2. 职称英语
  3. In 1971 researchers hoping to predict earthquakes in the short term by identifyi

In 1971 researchers hoping to predict earthquakes in the short term by identifyi

游客2025-02-25  44
问题 In 1971 researchers hoping to predict earthquakes in the short term by identifying precursory phenomena (those that occur a few days before large quakes but not otherwise) turned their attention to changes in seismic waves that had been detected prior to earthquakes. An explanation for such changes was offered by "dilatancy theory," based on a well-known phenomenon observed in rocks in the laboratory: as stress builds, microfractures in rock close, decreasing the rock’s volume. But as stress continues to increase, the rock begins to crack and expand in volume, allowing groundwater to seep in, weakening the rock. According to this theory, such effects could lead to several precursory phenomena in the field, including a change in the velocity of seismic waves, and an increase in small, nearby tremors.
Researchers initially reported success in identifying these possible precursors, but subsequent analyses of their data proved disheartening. Seismic waves with unusual velocities were recorded before some earthquakes, but while the historical record confirms that most large earthquakes are preceded by minor tremors, these foreshocks indicate nothing about the magnitude of an impending quake and are indistinguishable from other minor tremors that occur without large earthquakes.
In the 1980s, some researchers turned their efforts from short-term to long-term prediction. Noting that earthquakes tend to occur repeatedly in certain regions, Lindh and Baker attempted to identify patterns of recurrence, or earthquake cycles, on which to base predictions. In a study of earthquake-prone sites along the San Andreas Fault, they determined that quakes occurred at intervals of approximately 22 years near one site and concluded that there was a 95 percent probability of an earthquake in that area by 1992. The earthquake did not occur within the time frame predicted, however.
Evidence against the kind of regular earthquake cycles that Lindh and Baker tried to establish has come from a relatively new field, paleoseismology. Paleoseismologists have unearthed and dated geological features such as fault scarps that were caused by earthquakes thousands of years ago. They have determined that the average interval between ten earthquakes that took place at one site along the San Andreas Fault in the past two millennia was 132 years, but individual intervals ranged greatly, from 44 to 332 years. [br] The author implies which of the following about the ability of the researchers mentioned in line 18 to predict earthquakes?
选项 A、They can identify when an earthquake is likely to occur but not how large it will be.
B、They can identify the regions where earthquakes are likely to occur but not when they will occur.
C、They are unable to determine either the time or the place that earthquakes are likely to occur.
D、They are likely to be more accurate at short-term earthquake prediction than at long-term earthquake prediction.
E、They can determine the regions where earthquakes have occurred in the past but not the regions where they are likely to occur in the future.
答案 C
解析 Supporting idea
The question asks for information explicitly provided in the passage. The second paragraph indicates that researchers at first reported success in identifying earthquake precursors, but further analysis of the data undermined their theory. The passage then explains that atypical seismic waves were recorded before some earthquakes; this evidence at first seemed to support the researchers’ theory, before further analysis proved the evidence inadequate.
A Although earthquakes are caused by stress on rock, the passage does not indicate that this fact encouraged researchers to believe that precursors could be used to predict earthquakes.
B This fact would undermine the theory that changes in seismic waves are precursory phenomena that can be used to predict earthquakes.
C Correct. Seismic waves with unusual velocities occurring before earthquakes at first seemed to provide support for researchers’ theory that earthquakes could be predicted by precursory phenomena.
D Though earthquakes’ recurrence in certain regions is mentioned as being important to researchers seeking to make long-term earthquake predictions, it is not mentioned as being relevant to researchers’ theory that earthquakes can be predicted by precursory phenomena.
E This is not mentioned as being relevant to scientists’ belief that earthquakes could be predicted on the basis of precursory phenomena.
The correct answer is C.
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3971823.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)