首页
登录
职称英语
A famous US climate scientist at the centre of the "climategate’ has been
A famous US climate scientist at the centre of the "climategate’ has been
游客
2024-05-29
40
管理
问题
A famous US climate scientist at the centre of the "climategate’ has been virtually cleared of professional misconduct by an internal university inquiry. Michael Mann of Penn State University featured regularly in the more than 1 000 emails that were hacked from the University of East Anglia (UEA) in the UK last November. His emails and comments have since then featured in countless blogs and news articles. Some have claimed the emails reveal that many climate scientists have changed data in order to demonstrate that climate change is caused by human activities. The scientists in the emails, including Mann, have also been accused of seeking to prevent the publication of doubting research in academic journals.
Penn State University opened an inquiry into Mann’s behavior in November, shortly after the emails were leaked into the public attention. After going through 1 075 emails and focusing on that were believed relevant to public idea of misconduct by Mann, the inquiry has, by and large, cleared his name. The internal inquiry has found that Mann did not participate in, directly or indirectly, any actions to hide or change data, nor did he remove or otherwise destroy emails, information and/or data relating to Climate Change’s 2007 report. One email that has received much media attention was sent to Mann by Phil Jones, then director of the UEA’s Climatic Research Unit. It asked Mann to delete some emails regarding the 2007 IPCC report.
The report is not clear about whether Mann’s behavior has harmed the public trust in science, it cites Penn State’s official ethical standards, which says faculty have an obligation to maintain high moral standards in order to raise public trust in science. It then goes on to discuss the fallout from the email leak which, it says, may have driven the public into two camps: one that believes the leak harms climate science and another that does not. "After careful consideration of all the evidence and relevant materials, the inquiry committee could not make a definitive finding whether there exists any evidence to prove that Dr. Mann did engage in, or participate in, directly or indirectly, any actions against accepted academic practices," reads the report. This final point will now be at the centre of a further investigation.
"This is very much the proof I expected since I am confident I have done nothing wrong," Mana told New Scientist. "I fully support the additional inquiry which may be the best way to remove any remaining doubts." [br] Mann told New Scientist that he hoped to have more inquiry to ______.
选项
答案
remove any remaining doubts
解析
细节归纳题。本题考查曼恩欢迎更多的调查的原因。文中最后表明了曼恩对该事件的态度,他对《新科学家》说他欢迎更多的调查,因为这可能才是澄清怀疑的最好方法。归纳起来可知,答案为remove any remaining doubts。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3610210.html
相关试题推荐
Climatescientistsneedtoswallowtheirmistrustsandsharetheirdataa
Climatescientistsneedtoswallowtheirmistrustsandsharetheirdataa
AfamousUSclimatescientistatthecentreofthe"climategate’hasbeen
AfamousUSclimatescientistatthecentreofthe"climategate’hasbeen
AfamousUSclimatescientistatthecentreofthe"climategate’hasbeen
Everylivingthinghaswhatscientistscallabiologicalclockthatcontrols
Everylivingthinghaswhatscientistscallabiologicalclockthatcontrols
Everylivingthinghaswhatscientistscallabiologicalclockthatcontrols
Everylivingthinghaswhatscientistscallabiologicalclockthatcontrols
Everylivingthinghaswhatscientistscallabiologicalclockthatcontrols
随机试题
[originaltext]Youhavethedayofftomorrow,don’tyou?(A)Healreadyplanned
ThingstobeTaughtinEverySchoolI.Introduction:Importanceofstudents’
在设计心理学实验研究时,实验者必须要考虑的因素有()。A.自变量 B.因
A.1%B.3%C.2%D.13%E.15%药材炒黄的要求是药屑、杂质不得超过
判断低血糖的血浆葡萄糖浓度是A:<2.8mmol/LB:<3.0mmol/L
在对待传统道德的问题上.要反对两种错误思潮.一种是文化复古主义思潮.另一种是全盘
属于水肿脾败不治的是A.脐满反肿者 B.掌肿无纹理 C.阴肿不起 D.腰肿
甲公司为上市公司,适用所得税税率为25%,所得税采用资产负债表债务法核算,当年发
隧道穿越的岩层主要是坚硬岩,岩体较完整,块状或厚层状结构;该隧道的围岩分级为(
以下对于给水管道安装顺序说法正确的是( )。A.防冻、防结露完成后进行水压试验
最新回复
(
0
)