首页
登录
职称英语
Trying too Hard Can Slow New Language DevelopmentA)Neuroscienti
Trying too Hard Can Slow New Language DevelopmentA)Neuroscienti
游客
2024-04-22
44
管理
问题
Trying too Hard Can Slow New Language Development
A)Neuroscientists have long observed that learning a language presents a different set of opportunities and challenges for adults and children.
B)Adults easily grasp the vocabulary needed to navigate a grocery store or order food in a restaurant, but children have an innate ability to pick up on subtle nuances of language that often elude adults. For example, within months of living in a foreign country, a young child may speak a second language like a native speaker.
C)Experts believe that brain structure plays an important role in this "sensitive period" for learning language, which is believed to end around adolescence. The young brain is equipped with neural circuits that can analyze sounds and build a coherent set of rules for constructing words and sentences out of those sounds. Once these language structures are established, it’ s difficult to build another one for a new language.
D)In a new study, a team of neuroscientists and psychologists from Massachusetts Institute of Technology(MIT)discovered another factor that contributes to adults’ language difficulties: When learning certain elements of language, adults’ more highly developed cognitive skills actually get in the way.
E)The researchers discovered that the harder adults tried to learn an artificial language, the worse they were at deciphering the language’ s morphology—the structure and deployment of linguistic units such as root words, suffixes, and prefixes.
F)"We found that effort helps you in most situations, for things like figuring out what the units of language that you need to know are, and basic ordering of elements. But when trying to learn morphology, at least in this artificial language we created, it’ s actually worse when you try," said Amy Flynn a postdoc at MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research.
G)Finn and colleagues from the University of California at Santa Barbara, Stanford University, and the University of British Columbia describe their findings in journal PLOS ONE.
H)Linguists have known for decades that children are skilled at absorbing certain tricky elements of language, such as irregular past participles(examples of which, in English, include "gone" and "been")or complicated verb tenses like the subjunctive. "Children will ultimately perform better than adults in terms of their command of the grammar and the structural components of language—some of the more idiosyncratic, difficult-to-articulate aspects of language that even most native speakers don’ t have conscious awareness of," Finn says.
I)In 1990, linguist Elissa Newport hypothesized that adults have trouble learning those nuances because they try to analyze too much information at once. Adults have a much more highly developed prefrontal cortex than children, and they tend to throw all of that brainpower at learning a second language.
J)This high-powered processing may actually interfere with certain elements of learning language. "It’ s an idea that’ s been around for a long time, but there hasn’ t been any data that experimentally show that it’s true," Finn says. Finn and her colleagues designed an experiment to test whether exerting more effort would help or hinder success.
The study
K)First, they created nine nonsense words, each with two syllables. Each word fell into one of three categories(A, B, and C), defined by the order of consonant and vowel sounds. Study subjects listened to the artificial language for about 10 minutes. One group of subjects was told not to overanalyze what they heard, but not to tune it out either.
L)To help them not overthink the language, they were given the option of completing a puzzle or colouring while they listened. The other group was told to try to identify the words they were hearing. Each group heard the same recording, which was a series of three-word sequences—first a word from category A, then one from category B, then category C—with no pauses between words.
M)Previous studies have shown that adults, babies, and even monkeys can parse this kind of information into word units, a task known as word segmentation. Subjects from both groups were successful at word segmentation, although the group that tried harder performed a little better. Both groups also performed well in a task called word ordering, which required subjects to choose between a correct word sequence(ABC)and an incorrect sequence(such as ACB)of words they had previously heard.
N)The final test measured skill in identifying the language’s morphology. The researchers played a three-word sequence that included a word the subjects had not heard before, but which fit into one of the three categories.
O)When asked to judge whether this new word was in the correct location, the subjects who had been asked to pay closer attention to the original word stream performed much worse than those who had listened more passively. The findings support a theory of language acquisition that suggests that some parts of language are learned through procedural memory, while others are learned through declarative memory.
P)Under this theory, declarative memory, which stores knowledge and facts, would be more useful for learning vocabulary and certain rules of grammar. Procedural memory, which guides tasks we perform without conscious awareness of how we learned them, would be more useful for learning subtle rules related to language morphology.
Q)"It’s likely to be the procedural memory system that’s really important for learning these difficult morphological aspects of language. In fact, when you use the declarative memory system, it doesn’t help you, it harms you," Finn says. Still unresolved is the question of whether adults can overcome this language-learning obstacle. Finn says she does not have a good answer yet but she is now testing the effects of "turning off" the adult prefrontal cortex using a technique called transcranial magnetic stimulation.
R)Other interventions she plans to study include distracting the prefrontal cortex by forcing it to perform other tasks while language is heard, and treating subjects with drugs that impair activity in that brain region. [br] One theory of language acquisition suggests that language are learned through both procedural and declarative memory.
选项
答案
O
解析
本题意为语言习得的一个理论认为语言是由程序记忆和陈述性记忆习得的。题干中名词language acquisition为关键词,对应点出现在文章O段Thefindings support a theory of language acquisition that suggests that some parts oflanguage are learned through procedural memory,while others are learned throughdeclarative memory.“研究结果与语言习得的一个理论相符.那就是,语言的某些部分是通过程序记忆学习来的,然而其他的一些是由陈述性记忆习得的。”
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3566103.html
相关试题推荐
TryingtooHardCanSlowNewLanguageDevelopmentA)Neuroscienti
TryingtooHardCanSlowNewLanguageDevelopmentA)Neuroscienti
TryingtooHardCanSlowNewLanguageDevelopmentA)Neuroscienti
TryingtooHardCanSlowNewLanguageDevelopmentA)Neuroscienti
RelationshipTalkingPoints:SpeakYourSpouse’sLanguageA)Anna
RelationshipTalkingPoints:SpeakYourSpouse’sLanguageA)Anna
RelationshipTalkingPoints:SpeakYourSpouse’sLanguageA)Anna
RelationshipTalkingPoints:SpeakYourSpouse’sLanguageA)Anna
RelationshipTalkingPoints:SpeakYourSpouse’sLanguageA)Anna
RelationshipTalkingPoints:SpeakYourSpouse’sLanguageA)Anna
随机试题
In1978onlyhalfthewomengrantedchildsupportbyacourtreceivedtheamount
如果主存容量为16M字节,且按字节编址,表示该主存地址至少多少位?()A.16
超声诊断急性胆囊炎的要点为A.胆囊肿大,胆囊壁水肿且有压痛,胆汁透声差 B.胆
下面哪种方法不能除去热原A.加热法 B.离子交换法 C.酸碱法 D.反渗透
根据材料,如果2010年该企业税负增长率维持在2009年的水平上,2010年的税
(2016年11月)因劳动者本人原因给用人单位造成经济损失的,可从劳动者工资中扣
心交感神经末梢释放的递质是A.去甲肾上腺素 B.乙酰胆碱 C.肾上腺素 D
PM2.5是指大气中直径小于或等于2.5微米的颗粒物,也称为可入肺颗粒物。(
当对一关键工作延误采取措施时,合理的结论是( )。A.尽早调整紧邻后续关键工序
乡村医生老张,参加助理医师资格考试未合格,仍在县城某诊所执业,卫生行政部门处置哪
最新回复
(
0
)