首页
登录
职称英语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
游客
2024-08-03
40
管理
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as nanny-state social engineering gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity(肥胖症)rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic(慢性的)disease?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of rich and poor. Because its level of income disparity(差异)is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor that in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases. [br] What was the aim of the major tax overhaul of Denmark in 2009?
选项
A、Decreasing the chronic disease rate.
B、Softening the shock of the global economic crisis.
C、Prohibiting the production of unhealthy food.
D、Changing medical conditions.
答案
B
解析
由题干中的aim,the major tax,Denmark in 2009定位到第三段第二句。该句指出,2009年丹麦政府宣布进行税收制度的全面改革,旨在缓解全球经济危机带来的打击、鼓励使用再生能源、保护环境、减缓气候变化并改善人们的健康状况,由此看出B)最符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3703497.html
相关试题推荐
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
随机试题
下列关于衍生品交易的描述,不正确的是()。A、期货交易是衍生品交易的一种重要类型B、并非所有的衍生品交易都在交易所内进行C、衍生品交易所内的交易规模
他在这所学校教多久了?Howlonghashebeenteachinginthisschool?
Businesseslargeand【C1】______,nowrealizethatphysicalworkspaceinfluenc
[originaltext]Televisionnowplayssuchanimportantpartinsomanypeople
某确定的有限自动机(DFA)的状态转换图如下图所示(A是初态,D、E是
患儿男,3岁。发现颈部圆形包块1年,逐渐增大3个月。查体:颈部后三角区可见一鸭蛋
关于自助式前台系统的要求,下列说法错误的是。()A.自助式前台系统应当对基金投
(2020年真题)通过抑制A型单胺氧化酶,减少去甲肾上腺素、5-HT及多巴胺的降
如果责任保险采用索赔发生制保险单,当被保险人不准备再续保时,可以附加投保(
男性,48岁,酗酒后9小时出现中上腹疼痛,放射至两侧腰部,伴恶心、呕吐。体检:腹
最新回复
(
0
)