首页
登录
职称英语
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to s
游客
2025-04-25
51
管理
问题
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has violated the ethical standards of the research community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable obligation to act. At the most immediate level, misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one’s own research or the research of colleagues. 1)
More broadly, even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists and their institutions, which in turn can result in the imposition of counterproductive regulations, and shake public confidence in the integrity of science.
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is possible—but not always. Reprisals by the accused person and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past and have had serious consequences. 2)
Any allegation of misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the charge, the institutions involved, and science in general.
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research ethics usually has more options than are immediately apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. 3)
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, and other senior faculty call be invaluable sources of advice in deciding whether to go forward with a complaint.
An important consideration is deciding when to put a complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal manner than if it is made verbally. 4)
Putting a complaint in writing can have serious consequences for the career of a scientist and should be undertaken only after thorough consideration.
The National Science Foundation and Public Health Service require all research institutions that receive public funds to have procedures in place to deal with allegations of unethical practice. 5)
These procedures take into account fairness for the accused, protection for the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and requirements for confidentiality and disclosure.
In addition, many universities and other research institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics officer, or other official who is available to discuss situations involving research ethics. Such discussions are carried out in the strictest confidence whenever possible. Some institutions provide multiple entry points, so that complainants can go to a person with whom they feel comfortable. [br]
选项
答案
任何对失德行为的指控都非常重要,需要认真对待。如果处理不好,这一指控会使被指控人、指控人、相关机构及科学本身受到严重的伤害。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/4052866.html
相关试题推荐
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Whatarethechancesthatwewillencountersomealienformoflife,asweex
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Itusedtobesostraightforward.Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherin
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapa
随机试题
[originaltext]W:IthinkI’lltakemymothertothatFrenchrestaurantonMain
根据《电梯工程施工质量验收规范》GB50310-2002,电梯的电气设备接地支线
德国安全咨询公司除了承担对建筑工地小型施工工具的检测检验外,还要向企业提供安全技
继发性肺结核主要发生于A.新生儿 B.婴儿 C.幼儿 D.12岁以下儿童
关于大比例尺地形图数字产品的质量特性构成内容的说法,正确的是( )A.数学精度
不属于城市供热工程城市分区规划中的主要内容的是()。A.估算城市分区的热负荷
工会是职工( )结合的群众组织。A.自愿 B.心愿 C.意愿 D.申请
小便点滴而下,小腹胀满疼痛,舌质紫暗,脉涩。治疗宜用( )。A.春泽汤 B.
人事部门的主管认为,两位财务管理人员的加薪要求与公司现行的薪资制度不符合,拒绝加
中度贫血的评价指标是血红蛋白(Hb)含量为(g/L)A.<30 B.30~60
最新回复
(
0
)