首页
登录
职称英语
Doctors alone must make the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, inc
Doctors alone must make the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, inc
游客
2025-01-15
12
管理
问题
Doctors alone must make the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, including artificial feeding, and allow a terminally ill patient to die, according to British Medical Association guidelines published yesterday.
They must consult the family, take into account views of the patient and get a second medical opinion. But ultimately the responsibility rests with the doctor, and if the family disagrees it can only challenge his or her decision in the courts.
Members of the BMA’s ethics committee, which produced the guidelines, said they were not a charter for euthanasia.
"This is not about intending to kill people. It is about intending to withdraw what people believe to be useless or non-beneficial interventions," said Raanan Gillon, a GP and professor of medical ethics at Imperial College, London. "It is the difference between foreseeing death as the outcome and intending it."
Opponents of euthanasia rejected this distinction. "I am deeply concerned that some doctors might interpret the guidelines to increase the number of unnatural deaths," said Dr Andrew Fergusson, chairman of the pressure group Healthcare Opposed to Euthanasia.
"I recognize these are very difficult matters, but I am anxious about even more power being given to doctors in the apparent absence of adequate safeguards. This guidance will be bad for some patients."
The BMA has produced the guidelines because of confusion and uncertainly among doctors over how to proceed when treatment is doing more harm than good—perhaps in the case of unsuccessful chemotherapy for cancer—or when a patient is incapacitated after a severe stroke or advanced dementia.
The House of Lords judgment in the 1993 Bland case has muddied the waters. Tony Bland was in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) after the Hillsborough disaster. The courts backed the BMA view that the artificial feeding and hydration through a tube that were keeping him alive were medical treatments.
His father won permission to have all treatments stopped and his son was allowed to die. But the Lords stated that their ruling applied only to patients in PVS and suggested each case should be referred in turn to the courts.
The BMA guidelines make clear that they feel there is no such need in cases other than PVS. These are hard decisions, but doctors are well qualified to make them. If the decision involves stopping artificial nutrition and hydration, which the document accepts is an emotive issue, then a second opinion from a specialist unconnected with the case must be sought.
The doctor must try to ascertain the patient’s own wishes. The views of children under 16 who are capable of understanding must be respected and their parents’ views sought. Living wills requesting no further treatment must be complied with.
With patients who cannot communicate, doctors must consider among other things whether the invasiveness and pain of treatment are justifiable, how likely is any improvement and how aware patients are of the world around them.
The document accuses society of "unrealistic expectations.., about the extent to which it is possible to postpone death."
But SOS-NHS Patients in Danger, a pressure group formed by relatives of patients who have died in hospital, rejected the guidelines outright.
It said: "A terminally iii patient, with weeks, months and (who knows) even years to live would not benefit from having their death hastened for the convenience of medical staff and managers when they and their family might have other plans for how they wish to spend their precious remaining time together." [br] Before making the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, the doctor, according to the guidelines,______.
选项
A、should refer the case to a court for approval
B、should persuade the relatives of the patient to agree to withdrawing treatment
C、should do his best to find out what the patient wants
D、should first consider whether doing so is justifiable from the point of ethics
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3914299.html
相关试题推荐
Whatissuggestedtodobeforemakingadecisiontochange?[br][originaltext]
Whatissuggestedtodobeforemakingadecisiontochange?[br][originaltext]
Theneuroscientistdidastudyinordertotellwhetherchildrenwillfeelthep
Theneuroscientistdidastudyinordertotellwhetherchildrenwillfeelthep
Theneuroscientistdidastudyinordertotellwhetherchildrenwillfeelthep
Theneuroscientistdidastudyinordertotellwhetherchildrenwillfeelthep
[originaltext]IreallycannotdecidewhethertodigupinformationfromtheInt
[originaltext]IreallycannotdecidewhethertodigupinformationfromtheInt
[originaltext]IreallycannotdecidewhethertodigupinformationfromtheInt
[originaltext]Themosteffectivepeoplearethesamewhethertheyarchavinga
随机试题
[originaltext]Interviewer(M)LizVaccariello(W)Now,listentoPartOneofthei
[originaltext]W:Tellme,Peter,whatmakesHarrodssofamous?M:Well,it’sth
Iwas,asitis,inpieces,soulandbody.Ihadreallyforgottenmypastandlo
Whatagesisthecomputergamesuitablefor?[br][originaltext]W:Hi,Mark.Wh
Pregnantwomenwhosufferlapses(忘却)inmemoryorconcentrationmaynolonger
民用建筑低温热水地板辐射采暖的供水温度不应超过:A.90℃ B.80℃ C.
宋代瓷器出现了百花争艳的局面,影响最大的有“五大名窑”。下列不属于“五大名窑”之
砌体结构的构造是确保房屋结构整体性和结构安全的可靠措施,下列关于墙体构造要求的说
加强党的先进性建设,始终是我们党生存、发展、壮大的根本性建设,抓住了先进性建设,
下列关于股权再融资的说法中,不正确的有( )。A.公开增发没有特定的发行对象,认
最新回复
(
0
)