首页
登录
职称英语
Economists have long recognized what’s been named the "beauty premium" — the
Economists have long recognized what’s been named the "beauty premium" — the
游客
2024-05-19
42
管理
问题
Economists have long recognized what’s been named the "beauty premium" — the idea that pretty people,whatever their aspirations,tend to do better in most aspects of their lives. It is believed that handsome men earn 5 percent more than their least-attractive counterparts; that pretty people get more attention from teachers,bosses,and friends. A recent NEWSWEEK survey of corporate hiring managers confirmed how many of these assumptions carry over into the workplace—placing the importance of looks below experience but above education when it comes to landing a job.
But however hard men have it at work—and, from a financial perspective, their beauty premium is higher,say economists—women will always face a double bind;pressured to conform to the beauty standards of the day, yet simultaneously condemned for doing so. Recruiters may think women can get ahead by looking good,but nearly half also believe it’s possible for a woman to be penalized for being "too good-looking" . Attractive women tend to face heightened monitor from their female peers, who rate them less competent,less talented,less loyal,and,strangely,less motherly than women from homelier stock. In male-dominated fields in particular,pretty women can be seen as too feminine for leadership positions.
In what’s known as the " beauty is beastly" effect, one recent study even found that attractive women are likely discriminated against outright—at least when it comes to hiring. Published in the June issue of the Journal of Social Psychology, the study gave volunteers a list of jobs, along with photos of men and women suitable for those jobs, and then asked them to place the photos with the categories. For jobs with titles like director of security, hardware salesperson, prison guard, and tow-truck driver, attractive women were overlooked, sorted instead into positions like receptionist and secretary. The same was true among more professional categories, like manager of research, director of finance, or mechanical engineer.
This wasn’t the case with men. Is it any surprise that women face a double standard? Not to this writer. The reality is that though looks may be undeniably important,they aren’t everything,and even the most superficial statistics still leave room for talent. Beauty premium notwithstanding, there are still opportunities for people who aren’t runway models—and lots of them. [br] According to economists,pretty people,in most aspects of their lives,are likely to______.
选项
答案
do better
解析
定位句指出,经济学家认为外貌出众的人倾向于在人生中大多数方面都要表现得更出色。原文中的tend to与题于中的are likely to属于同义转换,故本题答案为do better。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3602210.html
相关试题推荐
Economistshavelongrecognizedwhat’sbeennamedthe"beautypremium"—the
Economistshavelongrecognizedwhat’sbeennamedthe"beautypremium"—the
Economistshavelongrecognizedwhat’sbeennamedthe"beautypremium"—the
Livingstandardshavesoaredduringthe21stcentury,andeconomistsexpect
Livingstandardshavesoaredduringthe21stcentury,andeconomistsexpect
Livingstandardshavesoaredduringthe21stcentury,andeconomistsexpect
Livingstandardshavesoaredduringthe21stcentury,andeconomistsexpect
Livingstandardshavesoaredduringthe21stcentury,andeconomistsexpect
Livingstandardshavesoaredduringthe21stcentury,andeconomistsexpect
Livingstandardshavesoaredduringthe21stcentury,andeconomistsexpect
随机试题
说明:假定你是一名大学生,叫李玉(女),月收入在500元以下。于2006年7月5日去超市购物,临走时填了一份问卷调查表。内容如下:1.每月大概光
A—menuB—passwordC—accountD—fullscreenE—updateF—operationsystemG—saveas
[originaltext]W:IcouldhavemadethehighestgradeonthisexamifIhadn’tm
IntroductiontoM.deI’AubepineM.deI’Aubepineisun
狭义的质量功能展开就是把形成质量的(),按目的手段系列中的步骤进行详细的展开
建筑物内的设备管道夹层()建筑物面积。A.算在 B.不算在 C.算1/2在
患者,男性,60岁,尿毒症。因食欲减低,24小时尿量90ml来院就诊。查体:精神
1949年在芝加哥大学的一次科学会议上,正式提出了“()”这一新的名称,以替代人
药品不良反应因果关系评定依据不包括()。A.时间相关性 B.文献合理性
甲建设单位与乙设计单位签订了设计合同,合同约定设计费为200万元,定金为设计费的
最新回复
(
0
)