首页
登录
职称英语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
游客
2024-08-03
38
管理
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as nanny-state social engineering gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity(肥胖症)rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic(慢性的)disease?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of rich and poor. Because its level of income disparity(差异)is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor that in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases. [br] In Denmark, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor because______.
选项
A、the level of income disparity is relatively low
B、the purpose of taxing is to improve economy
C、the taxes aim at softening the shock of climate change
D、the taxes make products more expensive
答案
A
解析
由题干中的effects of health taxes,less hard on the poor定位到第四段第二句。该句指出因为丹麦收入差异相对较低,因此健康税对穷人的影响比其他国家小,由此可见A)最恰当。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3703499.html
相关试题推荐
WhatdowelearnaboutDenmark’senergyproject?[originaltext]Denmarkhascome
[originaltext]Fallingticketpricesandrisingincomesareleadingtorapid
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
随机试题
恶性肿瘤病人化疗期间,白细胞降至3×10/L,正确的处理是A.加强营养 B.加
药物的作用是指:A.药物改变器官的功能 B.药物改变器官的代谢 C.药物引起
体重为12kg,身长85cm,头围48cm,胸围49cm的小儿年龄是:(
某派出所干警30人,平均年龄35岁,全部为男性吸烟者28人,人均日吸烟量30根。
下列对检测结直肠癌术后复发最有意义的肿瘤相关抗原是A.PSA B.CEA C
一个学生恶作剧给一个老师背后贴了乌龟,被老师打了一巴掌,你怎么看?
女性,56岁,身高155cm,体重55kg,体检发现空腹血糖6.4mmol/L,
阅读下面的文章,按要求回答问题: 论诚意 朱自清 诚伪是品性,却又是态度。
下列成本加酬金合同计价形式中,最难以控制成本的是()。A.成本加固定百分比酬金
造成设备无形磨损的原因有()。A.高强度的使用导致设备自然寿命缩短 B.自然力
最新回复
(
0
)