首页
登录
职称英语
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to
游客
2025-04-19
12
管理
问题
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings? Might that not be disastrous?
What about cloning, for instance?
Cloning is a term originally used in connection with nonsexual reproduction of plants and very simple animals. Now it is coming into use in connection with higher animals, since biologists are finding ways of starting with an individual cell of a grown animal and inducing it to multiply in the same way in the future.
But is cloning a safe thing to unleash on society? Might it not be used for destructive purposes? For instance, might not some ruling group decide to clone their submissive, downtrodden peasantry, and thus produce endless hordes of semi-robots who will slave to keep a few in luxury and who may even serve as endless ranks of soldiers designed to conquer the rest of the world?
A dreadful thought, but an unnecessary fear. For one thing, there is no need to clone for the purpose. The ordinary method of reproduction produces all the human beings that are needed and as rapidly as is needed. Right now, the ordinary method is producing so many people as to put civilization in danger of imminent destruction. What more can cloning do?
Secondly, unskilled semi-robots cannot be successfully pitted against the skilled users of machine, either on farms, in factories or in armies. Any nation depending on downtrodden masses will find itself an easy mark for exploitation by a less populous but more skilled and versatile society. This has happened in the past often enough.
But even if we forget about self-hordes, what about the cloning of a relatively few individuals? There are rich people who could afford the expense, or politicians who could have the influence for it, or the gifted who could undergo it by popular demand. There can be two of a particular banker or governor or scientist—or three—or a thousand. Might this not create a kind of privileged caste, who would reproduce themselves in greater and greater numbers, and who would gradually take over the world?
Before we grow concerned about this, we must ask whether there will really be any great demand for cloning. Would you want to be cloned? The new individual that is formed by your cell will have your genes and therefore your appearance and, possibly, talents, but he will not be you. The clone will be, at best, merely your identical twin. Identical twins share the same genetic pattern, but they each have their own individuality and are separate persons.
Cloning is not a pathway to immortality, then, because your consciousness does not survive in your clone, any more than it would in your identical twin if you had one.
In fact, your clone would be far less than your identical twin. What shapes and forms a personality is not genes alone, but all the environment to which it is exposed. Identical twins grow up in identical surroundings, in the same family, and under each other’s influence. A clone of yourself, perhaps thirty or forty years younger would grow up in a different world altogether and would be shaped by influences that would be sure to make him less and less like you as he grows older.
He may even earn your jealousy. After all, you are old and he is young. You may once have been poor and struggled to become well-to-do, but he will be well-to-do from the start. The mere fact that you won’t be able to view him as a child, but as another competing and better-advantaged you, may accentuate the jealousy.
No! Imagine that, after some initial experiments, the demand for cloning will be virtually nonexistent. [br] The word "hordes" used in the passage means______.
选项
A、swarms of fish
B、large groups of people
C、mountain ranges
D、large fields of grain
答案
B
解析
从文中第七段第一句“But even if we forget about self-hordes,what aboutthe cloning of a relatively few individuals?”可知,即使我们忘记大量克隆,克隆一小部分人又能怎样呢?由此推断,hordes和a relatively few individuals是相对的意思。因此B项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/4043901.html
相关试题推荐
Inoursocietytherazorofnecessitycutsclose.Youmustmakeabucktos
Inoursocietytherazorofnecessitycutsclose.Youmustmakeabucktos
Inoursocietytherazorofnecessitycutsclose.Youmustmakeabucktos
Inoursocietytherazorofnecessitycutsclose.Youmustmakeabucktos
Itisnaivetoexpect(hatanysocietycanresolveallthesocialproblemsitis
Inspiteof"endlesstalkofdifference",Americansocietyisanamazingmach
Inoursocietytherazorofnecessitycutsclose.Youmustmakeabucktosur
Inoursocietytherazorofnecessitycutsclose.Youmustmakeabucktosur
Whatoursocietysuffersfrommosttodayistheabsenceofconsensusaboutw
Whatoursocietysuffersfrommosttodayistheabsenceofconsensusaboutw
随机试题
[originaltext]PoliceinMacedoniahavearrestedajournalistonsuspiciontha
【S1】[br]【S9】unprotect→unprotected此处应为house的定语,而unprotect与其构成被动关系,所以应该用过去分词形式,故
[originaltext]AccordingtoUNAIDS(联合国艾滋病规划署)estimates,therewere38.6mi
Shehasa______attitudetowardthismatter.Thatmeanswecan’tdetermineona
含稀有碱基最多的RNA是()。A.rRNA B.mRNA C.tRNA
正式组织的特点是A.自发形成 B.较强的约束力 C.组织内个人的职位不可以替
1957年10月,()把世界第一颗人造卫星送上太空,标志着航天技术的诞生,揭开
后续培训是自律监管的核心内容之一。()
甲欠乙30万元到期后,乙多次催要未果。甲与丙结婚数日后即办理离婚手续,在《离婚协
某工程双代号时标网络计划如下图所示,则工作B的自由时差和总时差()。 A.分别
最新回复
(
0
)