首页
登录
职称英语
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of po
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of po
游客
2025-04-08
28
管理
问题
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commercialization of culture, has been cast adrift, without any firm basis for judgments. Publications and institutions to support serious criticism, in this view, either no longer exist or are few in number.
Critics today, it is also claimed, are too cozy behind the ivied walls of academe, content to employ a prose style that is decipherable only to a handful of the cognoscenti. The deadly dive of University critics into the shallow depths of popular culture, moreover, reveals the unwillingness of these critics to uphold standards. Even if the reasons offered are contradictory, these Jeremiahs huddle around their sad conclusion that serious cultural criticism has fallen into a morass of petty bickering and bloated reputations.
Such narratives of declension, a staple of American intellectual life since the time of the Puritans, are misplaced, self-serving, and historically inaccurate, so difficult to prove. Has the level of criticism declined in the last 50 years? Of course the logic of such an opinion depends on the figures that are being contrasted with one another. Any number of cultural critics thriving today could be invoked to demonstrate that cultural criticism is alive and well.
But many new and thriving venues for criticism and debate exist today, and they are not limited solely to the discussion of literary works. Actually, they became so entrusted with their own certitude and political judgments that they became largely irrelevant. Today the complaint is that literary culture lacks civility. We live in an age of commercialism and spectacle. Writers seek the limelight, and one way to bask in it is to publish reviews that scorch the landscape, with Dale Peck as the famous, but not atypical, case in point. Heidi Julavits, in an essay in The Believer, lamented the downfall of serious fiction and reviewing. She surveyed a literary culture that had embraced "snark" , her term for hostile, self-serving reviews.
The snark review, according to Julavits, eschews a serious engagement with literature in favor of a sound-bite approach, an attempt to turn the review into a form of entertainment akin to film reviews or restaurant critiques. A critic found cultural criticism to be in "critical condition." For him, the postmodern turn to theory, in its questioning of objectivity, cut the critical, independent ground out from under reviewers. The rise of chain bookstores and blockbuster best sellers demeaned literary culture, making it prey to the commercial values of the market and entertainment.
The criticism does not seem discontinuous. Nor should we forget that civility rarely reigned in the circles of New York intellectuals. The art critic Clement Greenberg physically pummeled the theater critic Lionel Abel after Abel rejected the view that Jean Wahl, the French philosopher, was anti-Semitic. Though Robert Peck has the reputation of a literary hatchet man, so far as I know his blows thus far have all been confined to the printed page.
Cultural criticism has certainly changed over the years. The old days of the critic who wielded unchallenged authority have happily passed. Ours is a more pluralistic age, one not beholden to a narrow literary culture. The democratization of criticism — as in the Amazon system of readers’ evaluating books — is a messy affair, as democracy must be. But the solution to the problems of criticism in the present is best not discovered in the musty basements of nostalgia and sentiment for the cultural criticism of a half-century gone. Rather the solution is to recognize, as John Dewey did almost a century ago, that the problems of democracy demand more democracy, less nostalgia for a golden age that never was, and a spirit of openness to what is new and invigorating in our culture. [br] In order to find a way out the current dilemma for the cultural criticism, the author suggests that______.
选项
A、we should return to the old days when the critics passed their judgments without challenges
B、pluralism should be held back, reinforcing the unchallenged authority in the literary criticism
C、democratic criticism should not be adopted because it is rather messy as proved in the Amazon system
D、we should encourage more democracy, dismiss nostalgia and cultivate an open attitude
答案
D
解析
细节推理题。根据原文尾段尾句提到对于文学评论的困境的解决方法,也就是选项D所说的内容。故答案为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/4031543.html
相关试题推荐
IamsorryIhavenotimeatpresentto______moredetailorgiveyouanaccount
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Ourpresentgenerationofculturalcritics,arrivingaftertheassaultofpo
Ourpresentgenerationofculturalcritics,arrivingaftertheassaultofpo
Ourpresentgenerationofculturalcritics,arrivingaftertheassaultofpo
Hiswritingdepictsthischangingworldandtheincreasingculturaldiversityof
随机试题
Cultureshockissonamedbecauseoftheeffectithasonpeoplewhentheye
[originaltext]M:I’mlookingforsomesportsshoes.Canyougivemesomeadvice
为了解组织的职业健康安全和环境的管理现状,在贯标培训后应进行的基础工作是()
安全管理策划方案应包括()A.举办场地曾经发生事故的应对方案 B.规模与
26岁,初产妇,妊娠39周,规律宫缩18小时,肛查宫口8cm,先露0,胎膜未破,
男,63岁。不慎滑倒后感觉右髋部疼痛,不能站立及行走。体检发现右髋部肿胀,皮下淤
运维班每天应检查当日全部已执行的工作票。()汇总分析工作票的执行情况,做好统
施工总进度计划是施工组织总设计的主要组成部分,编制施工总进度计划的主要工作有(
矽肺病的预防措施是“风、水、密、净和护”五个方面,其中“护”是指()。A.采取个
重症肌无力病人应选用A.毛果芸香碱 B.碘解磷定 C.氯磷定 D.新斯的明
最新回复
(
0
)