首页
登录
职称英语
"Weather and Chaotic Systems" Scientists today have a ve
"Weather and Chaotic Systems" Scientists today have a ve
游客
2025-02-08
29
管理
问题
"Weather and Chaotic Systems"
Scientists today have a very good understanding of the physical laws and mathematical equations that govern the behavior and motion of atoms in the air, oceans, and land. Why, then, do we have so much trouble predicting the weather? For a long time, most scientists
assumed
that the difficulty of weather prediction would go away once we had enough weather stations to collect data from around the world and sufficiently powerful computers to deal with all the data. However, we now know that weather is
fundamentally
unpredictable on time scales longer than a few weeks. To understand why, we must look at the nature of scientific prediction.
→ Suppose you want to predict the location of a car on a road 1 minute from now. You need two basic pieces of information: where the car is now, and how fast it is moving. If the car is now passing Smith Road and heading north at 1 mile per minute, it will be 1 mile north of Smith Road in 1 minute.
Now, suppose you want to predict the weather. Again, you need two basic types of information: (1) the current weather and (2) how weather changes from one moment to the next. You could attempt to predict the weather by creating a "model world." For example, you could overlay a globe of the Earth with graph paper and then specify the current temperature, pressure, cloud cover, and wind within each square. These are your starting points, or initial conditions. Next, you could input all the initial conditions into a computer, along with a set of equations (physical laws) that describe the processes that can change weather from one moment to the next.
→ Suppose the initial conditions represent the weather around the Earth at this very moment and you run your computer model to predict the weather for the next month in New York City. The model might tell you that tomorrow will be warm and sunny, with cooling during the next week and a major storm passing through a month from now. Now suppose you run the model again but make one minor change in the initial conditions—say, a small change in the wind speed somewhere over Brazil.A For tomorrow’s weather, this slightly different initial condition will not change the weather prediction for New York City.B But for next month’s weather, the two predictions may not agree at all! C
The disagreement between the two predictions arises because the laws governing weather can cause very tiny changes in initial conditions to be greatly magnified over time.D This extreme sensitivity to initial conditions is sometimes called the butterfly effect: If initial conditions change by as much as the flap of a butterfly’s wings, the resulting prediction may be very different.
→ The butterfly effect is a hallmark of chaotic systems. Simple systems are described by linear equations
in which
, for example, increasing a cause produces a proportional increase in an effect. In contrast, chaotic systems are described by nonlinear equations, which allow for subtler and more intricate interactions. For example, the economy is nonlinear because a rise in interest rates does not automatically produce a corresponding change in consumer spending. Weather is nonlinear because a change in the wind speed in one location does not automatically produce a corresponding change in another location. Many (but not all) nonlinear systems exhibit chaotic behavior.
→ Despite their name, chaotic systems are not completely random. In fact, many chaotic systems have a kind of underlying order that explains the general
features
of their behavior even while details at any particular moment remain unpredictable. In a sense, many chaotic systems are "predictably unpredictable." Our understanding of chaotic systems is increasing at a tremendous rate, but much remains to be learned about them. [br] Why do the predictions disagree for the computer model described in paragraph 4?
选项
A、The conditions at the beginning were very different.
B、The model was not accurately programmed.
C、Computer models cannot predict weather.
D、Over time models are less reliable.
答案
D
解析
"For tomorrow’s weather, this slightly different initial condition will not change the weather prediction... But for next month’s weather, the two predictions may not agree at all!" Choice A is not correct because the change in the initial conditions was minor. Choice B is not correct because it is not mentioned in the passage. Choice C is not correct because computer models are used to deal with all the data for weather prediction on time scales shorter than a few weeks.
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3948184.html
相关试题推荐
"WeatherandChaoticSystems"Scientiststodayhaveave
"WeatherandChaoticSystems"Scientiststodayhaveave
"WeatherandChaoticSystems"Scientiststodayhaveave
"WeatherandChaoticSystems"Scientiststodayhaveave
"WeatherandChaoticSystems"Scientiststodayhaveave
"WeatherandChaoticSystems"Scientiststodayhaveave
POLITICALSYSTEMSOFTHETWENTIETHCENTURY1Monarchyisaformofg
POLITICALSYSTEMSOFTHETWENTIETHCENTURY1Monarchyisaformofg
POLITICALSYSTEMSOFTHETWENTIETHCENTURY1Monarchyisaformofg
POLITICALSYSTEMSOFTHETWENTIETHCENTURY1Monarchyisaformofg
随机试题
Atrendamongmanycollegesanduniversitiesistooffercoursesthataresl
Schoolsthroughouttheworldareexperiencingaperiodofrapidchangeand,
[originaltext]M:WhatarelationshipStevenandhisfatherhave!W:Don’tthey
关于模板拆除的说法,正确的是()。A.底模及其支架拆除应符合设计或规范要求
关于结核分枝杆菌L型,叙述错误的是A.菌体膨大 B.抗酸性减弱或消失 C.致
常见扣件形式有3种,下列关于扣件形式的说法中,错误的是( )。A.扣件按照结构
Ⅰ类反光膜逆反射系数RA值表中每个观测角对应的入射角有()。A.-4°
A.金缕梅科B.橄榄科C.伞形科D.棕榈科E.安息香科血竭来源于()。
美国学者孟禄根据原始社会没有学校、没有教师的史实,断定教育起源于儿童对成人的无意
不思进食,食不知味,神倦多汗,大便溏薄夹不消化食物,面色少华,形体偏瘦,肢倦乏力
最新回复
(
0
)