首页
登录
职称英语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week inclu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week inclu
游客
2025-01-05
21
管理
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990. What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not tree. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and 1990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures --5.2 million now, 5.5 million then --are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the. survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’ s too early to tell if that’ s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups--"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background"- and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’ t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing. [br] According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT true about the National Jewish Population Survey?
选项
A、It found a decline of 300,000 Jews in ten years.
B、It was carded out by United Jewish Communities.
C、This is the first time United Jewish Communities has made mistakes in the population survey.
D、The reported decline is not reliable.
答案
C
解析
作者在第四段介绍了United Jewish Communities这一组织,并说到This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm.
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3899884.html
相关试题推荐
SuccessPersonalityAccordingtoaGallupsur
SuccessPersonalityAccordingtoaGallupsur
Hemingwayisa______accordingtoGertrudeSteinA、lostgenerationB、beatgenera
Lowself-esteempopsupregularlyinacademicreportsasanexplanationfora
[originaltext]ReportssayJapanandtheUShavereachedanagreementonthe
[originaltext]ReportssayJapanandtheUShavereachedanagreementonthe
Accordingtothereport,thecontestwilllast______days.[originaltext]SIN
WithTheAdventuresofTomSawyerpublished,MarkTwaingavealiteraryindepend
Accordingtothelaw,childreninBritainbetweentheagesofshouldreceiveeff
Accordingtotheconversation,anapplicationlettershould______.[originaltext
随机试题
Work-lifebalance.Inmostcorporatecircles,it’sthesortofphrasethatg
[originaltext]M:Ijuststoppedbyyourofficeinthebank.Theytoldmethaty
这出戏的情节如此复杂,一般观众简直无法理解。(beyond)TheplotoftheplayisSOcomplicatedthatitis
从试验状态划分,设备安装工程试验划分为静态试验和动态考核两类,动态考核又分为(
下列选项中属于著作权国际保护的基本原则的是( )oA.独立保护原则 B.自动
普通药品的管理是属于A.五级 B.一级 C.二级 D.三级 E.四级
金融期权的卖方可以选择行使他所拥有的权利。期权的买方在缴纳期权费后就承担着在规定
在一定时期内,流通中所需要的货币量取决于下列因素中的( )。A.银行利率和储蓄
(2018年真题)王某与吴某是同学关系。2010年2月王某因结婚需购买住房向吴某
(2015年真题)下列评标委员会成员的行为,合法的是()。A.向招标人征询确
最新回复
(
0
)