2. 职称英语
  3. DOCUMENTING THE INCAS (1) The In

DOCUMENTING THE INCAS (1) The In

游客2025-02-04  9
问题                                             DOCUMENTING THE INCAS
    (1) The Incas ruled a vast empire in western South America when the Spaniards encountered them in the 16th century. [A] Although the Incas had no writing system of their own, historical information about Incas is available to researchers because early Spaniards wrote documents about them. [B] However, there are drawbacks to use the written records. [C] First, the Spanish writers were describing activities and institutions that were very different from their own, but they often described Inca culture in terms of their own society. [D] As an example, consider the list of kings given by the Incas. As presented in the historical chronology, Spanish sources indicate there were 13 kings who ruled sequentially. The names were given to them by Inca informants. However, one school of thought in Inca studies suggests that the names were not actual people, but, rather, titles filled by different individuals. Thus, the number of actual kings may have been fewer, and several titles may have been filled at the same time. The early Spanish writers, being unfamiliar with such a system of titles, simply translated it into something they were familiar with (a succession of kings). Given that the Inca empire expanded only during the time of the last four kings, or as a result of the actions of the individuals in those four positions, this question is not deemed significant for an understanding of the Incas. But the example shows that biases and inaccuracies may have been introduced inadvertently from the very beginning of the written Spanish reports about the Incas. Moreover, early writers often copied information from each other—so misinformation was likely to be passed on and accepted as true by later scholars.
    (2) Second, both Spanish writers and Inca informants sometimes had motives for being deliberately deceitful. For example, in an effort to gain status in the Spaniards’ eyes, Incas might say that they formerly had been more important in the Inca empire than they actually were. Spanish officials as well were occasionally untruthful when it served their purposes. For example, Spaniards might deliberately underreport the productivity of a region under their authority so they could sell the additional products and keep the money, rather than hand it over to the Spanish Crown.
    (3) Third, it should be noted that the Spaniards’ main sources of information were the Incas themselves, often members of the Inca ruling class. Therefore, what was recorded was the Incas’ point of view about their own history and empire. Some modern authorities question whether the history of Incas happened as they said it did. Although some of their history is certainly more myth than truth, many, if not most, scholars agree that the history of the last four Inca kings is probably accurate. The same is true of other things told to the Spanish writers: the more recently an event is said to have occurred, the more likely it is to have actually happened.
    (4) A fourth problem relates to the nature of the Inca conquests of the other peoples in the Americas before the Spanish arrived and how accurate the accounts of those conquests are—whether related by the Spaniards or by the Incas on whom they relied. It was certainly in the Incas’ interest to describe themselves as invincible and just. However, lacking accounts by conquered people about their interactions with the Incas, it is unknown how much of the information of the Inca conquest as related by the ruling class is factual.
    (5) Finally, there is a certain vagueness in the historical records regarding places and names. Many Spanish writers listed places they had visited within the empire, including both provinces and towns. However, other writers traveling along the same routes sometimes recounted different lists of places. In addition, it is difficult to identify the exact locations of towns and other geographic points of reference because of the widespread movements of people over the past five centuries.
    (6) For all these reasons, the historical records must be carefully evaluated to determine whether they are accurate and to verify the locations of past events. One approach is to cross-check information from a number of authors. Another approach is to conduct archeological research. Regardless of the problems, historical documents review some important information about the Incas. [br] Why does the author indicate that the Spaniards’ main sources of information were the Incas themselves?
选项 A、To argue that the Spaniards made great efforts to obtain the most information
B、To explain why some scholars think that the documentary history of the Inca empire may not be correct
C、To question the idea that more recent events in the Inca empire are more likely to be accurate than are more ancient ones
D、To explain how scholars are able to determine that the history of the last four Inca kings is probably correct
答案 B
解析 本题为修辞目的题，题干问为什么作者表明西班牙人记录信息的主要来源是印加人自己。根据题干信息可定位到原文第3段第1、2句，而B项“为了解释为什么一些学者认为印加帝国历史的记录可能不符合事实”来源于原文第3段第3句。第3段前3句的逻辑是，作者先说历史记录大部分是印加人自己提供的信息(第1、2句)，再说学者由此对记录产生怀疑(第3句)。因此，第3句的内容便是作者阐释前两句的目的，故B项符合题意。A项“为了论证西班牙人在获取大多数信息时付出了很多努力”无原文依据。C项意为“为了质疑‘越是新近在印加帝国发生的事越有可能比那些古代的事更加符合事实’这个观点”，首先，对该观点的质疑与印加人自己提供信息不构成因果关系，逻辑上不通顺；其次，文中该选项Ⅲ现的第3段第4、5句所论述的都是在支撑这个观点，而不是为了质疑，故排除此项，D项“为了解释学者们如何断定最后四位国王在位时期的历史可能是符合史实的”，文中没有说明学者们是如何断定的，故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3942015.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)