首页
登录
职称英语
Gregory Currie, a professor of philosophy eat the University of Nottingham,
Gregory Currie, a professor of philosophy eat the University of Nottingham,
游客
2025-03-29
2
管理
问题
Gregory Currie, a professor of philosophy eat the University of Nottingham, recently argued in The New York Times that we ought not to claim that literature improves us as people, because there is no “compelling evidence that suggests that people are morally or socially better for reading Tolstoy” or other great books.
Actually, there is such evidence. Raymond Mar, a psychologist at York University in Canada, and Keith Oatley, a professor of cognitive psychology at the University of Toronto, reported in studies published in 2006 and 2009 that individuals who often read fiction appear to be better able to understand other people, empathize (起共鸣)with them and view the world from their perspective. This link persisted even after the researchers factored in the possibility that more empathetic individuals might choose to read more novels.
Recent research in cognitive science, psychology and neuroscience has demonstrated that deep reading of books is a distinctive experience, very different from the information-driven reading we do on the Web. Although deep reading does not, strictly speaking, require a conventional book, the built-in limits of the printed page are uniquely conducive to the deep reading experience. A book’s lack of hyperlinks allows the reader to remain fully immersed in the narrative, without having to make such decisions as whether to click on a link or not.
That immersion is supported by the way the brain handles language rich in sensory detail and emotional and moral complexity, by creating a mental representation that draws on the same brain regions that would be active if the scene were unfolding in real life. The emotional situations and moral dilemmas that are the stuff of literature are also vigorous exercise for the brain, propelling us inside the heads of fictional characters and even increasing our real-life capacity for empathy. This is not reading as many young people are coming to know it. Their reading, mostly done onscreen, is pragmatic and instrumental. If we allow our children to believe reading onscreen is all there is, we will have deprived them of an enjoyable and enlightening experience that will enlarge them as people. Instead molding our education around young people’s attachment to digital devices and onscreen habits, we need to show them some place they’ve never been to, a place only deep reading can take them to. [br] The studies of Raymond Mar and Keith Oatley show that________.
选项
A、empathetic people are more likely to read novels often
B、empathetic people have a better perspective on the world
C、reading fiction encourages people to be more persistent
D、reading fiction helps people understand others better
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/4017520.html
相关试题推荐
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunityt
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunityt
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunityt
TheProfessorsprangtohisfeet,______ahandtohisrosy,baldhead.A、covered
TestsconductedattheUniversityofPennsylvania’sPsychologicalLaboratory
TestsconductedattheUniversityofPennsylvania’sPsychologicalLaboratory
TestsconductedattheUniversityofPennsylvania’sPsychologicalLaboratory
Don’tcallhimjustacollegeprofessor.Internetentrepreneur,TVpersonali
Don’tcallhimjustacollegeprofessor.Internetentrepreneur,TVpersonali
Don’tcallhimjustacollegeprofessor.Internetentrepreneur,TVpersonali
随机试题
Therearealtogether______nationswithintheBritishCommonwealthnowadays.A、4
男性,28岁,体检发现心脏杂音来诊,怀疑风湿性心脏病。下列检查哪项有确诊意义(
堤防工程级别根据堤防工程的防洪标准确定,当堤防的防洪标准大于等于20年又小30年
关于臀位的发生与并发症,正确的是A.单臀位发生率最低 B.早产发生率低于足月产
下列选项中,不属于回购退出的是()。A.另一股权投资基金购买股权投资基金
脊柱出现颈椎前凸的时间是A.6个月 B.12个月 C.3个月 D.9个月
下列哪项内容不属于护理学的实践范畴A.临床护理 B.社区护理 C.护理管理
左图为给定的立体图,从任意角度剖开,右边哪一项不可能是它的截面图? A.如上图
胃的壁细胞分泌A.胃泌素 B.胆囊收缩素 C.内因子 D.促胰液素
汽车以每小时54千米的速度笔直地开向峭壁,驾驶员按一声喇叭,6秒后听到回声,已知
最新回复
(
0
)