首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext] This past September, Apple released new iPhone models without
[originaltext] This past September, Apple released new iPhone models without
游客
2025-01-17
36
管理
问题
This past September, Apple released new iPhone models without headphone jacks. The people were not pleased. "It’s eliminating a connector and adding inconvenience in the name of profit," one commenter wrote. "Apple wants to see just how stupid the public really is," said another. " There is absolutely no reason to get rid of a perfectly working universal headphone jack," added a third.
As it turns out, there is a reason. The plug itself is small. But the corresponding receptacle on the inside of the phone is relatively enormous. By removing it, Apple says, it was able to fit in a bigger battery, giving the iPhone 7 two more hours of life per charge, a stabilized camera for fewer blurry photographs and stereo speakers.
Apple includes, in the box, both a new pair of earbuds and a two-inch adapter for existing headphones. But those wired approaches are meant to be stopgap measures until we all buy wireless headphones, which now cost as little as $ 17.
Apple’s inclination to kill of "standard" components in the name of progress is no surprise. This, after all, was the company that famously eliminated floppy drives, CD-ROM drives and dial-up modems. And it got rid of physical keyboards on smartphones. It has discontinued a series of its own connectors, such as ADB, SCSI, Fire Wire and the original iPhone charging jack. And every single time, the public is outraged.
So the pattern is now clear: The tech companies change some way of doing something. The public screams bloody murder. But a couple of years later we’ve all adopted the new technology and forgotten the old one. It’s probably been years since you pined for the blistering speed of a dial-up modem and a decade since you wished you had a floppy drive. Does that mean we’re stupid and nearsighted? Not exactly. In the case of tech, there’s a cost to each of these changes. There’s a monetary cost, of course. By the time the industry abandoned the floppy-disk and CD-ROM standards, our collections of those disks were rendered worthless. And in the case of the disappearing headphone jack, there will be the cost of new wireless earbuds. There’s also a learning cost. Every time someone takes away a skill we’ve mastered and introduces one we haven’t, that’s a time-consuming challenge. There’s even a convenience cost.
During the transitional period to the new standard, we often have to buy and carry some bridge technology, such as external DVD drives, USB modems — or headphone-jack adapters. Above all, though, there’s a psychological cost to change, a helpless, primitive "Who moved my cheese?" reaction. As a species, we don’t like lifestyle changes even if logic tells us that we should make them. (See also: climate change, diet, smoking.)
That’s because, at its heart, change means leaping into the unknown. And the unknown — as our Neandertal ancestors approaching a dark cave could have told you — is frightening. The big tech companies will always want to swat their public along into the future. In the end, resistance is futile — but it’s also entirely understandable.
选项
答案
This past September, Apple released new iPhone models without headphone jacks. The people were not pleased.
"It’s eliminating a connector and adding inconvenience in the name of profit," one commenter wrote. " Apple wants to see just how stupid the public really is," said another. " There is absolutely no reason to get rid of a perfectly working universal headphone jack," added a third.
As it turns out, there is a reason.
The plug itself is small. But the corresponding receptacle on the inside of the phone is relatively enormous.
By removing it, Apple says, it was able to fit in a bigger battery, giving the iPhone 7 two more hours of life per charge,
a stabilized camera for fewer blurry photographs and stereo speakers.
Apple includes, in the box, both a new pair of earbuds and a two-inch adapter for existing headphones. But those wired approaches are meant to be stopgap measures until we all buy
wireless headphones, which now cost as little as $ 17.
Apple’s inclination to kill of "standard" components in the name of progress is no surprise.
This, after all, was the company that famously eliminated floppy drives, CD-ROM drives and dial-up modems. And it got rid of physical keyboards on smartphones. It has discontinued a series of its own connectors, such as ADB, SCSI, Fire Wire and the original iPhone charging jack. And every single time, the public is outraged.
So the pattern is now clear; The tech companies change some way of doing something.
The public screams bloody murder.
But a couple of years later we’ve all adopted the new technology and forgotten the old one.
It’s probably been years since you pined for the blistering speed of a dial-up modem and a decade since you fished you had a floppy drive. Does that mean we’re stupid and nearsighted? Not exactly. In the case of tech ,
there’s a cost to each of these changes. There’s a monetary cost,
of course. By the time the industry abandoned the floppy-disk and CD-ROM standards, our collections of those disks were rendered worthless. And in the case of
the disappearing headphone jack, there will be the cost of new wireless earbuds. There’s also a learning cost.
Every time
someone takes away a skill we’ve mastered and introduces one we haven’t
, that’s a time-consuming challenge.
There’s even a convenience cost.
During the transitional period to the new standard, we often have to buy and carry some bridge technology
, such as external
DVD drives, U. S. B modems
— or
headphone-jack adapters.
Above all, though ,
there’s a psychological cost to change,
a helpless, primitive "Who moved my cheese?" reaction. As a species, we don’t like lifestyle changes even if logic tells us that we should make them. (See also: climate change, diet, smoking.)
That’s because, at its heart ,
change means leaping into the unknown.
And the unknown — as our Neandertal ancestors approaching a dark cave could have told you — is frightening.
The big tech companies will always want to swat their public along into the future.
In the end,
resistance is futile — but it’s also entirely understandable.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3916023.html
相关试题推荐
Whyarehackersneededinscience?[br][originaltext]Scienceurgentlyneeds
What’sthemotivationtoknowaboutcoworkers’lives?[br][originaltext]To
What’sthemotivationtoknowaboutcoworkers’lives?[originaltext]Tokeept
WhichofthefollowingisNOTtrueaboutnightmares?[br][originaltext]Nigh
WhichofthefollowingisNOTtrueaboutnightmares?[br][originaltext]Nigh
WhichofthefollowingisNOTtrueaboutnightmares?[originaltext]Nightmares
WhatmadeCopakeprosperousinthe1950s?[br][originaltext]Copakeisabout
WhatistheproblemwithphotographyofAfrica?[br][originaltext]Africahasl
WhatistheproblemwithphotographyofAfrica?[br][originaltext]Africahasl
WhatistheproblemwithphotographyofAfrica?[br][originaltext]Africahasl
随机试题
Itisdifficulttoimaginewhatlifewouldbelikewithoutmemory.Themeani
[originaltext]M:Hello,Mary.W:Hi,John.Now,let’sbeginwithaquestion.It
Whatarethechallengesfacingmultinationalsthatwanttobuildtheirbrand
把从静止开始做自由落体运动的物体通过的高度分成相等的三段,则经过这三段的时间比是
A.冻状便 B.灰白色便 C.绿色便 D.鲜血便 E.暗红色果酱样便肠易
坚持以人为本是科学发展观的根本目的、本质和核心;实现经济社会更快更好的发展是科学
麻疹最常见的并发症A.心肌炎 B.胰腺炎 C.睾丸炎 D.肺炎 E.脑炎
地方政府一般债券的发行期限为()年。 Ⅰ1 Ⅱ2 Ⅲ5
患者,女性,60岁。因急性脑出血入院,该患者能予鼻饲进食的时间是A.72小时后
共用题干 一般资料:求助者,女性,21岁,医科大学护理系三年级学生。案例介绍:
最新回复
(
0
)