首页
登录
职称英语
"The Heredity Versus Environment Debate"P1 The past cen
"The Heredity Versus Environment Debate"P1 The past cen
游客
2025-02-05
9
管理
问题
"The Heredity Versus Environment Debate"
P1 The past century has seen heated controversy about whether intelligence, which relates strongly to school achievement, is determined primarily by heredity or by environment. A When
IQ
tests were undergoing rapid development early in the twentieth century, many psychologists believed that intelligence was determined primarily by heredity. B
P2 Environmentalist view. By the middle of the twentieth century, numerous studies had counteracted the hereditarian view, and most social scientists took the position that environment is as important as or even more important than heredity in determining intelligence. C Social scientists who stress the environmentalist view of intelligence generally emphasize the need for continual compensatory programs beginning in infancy. Many also criticize the use of IQ tests on the grounds that these tests are culturally biased. D
P3 James Flynn, who collected similar data on other countries, found that "massive" gains in the IQ scores of the population in fourteen nations have occurred during the twentieth century. These improvements, according to Flynn’s analysis, largely stemmed not from genetic improvement in the population but from environmental changes that ied to gains in the kinds of skills assessed by IQ tests. Torsten Husen and his colleagues also have concluded, after reviewing large amounts of data, that improvements in economic and social conditions, and particularly in the availability of schooling, can produce substantial gains in average IQ from one generation to the next. In general, educators committed to improving the performance of low-achieving students find these studies encouraging.
P4 Hereditarian view. The hereditarian view of intelligence underwent a major revival in the 1970s and 1980s, based particularly on the writings of Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and a group of researchers conducting the Minnesota Study of Twins. Summarizing previous research as well as their own studies, these researchers identified heredity as the major factor in determining intelligence—accounting for up to 80 percent of the variation in IQ scores.
P5 Jensen published a highly controversial study in the Harvard Educational Review in 1969. Pointing out that African-Americans averaged about 15 points below whites on IQ tests, Jensen attributed this gap to a genetic difference between the two races in learning abilities and patterns. Critics countered Jensen’s arguments by contending that a host of environmental factors that affect IQ, including malnutrition and prenatal care are difficult to measure and impossible to separate from hereditary factors. IQ tests are biased, they said, and do not necessarily even measure intelligence. After his 1969 article, Jensen has continued to cite data that he believed link intelligence primarily to heredity. His critics continue to respond with evidence that environmental factors, and schooling in particular, have a major influence on IQ.
P6 Synthesizers’ view. Certain social scientists have taken a middle, or "synthesizing," position in this controversy. The synthesizers’ view of intelligence holds that both heredity and environment contribute to differences in measured intelligence. For example, Christopher Jencks, after reviewing a large amount of data, concluded that heredity is responsible for 45 percent of the IQ variance, environment accounts for 35 percent, and interaction between the two ("interaction" meaning that particular abilities thrive or wither in specific environments) accounts for 20 percent. Robert Nichols reviewed all these and other data and concluded that the true value for heredity may be anywhere between 0.40 and 0.80 but that the exact value has little importance for policy. In general, Nichols and other synthesizers maintain that heredity determines the fixed limits of a range; within those limits, the interaction between environment and heredity yields the individual’s intelligence. In this view, even if interactions between heredity and environment limit our ability to specify exactly how much of a child’s intelligence reflects environmental factors, teachers (and parents) should provide each child with a productive environment in which to realize her or his maximum potential.
Glossary
IQ: intelligence quotient; a numerical value for intelligence [br] Based on the information in paragraph 6, which of the following best explains the term "synthesizing"?
选项
A、A moderate position between the two extremes
B、A position for which the evidence is overwhelming
C、A controversial position that is hotly debated
D、A modern revision of an outdated position
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3944231.html
相关试题推荐
"TheHeredityVersusEnvironmentDebate"P1Thepastcen
"TheHeredityVersusEnvironmentDebate"P1Thepastcen
"TheHeredityVersusEnvironmentDebate"P1Thepastcen
"TheHeredityVersusEnvironmentDebate"P1Thepastcen
"TheHeredityVersusEnvironmentDebate"P1Thepastcen
ReconstructingAncientEnvironmentsP1:Archaeologyisparticularlyimportantfo
ReconstructingAncientEnvironmentsP1:Archaeologyisparticularlyimportantfo
ReconstructingAncientEnvironmentsP1:Archaeologyisparticularlyimportantfo
ReconstructingAncientEnvironmentsP1:Archaeologyisparticularlyimportantfo
ReconstructingAncientEnvironmentsP1:Archaeologyisparticularlyimportantfo
随机试题
Oneoftheworstthingyoucandoasaspeakeristoholdyour【M1】______arm
[originaltext]M:Ifitdoesnotrain,let’sgooutforawalkthisevening.W:
在某种特定文化中长大的人们有着某种共同的价值观和观念。这并不意味着他们都以完全同样的程度共有完金同样的价值观;但它确实意味着他们中的大多数人在大多数时候
【教学过程】 环节一:课堂导入 【视频展示】多媒体播放视频:中国各大港口进出口商品快速增长和华为手机越来越受到国外消费者的欢迎。教师提问:这些商品都有什
美英等国把个人形成的文件都视为私人手稿。()
以擅长烹制山珍海鲜为特色,以佛跳墙、炒西施舌等为名菜的是( )。A.浙菜 B
下列关于份额登记机构职责的表述正确的是()。A.妥善保存登记数据,并将基金份额
2020年我国货物进出口总额321557亿元,对“一带一路”沿线国家进出口总额9
小杜是刚入职的社会工作者,她在为老年人服务时产生了极大的困惑,不知道如何将课堂上
对所发生的每项经济业务事项都要以会计凭证为依据,一方面记入有关总分类账户,另一方
最新回复
(
0
)