首页
登录
职称英语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
游客
2024-08-02
34
管理
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as nanny-state social engineering gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity(肥胖症)rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic(慢性的)disease?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of rich and poor. Because its level of income disparity(差异)is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor that in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases. [br] In Denmark, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor because______.
选项
A、the level of income disparity is relatively low
B、the purpose of taxing is to improve economy
C、the taxes aim at softening the shock of climate change
D、the taxes make products more expensive
答案
A
解析
由题干中的effects of health taxes,less hard on the poor定位到第四段第二句。该句指出因为丹麦收入差异相对较低,因此健康税对穷人的影响比其他国家小,由此可见A)最恰当。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3702360.html
相关试题推荐
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
RupertBrookeRupertBrooke,oneoftheleading
RupertBrookeRupertBrooke,oneoftheleading
随机试题
StudentexpeditionsdoagreatdealofgoodworkontheArcticislandsbutf
FormanyAmericans,2013endedwithanunusuallybittercoldspell.LateNov
MyFirstExperiencewithAIDSPatients
HighlightingIsaWasteofTimeA)Inaworldasfast-changin
以下关于配置项的描述中,不正确的是()A.使用配置管理工具后,所有配置项要以一定
磷酸吸氨法生产无水氨工艺,是用磷酸溶液从焦炉煤气中选择性吸收氨,吸氨的磷铵富溶液
下列关于开放式基金的销售服务费的说法,正确的有( ) Ⅰ.一般货币市场基金从
企业财务预算包括:A.预算利润表 B.制造费用预算 C.预算现金流量表
检索计数调整型一次正常抽样方案需要明确的检索要素是()。 A.批量B.样
(2016年真题)下列关于借款人义务的说法中,错误的是()。A.应当如实提
最新回复
(
0
)