2. 职称英语
  3. When we worry about who might be spying on our private lives, we usually thi

When we worry about who might be spying on our private lives, we usually thi

游客2025-04-07  4
问题     When we worry about who might be spying on our private lives, we usually think about the Federal agents. But the private sector outdoes the government every time. It’s Linda Tripp, not the FBI, who is facing charges under Maryland’s laws against secret telephone taping. It’s our banks, not the Internal Revenue Service(IRS), that pass our private financial data to telemarketing firms.
    Consumer activists are pressing Congress for better privacy laws without much result so far. The legislators lean toward letting business people track our financial habits virtually at will.
    As an example of what’s going on, consider U. S. Bancorp, which was recently sued for deceptive practices by the state of Minnesota. According to the lawsuit, the bank supplied a telemarketer called MemberWorks with sensitive customer data such as names, phone numbers, bank-account and credit-card numbers, Social Security numbers, account balances and credit limits.
    With these customer lists in hand, MemberWorks started dialing for dollars-selling dental plans, videogames, computer software and other products and services. Customers who accepted a " free trial offer" had 30 days to cancel. If the deadline passed, they were charged automatically through their bank or credit-card accounts. U. S. Bancorp collected a share of the revenues.
    Customers were doubly deceived, the lawsuit claims. They, didn’t know that the bank was giving account numbers to MemberWorks. And if customers asked, they were led to think the answer was no.
    The state sued MemberWorks separately for deceptive selling. The company denies that it did anything wrong. For its part, U. S. Bancorp settled without admitting any mistakes. But it agreed to stop exposing its customers to nonfinancial products sold by outside firms. A few top banks decided to do the same. Many other banks will still do business with MemberWorks and similar firms.
    And banks will still be mining data from your account in order to sell you financial products, including things of little value, such as credit insurance and credit-card protection plans.
    You have almost no protection from businesses that use your personal accounts for profit. For example, no federal law shields "transaction and experience" information—mainly the details of your bank and credit-card accounts. Social Security numbers are for sale by private firms. They’ve generally agreed not to sell to the public. But to businesses, the numbers are an open book. Self-regulation doesn’t work. A firm might publish a privacy-protection policy, but who enforces it?
    Take U. S. Bancorp again. Customers were told, in writing, that " all personal information you supply to us will be considered confidential". Then it sold your data to MemberWorks. The bank even claims that it doesn’t "sell" your data at all. It merely "shares" it and reaps a profit. Now you know. [br] Businesses do not regard information concerning personal bank accounts as private because ______.
选项 A、it is considered "transaction and experience" information unprotected by law
B、it has always been considered an open secret by the general public
C、its sale can be brought under control through self-regulation
D、its revelation will do no harm to consumers under the current protection policy
答案 B
解析 细节事实题。根据关键词businesses，personal bank accounts定位到文章第八段。首句提到企业利用你的个人账户获利，而你却几乎无法得到保护；再根据第八段第二、三句。综合判断，选项B(这些信息被(企业)认为是不被法律保护的“交易往来”信息)正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/4030760.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)