首页
登录
职称英语
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very
游客
2024-12-30
49
管理
问题
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first explosion was detonated. Hearing the sirens and seeing London’s emergency personnel respond to the bombings brought back vivid memories of the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
People have not forgotten Sept. 11, 2001. Americans can still recall exactly where they were and what they were doing on that fateful day. But it’s understandable that some remember it as historical fact, lacking the painful impact and immediacy they originally felt. If we allow a dimming of purpose—to eliminate terrorism—these terrorist attacks in London serve as another chilling reminder that we’re still at war.
Something constructive emerges from these tragic, horrible and unexplainable attacks. It is the message that we must remain vigilant in opposing an enemy who intentionally targets innocent civilians.
Since Sept. 11, 2001, the civilized nations of the world have remained mostly united in opposing these despicable, wanton acts of terror. We have had some great successes in that effort. We have arrested perpetrators and plotters, and we have foiled planned attacks. We have reduced the power and scope of those who despise freedom and democracy.
The effort must continue. As we learned Thursday—and in Madrid and Bali—the enemies of freedom have not lost their resolve. We must not lose ours.
Ultimately, the only real defense from terrorist attacks is being able to find out about them in advance. Intelligence gathering has improved but needs to be even stronger, including consistently improving human intelligence and patrol. Police and ordinary citizens must be alert and encouraged to convey information.
Once a terrorist incident does occur, there’s no such thing as a perfect response. By definition, a terrorist attack means people are being hurt or killed. But by studying the response to past attacks, we can better prepare to handle those in the future.
London is one of the most secure cities in the world, steeped in years of dealing with terrorism. The city’s preparation and resolve was evident on Thursday. I am very impressed by London’s reaction to the bombings. Both the emergency personnel and the citizens seemed prepared. The first responders were rapid, well-directed, organized and professional, in accordance with obviously well-tested plans.
As for the citizens, at least a dozen people told me in one way or another, "We knew this was going to happen; it was just a question of when."
That is not only a realistic assessment; it also is a mindset that just might save lives. Political, business and community leaders are sometimes reluctant to talk about terrorism or stage drills to prepare their response because they don’t want to frighten or upset people. But that’s a mistake. People react to emergencies more effectively when they’re not shocked by them.
Tony Blair and London Mayor Ken Livingstone have made preparedness a priority, and their efforts clearly paid off during Thursday’s response to the attacks.
There’s another benefit to preparing for terrorism in advance. Part of the damage the terrorists hope to inflict is the emotional reaction in the wake of the destruction. The reason it’s called’ "terrorism" is that they want fear and its debilitating effects to linger long after the smoke has cleared.
By preparing citizens for the possibility of a terrorist attack, leaders can help minimize the emotional response in the wake of the destruction.
Finally, Thursday’s attacks demonstrate that we must remain committed to confronting and eliminating terrorism. There are those who assert that the efforts to eliminate terror are somehow provoking the terrorists. That is wrong. The terrorists have been attacking innocent people long before Sept. 11, 2001, or the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.
Seeing Prime Minister Blair speak so forcefully, with President Bush, President Jacques Chirac and other world leaders right behind him; was encouraging. Let’s remember the unity the world shared after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Free nations can and will disagree. But let us always remember that free people must be steadfast and resilient in defending our way of life. [br] A suitable rifle for the passage would be
选项
A、July 7th Terrorist Attack in London.
B、The war against terrorism.
C、Terrorism after Sept.11, 2001.
D、Lessons from terrorist attack in London.
答案
D
解析
本文作者从伦敦恐怖袭击开始写起,接着回顾“9.11"恐怖事件,提醒人们恐怖主义分子依然猖狂,随后用大量篇幅阐述伦敦应对此次事件给我们的经验和教训,最后作者呼吁全世界的自由民族联合起来抵抗恐怖主义。全文章体是对伦敦7月7日恐怖袭击的反思和经验总结,因此选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3891390.html
相关试题推荐
Afterhavingassuredtheirreturnjourney,thewriterandhiscompanioncould
Afterhavingassuredtheirreturnjourney,thewriterandhiscompanioncould
Afterhavingassuredtheirreturnjourney,thewriterandhiscompanioncould
Afterhavingassuredtheirreturnjourney,thewriterandhiscompanioncould
Afterhavingassuredtheirreturnjourney,thewriterandhiscompanioncould
Afterhavingassuredtheirreturnjourney,thewriterandhiscompanioncould
Afterhavingassuredtheirreturnjourney,thewriterandhiscompanioncould
[originaltext]Robinson:Li,IsuggestwedoaquicktourofcentralLondon.As
BigBenisafamous______inLondon.A、statueB、bridgeC、hotelD、clockDBigBen是
Havingsaidallofthis,Ishould,perhaps,locatemyself.Iteachandwritea
随机试题
Nomatterwhatthereason,though,jugglingmorethanonejobisguaranteed
信念伦理在复杂的功利化的现实生活中往往富有理想色彩,高估人们的理性能力,导致对实
取牡丹皮粉末进行微量升华,镜检可见A.黄色针状、片状或羽毛状结晶B.长柱形、针状
本病急性型易引起死亡的原因是A.心律失常 B.贫血 C.感染 D.肾衰竭
()kV变电站可不配置故障录波器。(A)35(B)110(66)(C)2
运行中的并联电容器组电抗器室温度不应超过35℃,当室温超过35℃时,干式三相重迭
【智能站知识】207、当装置检修压板投入时,装置发送的GOOSE报文中的Test
第一次国共合作采取了共产党员以个人身份加入国民党的“党内合作”方式,最早提出这种
对于分离交易的可转换公司债券,发行后累计公司债券余额不得高于最近一期期末公司净
某种经筛选后选定的污染因子在A地的浓度预测值为0.15mg/m3,对应的质量标准
最新回复
(
0
)