首页
登录
职称英语
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: univer
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: univer
游客
2024-11-26
37
管理
问题
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these strange creatures? Are they chief executives or labour leaders? Heads of pre-industrial guilds or champions of one of America’s most successful industries? Defenders of civilisation or merciless rack-renters?
Whatever they might be, they are at the heart of a political firestorm. Anger about the cost of college extends from the preppiest of parents to the grungiest of Occupiers. Mr. Obama is trying to channel the anger, to avoid being sideswiped by it. The White House invitation complained that costs have trebled in the past three decades. Arne Duncan, the secretary of education, has urged universities to address costs with "much greater urgency".
A sense of urgency is justified: ex-students have debts approaching $1 trillion. But calm reflection is needed too. America’s universities suffer from many maladies besides cost. And rising costs are often symptoms of much deeper problems: problems that were irritating during the years of affluence but which are cancerous in an age of austerity.
The first problem is the inability to say "no". For decades American universities have been offering more of everything—more courses for undergraduates, more research students for professors and more rock walls for everybody—on the merry assumption that there would always be more money to pay for it all. The second is Ivy League envy. The vast majority of American universities are obsessed by rising up the academic hierarchy, becoming a bit less like Yokel-U and a bit more like Yale.
Ivy League envy leads to an obsession with research. This can be a problem even in the best universities: students feel short-changed by professors fixated on crawling along the frontiers of knowledge with a magnifying glass. At lower-level universities it causes dysfunction. American professors of literature crank out 70,000 scholarly publications a year, compared with 13,757 in 1959. Most of these simply moulder: Mark Bauerlein of Emory University points out that, of the 16 research papers produced in 2004 by the University of Vermont’s literature department, a fairly representative institution, 11 have since received between zero and two citations. The time wasted writing articles that will never be read cannot be spent teaching. In "Academically Adrift" Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa argue that over a third of America’s students show no improvement in critical thinking or analytical reasoning after four years in college.
Popular anger about universities’ costs is rising just as technology is shaking colleges to their foundations. The Internet is changing the rules. Star academics can lecture to millions online rather than the chosen few in person. Testing and marking can be automated. And for-profit companies such as the University of Phoenix are stripping out costs by concentrating on a handful of popular courses as well as making full use of the Internet. The Sloan Foundation reports that online enrolments grew by 10% in 2010, against 2% for the sector as a whole.
Many universities’ first instinct will be to batten down the hatches and wait for this storm to pass. But the storm is not going to pass. The higher-education industry faces a stark choice: either adapt to a rapidly changing world or face a future of cheeseparing. It is surely better to rethink the career structure of your employees than to see it wither(the proportion of professors at four-year universities who are on track to win tenure fell from 50% in 1997 to 39% ten years later). And it is surely better to reform yourself than to have hostile politicians take you into receivership.
A growing number of universities are beginning to recognise this. They understand that the beginning of wisdom in academia, as in business in general, is choosing what not to do. They are in recovery from their Ivy League envy. They are also striking up relations with private-sector organisations. And a growing number of foundations, such as the Kauffman Foundation, are doing their best to spread the gospel of reform and renewal. [br] What does the fourth paragraph mainly talk about?
选项
A、It continues to analyze the problems.
B、It confirms the seriousness of the problem.
C、It introduces the background of American universities.
D、It shows challenges universities are confronted with.
答案
A
解析
语篇题。直接定位至第四段。第三段末句中的关键词“deeper problems”和第四段首句“The firstproblem is the inability to say‘no’.”又是一个顺承关系,可见第四段是一个承上启下的过渡段,对大学学费增加的问题进行深入地分析,故[A]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3861348.html
相关试题推荐
AccordingtoDr.Getsy,mostpeoplewhocomplainoftroubleinsleepingarethos
AccordingtoDr.Getsy,mostpeoplewhocomplainoftroubleinsleepingarethos
AccordingtoDr.Getsy,mostpeoplewhocomplainoftroubleinsleepingarethos
AccordingtoDr.Getsy,mostpeoplewhocomplainoftroubleinsleepingarethos
WhowerethefirstpeoplethatcametoandsettledinCanada?A、Britishcolonists
Thereasonwhypeopleputonweightatworkisthat[br][originaltext]W:Inth
Thereasonwhypeopleputonweightatworkisthat[br][originaltext]W:Inth
WhoweretheindigenouspeopleofNewZealandbeforethearrivaloftheEuropean
InawindowlessroomontheUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley,campus,two
InawindowlessroomontheUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley,campus,two
随机试题
Whatisthestudent’sproblem?[originaltext]M:Thisbookisduetoday,butIam
本案例中,小张可以确立的工作目标有()A.纠正服务对象的偏差行为 B.改善
肺炎引起化脓性合并症最常见的病原菌是A.金黄色葡萄球菌 B.大肠埃希菌 C.
钢结构焊接中,可以引弧的构件是( )。 A、主要构件 B、次要构件
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性: A.如
孙女士于2004年5月1日从某商场购买一套化妆品,使用后皮肤红肿出疹,就医不愈花
药物与靶标之间通过离子键作用力结合的是
张先生2017年1月购买家庭唯一住房,面积为85平方米,该套住房计征契税的税率为
“固定资产清理”账户的借方登记()。A.转入清理的固定资产账面价值 B.固定
数据电文形式与纸质形式的招标投标活动说法正确的是()A.具有同等法律效力 B.
最新回复
(
0
)