首页
登录
职称英语
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being
游客
2024-08-03
50
管理
问题
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they serve students. It has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade professors as for professors to grade students.
In fact, student ratings have become the most widely used—and, in many cases, the only—source of information on teaching effectiveness. In comparing three studies of the same 600 four-year colleges, it was found that the number of colleges using student ratings to evaluate teachers had climbed from 29 percent to 68 percent. No other method of evaluation approached that degree of usage, and other studies have found similar results.
One reason that student evaluations of teachers have become so popular is that they are easy to administer and to score. But they also are easy to abuse. If they are to shed meaningful light on teachers’ performance, the ratings must be used in a way that reflects at least some of what we’ve learnt about them from research and from experience.
Research and experience have shown us, for example, that student ratings should never be the only basis for evaluating teaching effectiveness. There is much more to teaching than what is evaluated on student rating forms. When ratings are used, we know that students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used in a course are up to date or how well the teacher knows the subject matter of the course. These judgments require professional background and are best left to the professor’s colleagues. On the other hand, students should be asked to estimate what they have learned in a course, and to report on such things as a professor’s ability to communicate at the students’ level, professional behaviour in the classroom, relationship with students, and ability to arouse interest in the subject. [br] In student ratings all the following questions can be asked EXCEPT______.
选项
A、Can the teacher make himself easily understood?
B、How does the teacher deal with students?
C、Is what is taught new?
D、Are students interested in what is taught?
答案
C
解析
该题目一方面考查考生对细节的把握,另一方面考查考生能否理解文章中的一些话语。本题答案来自全文最后一句,A)对应abilityto communicate at the students’level;B)对应relationship with students;D)对应ability toarouse interest in the subject,这三项都可以在学生评价体系中提问,因此可排除。C)实际上是对应第四段第三句中的whether the materials usedin a course are up to date,这类问题应由教师的同事来回答,不属于询问学生的问题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3703814.html
相关试题推荐
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
Fatcannotchangeintomuscle______musclechangesintofat.A、anymorethanB、no
Historically,dictionarieshavebeenthoughtofasdullandmechanicalwhich
随机试题
TheBody-dataCrazeA)W
Hungryprehistorichunters,notclimatechange,droveelephantstoextinctio
Agrowingnumberofbusinessesareconvertingtemporaryworkerstopermanent
编辑加工整理与审稿的关系错误的一项是( )。A.编辑加工整理必须在稿件经过审稿
系统频率特性和传递函数的关系为( )。A.两者完全是一样的 B.传递函数
悬臂拼装施工方法的优点是场地较小,浇筑模板及设备基本需要移机,浇筑时,台座一般仅
急性型再生障碍性贫血早期最突出的表现是A、出血和感染 B、进行性贫血 C、进
幼儿园的环境刨设主要是指( )。A.购买大型玩具 B.安装塑胶地板 C.合
某三相异步电动机的额定电压为380/220V,若电源电压为380V,则下面4个图
1.西柏坡,原是河北省平山县一个普通的小山村,群山环绕,滹沱河从村前流过,两岸滩
最新回复
(
0
)