首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2024-02-19
42
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] The phrase "to get their own back on the teachers" (Line 2, Para. 3) most probably means that the students would ______.
选项
A、have their revenge on the teachers
B、be at their teachers’ back
C、assess their teachers back to back
D、turn their back on the teachers
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3463608.html
相关试题推荐
Ifyouexplainedyoursituationtoteacher,he______(能给你更好的建议).wouldbeablet0
A、Talkwithherteacher.B、Talkwithherfriend.C、Talkwithherclassmates.D、T
A、TaughtherEnglishherself.B、Wenttotalkwithherteacher.C、Signedupfora
Somepeople______avoidquestionsofrightorwrongandremainneutralaboutth
HowcanIeverconcentrateifyouarecontinually______mewithsillyquestions
Duringtheirfirstteacher-trainingyear,thestudentsoftenvisitedlocalschoo
Alltheteacherswhohavetaughtmedeserved______admiration.A、respectedB、respe
Mymotherwasalwaysaskingquestions,andit______measoddthatshedidn’ta
Ateachershouldnotshow______foranyoneofhispupilsnorgetangryeasily
Parents’Homework:FindPerfectTeachersforKidsTomiHall
随机试题
DealingwithFearsAllchildren
【T1】中国政府70年间成功实现8.5亿人摆脱贫困。(lift)仅改革开放40多年来,中国就有7.5亿人脱贫。特别是中共十八大以来,中国政府把脱贫攻坚
Manycountrieshaveaholidaytocelebrateworkers’rightsonoraroundMay
在气相色谱中,调整保留时间实际上反映了()分子间的相互作用A.组分与载气
重力大小为W的物块能在倾斜角为α的粗糙斜面上下滑,为了维持物块在斜面上平衡,在物
网络隔离的关键在于系统对通信数据的控制,即通过隔离设备在网络之间不存在物理连接的
下图为某年4月30日20时亚洲局部地区海平面气压分布图。 此刻
如套管的伞裙间距低于规定标准,可采取加硅橡胶伞裙套等措施,不必进行套管放电量测试
国务院和县级以上地方人民政府改善薄弱学校的办学条件.保障农村地区、民族地区实施义
下列哪项是急性坏死型胰腺炎的特点A.上腹部持续刀割样疼痛 B.剧烈恶心、呕吐
最新回复
(
0
)