首页
登录
职称英语
I spent the usual long afternoon at work doing little but ordering tests, far
I spent the usual long afternoon at work doing little but ordering tests, far
游客
2025-01-11
43
管理
问题
I spent the usual long afternoon at work doing little but ordering tests, far more than I thought any patient needed, but that’s what we do these days. Guidelines mandate tests, and patients expect them: abnormal tests mean medication, and medication means more tests. My tally for the day: 14 reasonably healthy patients, 299 separate tests of blood composition, three scans and a handful of referrals to specialists for yet more tests.
Teachers complain that primary education threatens to become a process of teaching to the test. They wince as the content of standardized tests increasingly drives their lesson plans, and the results of these tests define their accomplishments. We share their pain: Doctoring to the tests is every bit as dispiriting. Some medical tests are cheap and simple. Some are pricier and more complicated. As in education, our test-ordering behavior and our patients’ results increasingly define our achievements, and in the near future our remuneration is likely to follow. Still, like all test-based quality control systems, ours can be gamed. Our tests can also inflict psychic damage, and physical damage as well. Most distressing: dealing with the endless cycle of repeat testing absorbs much all our time.
It is all in the name of good and equitable health care, a laudable goal. But if you reach age 50 and I cannot persuade you to undergo the colonoscopy or mammogram you really don’t want, am I a bad doctor? If you reach age 85 and I persuade you to take enough medication to normalize your blood pressure, am I a good one? I am not the only one who wonders. A cadre of test skeptics at Dartmouth Medical School specialize in critically examining our test-based approach to well adult care. These folks deserve much of the blame: They have repeatedly demonstrated that these tests and many others do not necessarily make healthy people any healthier.
Dr. H. Gilbert Welch, a Vermont physician who is part of the Dartmouth group, has a new book that might serve as the test skeptic’s manifesto and bible. Its title, "Less Medicine, More Health," sums up his trenchant, point-by-point critique of test-based health care and quality control. In medicine, "true quality is extremely hard to measure," Dr. Welch writes. "What is easy to measure is whether doctors do things. " Only doing things like ordering tests generates data. Deciding not to do things and let well enough alone generates nothing tangible. Dr. Welch points out that doctors get to become doctors because they are good with tests, and know instinctively how to behave in a test-focused universe. Rate them by how many tests they order, and they will order in profusion, often more than the guidelines suggest. They will do fine on assessments of their quality, but patients may not do so well. Even perfectly safe tests that are incapable of doing their own damage may, given enough weight, trigger catastrophe.
Yes, little blood pressure cuff over there in the corner, that means you. The link between very high blood pressure and disease is incontrovertible, and the drugs used to control blood pressure are among the cheapest and safest around. Even so, as Dr. Welch pointed out in a recent conversation, systems that rate doctors by how well their patients’ blood pressure is managed are likely to invite trouble. Doctors rewarded for treating aggressively are likely to keep doing so even when the benefits begin to morph into harm.
That appears to happen in older adults, at least in those who avoid the common complications of high blood pressure and continue on medication. One study found that nursing home residents taking two or more effective blood pressure drugs did remarkably badly, with death rates more than twice that of their peers. In another, dementia patients taking blood pressure medication with optimal results nonetheless deteriorated mentally considerably faster. Yet no quality control system that I know of gives a doctor an approving pat on the head for taking a fragile older patient off meds. Not yet. at least. Someday, perhaps, not ordering and not prescribing will mark quality care as surely as ordering and prescribing do today. For the average healthy, happy adult, let’s be honest: We really haven’t completely figured out why you are in the waiting room. And so we offer a luxuriant profusion of tests. [br] Which of the following can best serve as the title for the passage?
选项
A、Standardized Testing and Medical Tests
B、The Doctor as a Slave to Tests
C、Psychic and Physical Damage Inflicted by Medical Tests
D、Quality Care: Not Ordering and Not Prescribing Medical Tests
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3908197.html
相关试题推荐
Ispenttheusuallongafternoonatworkdoinglittlebutorderingtests,far
Ispenttheusuallongafternoonatworkdoinglittlebutorderingtests,far
[originaltext]Goodafternoon,students.Thetopicfortoday’slectureisHow
[originaltext]Goodafternoon,students.Thetopicfortoday’slectureisHow
[originaltext]Goodafternoon,students.Thetopicfortoday’slectureisHow
[originaltext]Goodafternoon,folks.Intoday’slecture,wetalkaboutthe
[originaltext]Goodafternoon,folks.Intoday’slecture,wetalkaboutthe
[originaltext]Goodafternoon,folks.Intoday’slecture,wetalkaboutthe
"littledidtheEnglishpeopleownhimforhisservice"(paragraphone)meansth
"littledidtheEnglishpeopleownhimforhisservice"(paragraphone)meansth
随机试题
【S1】[br]【S9】which→thattakingtheattitudethat...后面是同位语从句,所以不能用which,应将其改为tha
Itisestimatedthatapproximately350,000managersareneededinChina.Wit
Atschoolwewentoveroursocialnetworkingguidelines.(1)_____theobvious
长江,又名扬子江(theYangtzeRiver),全长6300多千米,是中国第一大河,世界第三大河。长江发源于青藏高原(theQinghai-T
下列关于信用风险的说法错误的是()。A.对大多数商业银行来说,贷款是最大、最明
麝香仁燃烧时的现象是A.随即冒黑烟,出油点,香气浓烈,残渣黄色 B.随即冒黑烟
2020年1—12月,我国稀土及其制品出口量环比上升的月份有几个?A.5
外汇储蓄账户内外汇汇出境外当日累计等值()万美元以下(含)的,凭本人有效身份证
在立井施工中选择HZ-4中心回转抓岩机出渣的优点是()。A.安装使用都很方便
【背景资料】 某施工单位承包了东风水库工程施工,制定的施工方案中部分内容如下:
最新回复
(
0
)