首页
登录
职称英语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are
游客
2024-08-01
43
管理
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as a nanny state whose social engineering has gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity (肥胖症) rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic (慢性的) diseases?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of the rich and the poor. Because its level of income disparity (差异) is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor than in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases. [br] What was the aim of the major tax overhaul of Denmark in 2009?
选项
A、Decreasing the chronic disease rate.
B、Softening the shock of the global economic crisis.
C、Prohibiting the production of unhealthy food.
D、Changing medical conditions.
答案
B
解析
由题干中的aim、major tax overhaul 和Denmark in 2009定位到第三段第二句。该句指出,2009年丹麦政府宣布进行税收制度的全面改革,旨在缓解全球经济危机带来的打击、鼓励使用再生能源、保护环境、减缓气候变化并改善人们的健康状况等,由此看出B)最符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3701562.html
相关试题推荐
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
SeniorAccountExecutive(总监)Atlanta,aleadingmarketing,design&prod
Giveupsmoking.Your(healthy)______willimprovesoon.health根据原句中的语法要求,物主代词you
Giveupsmoking.Your(healthy)______willimprovesoon.health根据原句中的语法要求,物主代词yo
Inordertostayhealthy,itisagoodidea______yourdoctoratleastonceay
Ibas—CenterofExcellenceIbasisoneoftheworld’sleadingcompaniesinDataR
Exercisescanhelpuskeep(health)______.healthy句子意为:运动可以帮助我们保持健康。本题测试词性变化。kee
Giveupsmoking.Your(healthy)______willimprovesoon.health根据原句中的语法要求,物主代词yo
Readingisagreeableaswellas(health)______tohumanbeings.healthy本题考查语法。根据句子
随机试题
下列关于新能源的说法正确的是()。A.新能源的各种形式都是间接地来自于太
澳门历史城区是中国境内现存最古老、规模最大、保存最完整、最集中的中西特色建筑共存
对药物胃肠道吸收无影响的是A.胃排空的速率 B.胃肠液pH C.药物的解离常
简支梁受分布荷载如图示,支座A、B的约束力为( )。
在确定物业服务企业的费用分摊时,不应考虑()。A:物业服务企业的主营业务和兼营
患者男性,29岁,阴茎头部出现下疳两个月就诊。有不洁性接触史。临床诊断为梅毒。立
根据《劳动合同法》劳动合同期限一年以上不满三年的,试用期不得超过( )。A.4
按《建设工程工程量清单计价规范》(GB50500-2013)规定,工程量清单的组
患者,男性,30岁。体检时发现精索静脉曲张。关于精索静脉曲张,错误的是A:原发性
依据《生产安全事故报告和调查处理条例》的规定,事故发生单位负责人接到事故报告后,
最新回复
(
0
)