首页
登录
职称英语
As more people live closer together, and as they use machines to produce leis
As more people live closer together, and as they use machines to produce leis
游客
2025-01-03
13
管理
问题
As more people live closer together, and as they use machines to produce leisure, they find that their leisure, and even their working hours, become spoilt by a by-product of their machines--namely, noise. Noise is nowadays in the news; it has acquired political status, and public opinion is demanding, more and more insistently, that something be done about it. So it was very appropriate’ that many people professionally interested in noise control should meet to discuss their common problems at a large-scale conference. In the three days of the Conference at Teddington, 25 papers were presented; and faced with the pile of texts, whose contents ranged from sophisticated aerodynamics to general comments on the irritation expressed by neighbours, it was difficult to sort out the new ideas which remain active in one’s mind six months from now, from the big mass of valuable knowledge and facts which will remain on the shelves for reference.
This difficulty was faced by Mr. D. W. Robinson, head of the acoustics work at the National Physical Laboratory. His introduction elaborated the general idea that noise must be considered in relation to the social organism which produces it. Sound becomes annoying noise only when someone’s opinion has made it so. In terms of energy, it is an undesired byproduct, often an exceedingly small fraction of the main output of the machine or process which produces it, and correspondingly difficult to reduce significantly. To control noise is going to demand much self-discipline (annoyance arises often from lack of common courtesy and imagination), a sense of proportion (there is usually a conflict of interest if a noise is to be stopped), the expenditure of money (and it is far more economical to do this early rather than late), and, finally, technical knowledge.
Technical difficulties often arise from the subjective-objective nature of the problem. You can define the excessive speed of a motor Car in terms of a pointer reading on a speedometer. But can you define excessive noise in the same way? The results of several large-scale experiments, involving numbers of vehicles and of listeners, show how difficult it is to fix any instrumental reading as a legal limit in a way which satisfies most of the public and yet is fair to the vehicle owner. You, find, for example, that with any existing simple "noise meter", vehicles which are judged to be equally noisy by a jury may show considerable difference on the meter.
A group of papers dealt with noise, at the source--the basic origins of noise in gears, internal combustion engines, fans and jets. The prospect of a significant reduction in noise output from jet engines of the future was one of the most important questions discussed at the conference. Though the ideal cure for noise is to stop it at its source, this may in many cases be impossible. The next weapon in the anti-noise armory is to absorb it in transit to the ear.
It is a common fallacy that a sound absorbent such as glass wool is opaque to sound and is therefore the best way of diminishing annoying noise from the flat next door. In a normally furnished room, lining a wall with absorbent will have little effect on the noise level built up by reverberation; and will contribute hardly anything to the acoustic opacity of the wall. In a typical factory building, even if all available surfaces are covered with absorbent, the noise level is unlikely to drop by more than five decibels. A consultant will often recommend light partitioning, and partial screening round noisy machines, as a more of the Conference at Teddington, 25 papers were presented; and faced with the pile of texts, whose contents ranged from sophisticated aerodynamics to general comments on the irritation expressed by neighbours, it was difficult to sort out the new ideas which remain active in one’s mind six months from now, from the big mass of valuable knowledge and facts which will remain on the shelves for reference.
This difficulty was faced by Mr. D. W. Robinson, head of the acoustics work at the National Physical Laboratory. His introduction elaborated the general idea that noise must be considered in relation to the social organism which produces it. Sound becomes annoying noise only when someone’s opinion has made it so. In terms of energy, it is an undesired byproduct, often an exceedingly small fraction of the main output of the machine or process which produces it, and correspondingly difficult to reduce significantly. To control noise is going to demand much self-discipline (annoyance arises often from lack of common courtesy and imagination), a sense of proportion (there is usually a conflict of interest if a noise is to be stopped), the expenditure of money (and it is far more economical to do this early rather than late), and, finally, technical knowledge.
Technical difficulties often arise from the subjective-objective nature of the problem. You can define the excessive speed of a motor Car in terms of a pointer reading on a speedometer. But can you define excessive noise in the same way? The results of several large-scale experiments, involving numbers of vehicles and of listeners, show how difficult it is to fix any instrumental reading as a legal limit in a way which satisfies most of the public and yet is fair to the vehicle owner. You, find, for example, that with any existing simple "noise meter", vehicles which are judged to be equally noisy by a jury may show considerable difference on the meter.
