首页
登录
职称英语
Demonstrators rally at Los Angeles City Hall during the first Women’s March,
Demonstrators rally at Los Angeles City Hall during the first Women’s March,
游客
2025-01-18
71
管理
问题
Demonstrators rally at Los Angeles City Hall during the first Women’s March, held on Jan. 21, 2017, one day after President Trump’s inauguration. The march drew hundreds of thousands of participants in L. A. An event organized to bring women together is proving to be
much more divisive than intended
. The annual women’s march in Eureka has been canceled after organizers decided the planning committee was too white. The move has prompted newfound criticism of the global gatherings that were launched two years ago in protest of the inauguration of President Trump. Many have said the marches are not diverse enough and have accused the organization of being anti-Semitic and homophobic.
The Eureka group, which is not an official Women’s March chapter, said that instead of the planned Jan. 19 march, it will focus on organizing an event for March 9, in conjunction with International Women’s Day. The move will allow more time to reach out to women of color and those who identify as
gender nonconforming
, organizers said in a Facebook post last week. "The local organizers are continuing to meet and discuss how to broaden representation in the organizing committee to create an event that represents and supports peoples who live here" in Humboldt County, an organizer said in the post. "Up to this point, the participants have been overwhelmingly white, lacking representation from several perspectives in our community."
The decision made by a handful of women in the small town of Eureka—which Census data show is 71% non-Hispanic white—drew mixed reactions, both locally and across the country. Supporters were thrilled the group was taking steps toward increasing its diversity and inclusion. Others, however, said the move was a criticism of people of color for not joining in and that by postponing the march, organizers were placing the burden on participants to make the local women’s march appear less white. "I have deep concerns that people of color are being used as a
crutch
for the organizing committee failing to do the work it takes to encourage diversity," Caterina Kein wrote on Facebook. "Please do not blame ’us’ for your failures."
The backlash prompted Women’s March Eureka to release a second statement on Monday noting the decision to cancel the event was based on the lack of diversity among the group’s leadership, not among the march’s attendees. In an interview with KHSU-FM radio, organizer Kelsey Reedy said the original organizers were all white women and that only two recent additions have increased the diversity of the small group. "It wasn’t just we felt there wasn’t enough representation. There literally was no representation," she said.
The organizers acknowledged that past attempts at being inclusive have been shallow. "We could have done a lot more," Reedy said. "We did not push ourselves to really create a space that was welcoming for everyone to be involved. We did reach out to several groups led by people of color, but only having a few people in the group that even had those connections means it was pretty limited."
The larger Women’s March organization has faced other problems, including accusations of being anti-Semitic. Leaders of the national group came under fire last year after co-chair Tamika Mallory attended a February event with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, in which he said, "The powerful Jews are my enemy." Between March and November, the larger group issued three statements in response to criticism that Women’s March leaders are anti-Semitic and homophobic, but it has repeatedly expressed support for its leaders, including Mallory. "It’s become clear, amidst this media storm, that our values and our message have—too often—been lost," the national group said. "That loss caused a lot of harm, and a lot of pain. We should have been faster and clearer in helping people understand our values and our commitment to fighting anti-Semitism. We regret that."
(选自《洛杉矶时报》2019年1月3日) [br] Which of the following statements is NOT true?
选项
A、This year’s women’s march was postponed.
B、The local organizers wanted to contact some lesbians.
C、The topic of how to create a representative event is being discussed.
D、The representatives are from several perspectives of the community.
答案
D
解析
推断题。第2段最后一句lacking representation是说参与者大多是白人,缺乏来自社会多方面的代表。D选项的表述与此不合,故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3918204.html
相关试题推荐
Duringthatyear,Ioftenponderedwhatitwouldbeliketoloveadeafandblin
Thingswentwellforherduringherearlylifebutinhermiddleageher________
Duringthe________oftherain,shereturnedhomeimmediately.A、spinB、flickC、lu
Duringthe________oftherain,shereturnedhomeimmediately.A、spinB、flickC、lu
TheU-boatblockade________England’sfoodshortageduringWorldWarII.A、aggrega
Everydepartmenthashadtheirbudget________duringthefinancialcrisis.A、incre
DuringJapan’srevolutioninthe19thcentury,theJapanesedenouncedtheirown
DemonstratorsrallyatLosAngelesCityHallduringthefirstWomen’sMarch,
DemonstratorsrallyatLosAngelesCityHallduringthefirstWomen’sMarch,
DemonstratorsrallyatLosAngelesCityHallduringthefirstWomen’sMarch,
随机试题
[originaltext]About500,000studentstooktheSATcollege-admissionstestl
"TheHydrologicCycle"→Thehydrologiccycleisthetransf
关于工作样本测试说法不正确的是()。A.工作样本测试不属于评价中心技术 B
空调水系统过滤器的说法中,正确的是()。A.空气源热泵式空调冷水机组的定压管
在项目的经济评价中,哪些项目必须进行国民经济评价?()A.对国民经济有较大影
根据《营业性演出管理条例》规定文艺表演团体变更以下哪些内容,应当向原发证机关申请
尿胆原测定的最适宜标本为A.3h尿B.随机尿C.餐后尿D.首次晨尿E.12h尿
编制大中型建设工程项目施工成本支出计划时,既要在项目总的方面考虑总的预备费,也要
法律规定应当采用书面形式的合同,当事人未采用书面形式,但一方已履行了全部义务,对
在记录工作底稿时,应记录识别特征。下列说法中正确的是( )。A.对被审计单位生
最新回复
(
0
)