E.黏合剂蒸馏水可作为
男性,46岁,某公司职员,来院要求行常规体检。针对原发性肝癌的筛查方法应选择A.
阅读下面的文章,按要求回答问题。 野艾 多风而温馨的春天一过,陕北高
企业计提的分期付息到期还本的长期借款利息,应通过“应付利息”科目核算。( )
(2014年真题)某机电工程公司通过投标总承包了一工业工程,主要内容包括:施工基
男,19岁。寒战,发热,咳脓痰3天。体温40℃,X线胸片示右肺下叶大片致密影,右
最新回复
(
0
)