首页
登录
职称英语
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
游客
2024-02-17
45
管理
问题
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income students shows that a record number of the nation’s school districts will receive less in the coming academic year than they did for the one just ended.
For the 2005-2006 school year, spending under the Department of Education’s Title I program, which helps low-achieving children in high-poverty areas, is increasing by 3.2 percent, to $12.6 billion. But because of population shifts, growing numbers of poor children, newer census data and complex formulas that determine how the money is divided, more than two-thirds of the districts, or 8,843, will not receive as much financing as before.
The analysis, based on data from the department, was made by the Center on Education Policy, a group advocating for public schools. A similar study by the group last year showed that 55 percent of the schools would receive less money than they did in the previous year.
"It’s an alarming number," said Tom Fagan, a former department official who conducted the analysis. "It’s clear that the amount of overall increase is not keeping pace with the number of poor kids."
Susan Aspey, a department spokeswoman, defended the spending levels for Title I, saying, "President Bush and Congress have invested record amounts of funding to help the nation’s neediest students."
But Mr. Fagan said the increasing number of districts that are losing money is making it harder for the schools to meet the goals of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, the Bush administration’s signature education program, which measures progress through annual tests in math, reading and science. That is giving critics of the program more grounds to accuse the administration of not sufficiently financing the program while demanding greater results.
Title I provides the largest component of financing for No Child Left Behind.
"The federal government is concentrating more money in fewer districts," said John F. Jennings, the president and chief executive of the Center on Education Policy. "It means there is lots of anger and lots of tension. They’re asking us to do more and more with less and less." [br] Susan Aspey looks at the funding by the government with______.
选项
A、criticism
B、consent
C、indifference
D、expectation
答案
B
解析
观点态度题。本题考查文章人物的观点。苏珊·阿斯贝的观点态度只能从第5段推断出,从这一段中的defended和record amount of funding可知她对教育部的拨款数是认同的。选项A和C都是贬义词.不可能表达她的观点;选项D虽是褒义词,但苏珊是在陈述已发生的事实,而不是发表对教育部的期望。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3459497.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Nate:HeyPhil.HaveyoueverbeentoaJapanesepublicbath?Ih
______(没有一项发明获得如此多的表扬和批评)thanInternet.Noinventionhasreceivedmorepraiseand
InbothChinaandDenmarkchildrenare【S1】______andtheyreceiveagreatdea
InbothChinaandDenmarkchildrenare【S1】______andtheyreceiveagreatdea
InbothChinaandDenmarkchildrenare【S1】______andtheyreceiveagreatdea
InbothChinaandDenmarkchildrenare【S1】______andtheyreceiveagreatdea
[originaltext]M:Thenewmayorisreallyagoodpublicspeaker.Thespeechhed
[originaltext]M:Thenewmayorisreallyagoodpublicspeaker.Thespeechhed
[originaltext]M:Thenewmayorisreallyagoodpublicspeaker.Thespeechhed
[originaltext]M:Thenewmayorisreallyagoodpublicspeaker.Thespeechhed
随机试题
[img]2017m4s/ct_etoeicrm_etoeicryd_0346_201704[/img]ExploretheSco
______Ilikeverymuchtodoscience,asateacherIhavetogooverthestuden
Ifthecostofalong-distancephonecallisccentsforthefirstminuteand2/
Weshouldunderstandthenecessitythat____________(我们为这个项目贡献出力量).we(should)de
下列关于机体抗寄生虫感染的说法错误的是:A.机体免疫机制很难控制寄生虫感染,常引
甲、乙、丙三家公司组成联合体投标中标了一栋写字楼工程,施工过程中因甲施工的工程质
公积金管理中心基本职责不包括()。A.制定公积金信贷政策 B.负责信贷审
主要副作用为甲状腺改变的抗心律失常药物是A.地尔硫? B.索他洛尔 C.利多
转移支付的主要形式有()。A:工资支出B:补助支出C:捐赠支出D:投资支出
按税收的管理和使用权限为标准,税收可分为()。A.中央税 B.地方税 C.共
最新回复
(
0
)