首页
登录
职称英语
For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, us
For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, us
游客
2024-06-03
62
管理
问题
For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, using science for the construction of what we call modem civilization. Every dispensable item of contemporary technology, from canal locks to dial telephones to penicillin, was pieced together from the analysis of data provided by one or another series of scientific experiments. Three hundred years seems a long time for testing a new approach to human inter-living, long enough to set back for critical appraisal of the scientific method, maybe even long enough to vote on whether to go on with it or not. There is an argument.
Voices have been raised in protest since the beginning, rising in pitch and violence in the nineteenth century during the early stages of the industrial revolution, summoning urgent crowds into the streets on the issue of nuclear energy. "Give it back," say some of the voices, "It doesn’t really work, we’ve tried it and it doesn’t work. Go back three hundred years and start again on something else less chancy for the race of man."
The principle discoveries in this century, taking all in all, are the glimpses of the depth of our ignorance of nature. Things that used to seem clear and rational, end matters of absolute certainty—Newtonian mechanics, for example—have slipped through our fingers; and we are left with a new set of gigantic puzzles, cosmic uncertainties, and ambiguities. Some of the laws of physics are amended every few years; some are canceled outright; some undergo revised versions of legislative intent as if they were acts of Congress.
Just thirty years ago we call it a biological revolution when the fantastic geometry of the DNA molecule was exposed to public view and the linear language of genetics was decoded. For a while, things seemed simple and clear: the cell was a neat little machine, a mechanical device ready for taking to pieces and reassembling, like a tiny watch. But just in the last few years it has become almost unbelievably complex, filled with strange parts whose functions are beyond today’s imagining.
It is net just that there is more to do, there is everything to do. What lies ahead, or what can lie ahead if the efforts in basic research are continued, is much more than the conquest of human disease or the improvement of agricultural technology or the cultivation of nutrients in the sea. As we learn more about fundamental processes of living things in general we will learn more about ourselves. [br] Now scientists have found in the past few years ______.
选项
A、the exposure of DNA to the public is unnecessary
B、the tiny cell in DNA is a neat little machine
C、man knows nothing about DNA
D、man has much to learn about DNA
答案
D
解析
推断题。由文章第四段可知,30年前人们将DNA的发现称为生物革命,刚开始时,人们认为DNA细胞很简单,但随着时间的推移,人们发现它其实极为复杂,由此推断,人们还需要进一步研究,所以D正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3618083.html
相关试题推荐
Foraboutthreecenturieswehavebeendoingscience,tryingscienceout,us
Foraboutthreecenturieswehavebeendoingscience,tryingscienceout,us
Foraboutthreecenturieswehavebeendoingscience,tryingscienceout,us
[originaltext]Sciencefictionwritershaveoftenimaginedhumanbeingsgoin
TheScienceofInterruptionsIn2000,Gl
TheScienceofInterruptionsIn2000,Gl
TheScienceofInterruptionsIn2000,Gl
TheScienceofInterruptionsIn2000,Gl
TheScienceofInterruptionsIn2000,Gl
Manyobjectsindailyusehaveclearlybeeninfluencedbyscience.However,
随机试题
Thecentralproblemineconomicsisthatof______.A、comparingthesuccessofcom
About84%ofpeoplehavementalhealthproblemsandathirdoftheUKgener
Itis__________.[originaltext]Whatiscritical?[/originaltext]howtoselectthe
AccordingtoBrickland,parentsnowadayshavechangedtheir______.[br]BobbleS
关于酸性磷酸酶染色,下列叙述不正确的是A.用于多毛细胞白血病的诊断 B.用于脂
关于胎儿成熟度,下列选项不正确的是A.B超胎头双顶径值>8.5cm,提示胎儿已经
现制备剂量为0.08g毒性药物的散剂,一般需制成的倍散为A1:15 B1:20
芦荟∶耐旱∶胡杨树A.钝化液∶防锈∶机油泵 B.抗生素∶消炎∶感冒药 C.保
牛腿尺寸如图所示,结构安全等级为二级,柱截面宽度b=400mm,高度h=600m
胆固醇不能转变成A.维生素D B.雄激素 C.雌激素 D.醛固酮 E.胆
最新回复
(
0
)