首页
登录
职称英语
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested i
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested i
游客
2024-09-27
42
管理
问题
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed a lawsuit (诉讼) in California claiming that the state’s ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test. (They believed, correctly, that IQ tests are a valid method of evaluating children for special education classes. ) The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child’s physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know &40out any child’s intellectual level, the better for the child in question. [br] The recent legal action taken, by some black parents in California aimed to ______.
选项
A、draw public attention to IQ testing
B、put an end to special education
C、remove the state’s ban on intelligence tests
D、have their children enter white schools
答案
C
解析
细节理解题。诉讼中提到“政府禁止IQ测试是对他们(黑人儿童)的歧视,这样一来他们的子女就不可能进入特殊班级受教育”。指责其不公,自然是要把它取消,所以C项为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3777088.html
相关试题推荐
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedi
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedi
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedi
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
随机试题
"Someliteraryworksaremortal;JaneAusten’sareimmortal,"writesHarold
StayingSmart:AdviceonNavigatingYourCareer
[originaltext]M:Hi,Lesley!DidyougototheKentCentretovotelastweek?W
()不属于大型项目控制的三要素。A.项目绩效跟踪 B.质量改进 C
中国的“月亮城”是指( )。A.扬州 B.南京 C.无锡 D.苏州
某熔炼炉厂房炉前钢平台主梁G1-1为单跨带悬臂段简支梁,采用焊接H型钢H1200
有担保流动资金贷款的利率按中国人民银行规定的同期同档次贷款利率执行,在贷款期限内
一住店客人未付房钱即想离开旅馆去车站。旅馆服务员揪住他不让走,并打报警电话。客人
妇人带下病,证属脾肾两虚,治以补脾、益肾、止带,宜选用的药物是A.黄芪 B.人
下列属于承包人违约的情形是()。A.监理人无正当理由没有在约定期限内发出复工指
最新回复
(
0
)