首页
登录
职称英语
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
游客
2025-04-08
3
管理
问题
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really good science it is impossible to predict. If the things to be found are actually new, they are by definition unknown in advance. You cannot make choices in this matter. You either have science or you don’t, and if you have it you are obliged to accept the surprising and disturbing pieces of information, along with the neat and promptly useful bits.
The only solid piece of scientific truth about which I feel totally confident is that we are profoundly ignorant about nature. Indeed, I regard this as the major discovery of the past hundred years of biology. It is, in its way, an illuminating piece of news. It would have amazed the brightest minds of the 18th century Enlightenment to be told by any of us how little we know and how bewildering seems the way ahead. It is this sudden confrontation with the depth and scope of ignorance that represents the most significant contribution of the 20th century science to the human intellect. In earlier times, we either pretended to understand how things worked or ignored the problem, or simply made up stories to fill the gaps.
Now that we have begun exploring in earnest, we are getting glimpses of how huge the questions are, and how far from being answered. Because of this, we are depressed. It is not so bad being ignorant if you are totally ignorant; the hard thing is knowing in some detail the reality of ignorance, the worst spots and here and there the not-so-bad spots, but no true light at the end of the tunnel nor even any tunnels that can yet be trusted.
But we are making a beginning, and there ought to be some satisfaction. There are probably no questions we can think up that can’t be answered, sooner or later, including even the matter of consciousness. To be sure, there may well be questions we can’t think up, ever and therefore limits to the reach of human intellect, but that is another matter. Within our limits, we should be able to work our way through to all our answers, if we keep at it long enough, and pay attention. [br] Which of the following statements is NOT true of scientists in earlier times?
选项
A、They invented false theories to explain things they didn’t understand.
B、They falsely claimed to know all about nature.
C、They did not believe in results from scientific observation.
D、They paid little attention to the problems they didn’t understand.
答案
C
解析
细节判断题。根据题干关键词scientists in earlier times定位到原文第二段尾句。原句中的eitherpretended to understand how things worked(假装知道事物如何发展),or ignored the problem(忽略这些问题),or simply made up stories to fill the gaps(编造一些故事来进行解释)分别与选项B、D、A的内容对应,只有选项C的内容未提到。故答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/4031748.html
相关试题推荐
Themanagingdirectortookthe______fortheaccident,althoughitwasnotreally
Chemistrydidnotemergeas:scienceuntilafterthescientificrevolutioni
Chemistrydidnotemergeas:scienceuntilafterthescientificrevolutioni
Ifweacceptthatwecannotpreventscienceandtechnologyfromchangingour
Ifweacceptthatwecannotpreventscienceandtechnologyfromchangingour
Ifweacceptthatwecannotpreventscienceandtechnologyfromchangingour
Ifweacceptthatwecannotpreventscienceandtechnologyfromchangingour
Ifweacceptthatwecannotpreventscienceandtechnologyfromchangingour
Ifweacceptthatwecannotpreventscienceandtechnologyfromchangingour
Thepioneersoftheteachingofscienceimaginedthatitsintroductioninto
随机试题
Thefollowingdatasufficiencyproblemsconsistofaquestionandtwostatements
TooverridethePresident’sveto,theUSCongressmusthavea______majority.A、
[originaltext]Now,listentoPartTwooftheinterview.Questions6to10areb
2020年3月2日,习近平总书记在北京考察新冠肺炎防控科研攻关工作时强调指出,要
图示砌体结构属于轴心受拉破坏的是( )。
女性,31岁,GPAL,人工流产3次,月经规律,现继发不孕2年,男方精液检查正常
患者男,39岁。查体见肝颈静脉回流征阳性,该患者首先考虑A.肺气肿 B.右心衰
降低肺心病肺动脉高压的首选是A.吸氧 B.强心剂 C.支气管扩张 D.呼吸
异丙嗪不具备的药理作用是A、镇静作用 B、减少胃酸分泌 C、抗胆碱作用 D
患者男性,30岁,为协助确诊肾小球肾炎,留12小时尿做艾迪计数,留取尿液的正确方
最新回复
(
0
)