A group of papers dealt with noise, at the source--the basic origins of noise in gears, internal combustion engines, fans and jets. The prospect of a significant reduction in noise output from jet engines of the future was one of the most important questions discussed at the conference. Though the ideal cure for noise is to stop it at its source, this may in many cases be impossible. The next weapon in the anti-noise armory is to absorb it in transit to the ear.
It is a common fallacy that a sound absorbent such as glass wool is opaque to sound and is therefore the best way of diminishing annoying noise from the flat next door. In a normally furnished room, lining a wall with absorbent will have little effect on the noise level built up by reverberation; and will contribute hardly anything to the acoustic opacity of the wall. In a typical factory building, even if all available surfaces are covered with absorbent, the noise level is unlikely to drop by more than five decibels. A consultant will often recommend light partitioning, and partial screening round noisy machines, as a more effective and a more economical course.
Domestic noises may perhaps be controlled by forethought and courtesy and industrial noises by good planning and technical improvement. But, if we are going to allow fast motor-cycles and heavy diesel lorries to pass continuously through residential and business property, the community as a whole must decide on the control it needs to exercise, for in the long run, it has got to pay for it. And if a nation is to take a leading part in modern air transport, it must enter into international agreements on the noise control measures it will impose at its airports and here the cost of any real control is immediately to be measured in millions of pounds. [br] What has this report to say about the effectiveness of sound absorbents?
选项
A、Such absorbents as glass wool is the best way of diminishing noise.
B、Lining a wall with absorbent will reduce the noise level considerably.
C、Covering the surfaces of a factory building with absorbent is ineffective in control noise.
D、Screening partially noisy machines will eliminate noise.
答案
C
解析
此题四个选项分别对应第五段的四句话。第一句指出认为glass wool是削减隔壁住房噪音的最好方法是一个谬论(It is a common fallacy),因此A不对。第二句指出在墙上贴吸音材料对噪音的减少影响很少(have little effect on)。第四句指出部分遮蔽噪音大的机器是更有效更经济的方法。但是并没有说这能消除噪音,因此D也不对。第三句提到即使把工厂所有可能的地方贴上吸音材料,噪音也至多减少五分贝,因此选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3897225.html
相关试题推荐
Humanrelationshavecommandedpeople’sattentionfromearlytimes.Theways
Humanrelationshavecommandedpeople’sattentionfromearlytimes.Theways
FivePowerKeysforLeadershipSuccessManypeoplehopeto
FivePowerKeysforLeadershipSuccessManypeoplehopeto
FivePowerKeysforLeadershipSuccessManypeoplehopeto
FivePowerKeysforLeadershipSuccessManypeoplehopeto
Asmorepeopleliveclosertogether,andastheyusemachinestoproduceleis
Asmorepeopleliveclosertogether,andastheyusemachinestoproduceleis
Asmorepeopleliveclosertogether,andastheyusemachinestoproduceleis
Peopleshouldsometimesdothingsthattheydonotenjoydoing.Doyouagree
随机试题
Britainmaynotalwayscheck【C1】______properly,butitissadlygoodaterec
Oneofthemostimportantfeaturesthatdistinguishreadingfromlisteningi
A.各实验组与对照组在非实验因素方面尽可能一致 B.每一实验单位具有同等机会被
模数式伸缩装置的拉伸、压缩时最大水平摩阻力的力学性能指标为()KN/m。A.≤3
慢性风湿性心脏瓣膜病的主要致死原因是A.脑出血 B.心律失常 C.心力衰竭
A.硫黄熏蒸法B.氯化苦熏蒸法C.醋酸钠喷洒D.磷化铝熏蒸法E.稀氨溶液熏蒸法(
“输液pH不在药物稳定范围内”致使硫喷妥钠有可见变化的是A:加入乳酸钠输液中
李女士,28岁,1-0-2-1,曾患慢性肾炎,现停经59天,门诊检查诊断为早孕。
地球自转一圈的时间是一天,地球半径约为6371千米,毛泽东诗词”坐地日行八万里”
科举考试中的糊名、誊录制度确立于( )。A.唐代 B.北宋 C.南宋 D
最新回复
(
0
)