首页
登录
职称英语
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?A)Some have called it a Ri
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?A)Some have called it a Ri
游客
2024-02-06
23
管理
问题
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?
A)Some have called it a Right to Die case. Others have labeled it a Right to Live case. One group of advocates has called for "death with dignity." Others have responded accusingly, "euthanasia".
B)At the center of the latest controversy about life and death, medicine and law, is a seventy-eight-year-old Massachusetts man whose existence hangs on a court order.
C)On one point, everyone agrees: Earle Spring is not the man he used to be. Once a strapping outdoorsman, he is now called senile by many, and mentally incompetent by the courts. He is, at worst, a member of living dead; at best, a shriveled version of his former self.
D)For more than two years, since his physical and then mental health began to deteriorate , Earle Spring has been kept alive by spending five hours on a kidney dialysis machine three times a week. Since January 1979, his family has pleaded to have him removed from the life-support system.
E)They believe deeply that he Earle Spring who was would not want to live as the Earle Spring who is. They believe they are advocates for the right to die in peace.
F)In the beginning, the court agrees. Possibly for the first time, they reeled last month in favor of withdrawing medical care from an elderly patient whose mind had deteriorated. The dialysis was stopped.
G)But then, in a sudden intervention, an outside nurse and doctor visited Earle Spring and testified that he was alert enough to "make a weak expression of his desire to live." And so the treatments were resumed.
H)Now, while the courts are waiting for new and more thorough evidence about Spring’ s mental state, the controversy rages about legal procedures; no judge ever visited Spring, no psychiatrist ever testified. And even more important, we are again forced to determine one person’ s right to die or to live.
I)This case makes the Karen Ann Quinlan story seem simple in comparison. Quinlan today hangs onto her "life" long after her "plug was pulled." But when the New Jersey court heard that case, Quinlan had no will. She had suffered brain death by any definition.
J)The Spring story is different. He is neither competent nor comatose. He lives in a gray area of consciousness. So the questions also range over the gray area of our consciences.
K)What should the relationship be between mental and physical treatment? Should we treat the incompetent as aggressively as the competent? Should we order heart surgery for one senile citizen? Should we take another off a kidney machine? Who is to decide?
L)Until recently, we didn’t have the technology to keep Earle Spring alive. Until recently, the-life-and-death decisions about the senile elderly or the retarded or the institutionalized were made privately between families and medical people. Now, increasingly, in States like Massachusetts, they are made publicly and legally.
M)Clearly there are no absolutes in this case. No right to die. No right to live. We have to take into account many social as well as medical factors. How much of the resources of a society or a family should be allotted to a member who no longer recognizes it? How many sacrifices should the healthy and vital make for the terminally or permanently ill and disabled?
N)In England, where kidney dialysis machines are scarce, Earle Spring would never have remained on one. In America, one Earle Spring can decimate the energy and income of an entire family.
O)But the Spring case is a crucial, scary one that could affect all those living under that dubious sentence "incompetent" or that shaky diagnosis "senile". So it seems to me that if there is any mental activity at all, then disconnecting him from life would be a dangerous precedent, far more dangerous than letting him continue.
P)The court ruled originally in favor of taking Spring off the machine. It ruled that this is what Earle Spring would have wanted. I have no doubt that his family believes it. I have no doubt of their affection or their pain.
Q)But I remember, too, what my grandfather used to say: No one wants to live to be one hundred until you ask the man who is ninety-nine. Well, no one, including Earle Spring, wants to live to be senile. But once senile, he may well want to live. We simply have to give him the benefit of the doubt. Any doubt. [br] Earle Spring depends on a kidney dialysis machine to sustain life.
选项
答案
D
解析
题干:厄尔·斯普林依靠肾透析来维持生命。题干关键词是kidney dialysis和sustain。文中D段第一句提到,自从厄尔·斯普林身体状况变差,接着又精神状况恶化的两年多以来,他都是靠每周做三次五个小时的肾透析来维持生命。与题干意思吻合,故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3427735.html
相关试题推荐
RecentlytheBarbicanmuseuminLondonheldanexhibitioncalledtheRainRo
RecentlytheBarbicanmuseuminLondonheldanexhibitioncalledtheRainRo
[originaltext]Peopleovertheageof65intheUSAarecalledseniorcitize
[originaltext]Peopleovertheageof65intheUSAarecalledseniorcitize
[originaltext]Route66wasonceveryfamousinAmerica.Ithasbeencalled
[originaltext]Route66wasonceveryfamousinAmerica.Ithasbeencalled
Topuniversitieshavebeencalledontopublishlistsof"banned"A-levels
Topuniversitieshavebeencalledontopublishlistsof"banned"A-levels
Topuniversitieshavebeencalledontopublishlistsof"banned"A-levels
Topuniversitieshavebeencalledontopublishlistsof"banned"A-levels
随机试题
Twentyyearsagothisweek,theBritishinventorTimBerners-Leecreatedthe
一种四聚体血红蛋白有一个空穴正好在其完全氧合的时候与一个杀虫剂分子结合。脱氧的血
同条件养护试件的拆模时间可与实际构件的拆模时间相同,拆模后,试件仍需保持同条件养
假设某公司营销系统有营销点关系S(营销点,负责人姓名,联系方式)、商品关系P(商
有限空间作业的危险因素主要包括缺氧窒息、中毒窒息、燃爆以及其他危险因素等。下列属
急性胰腺炎肝郁气滞证的治法是A.清肝利胆,泄浊畅中 B.疏肝利胆,行气止痛
对OGTT的看法正确的是A:OGTT对糖尿病的诊断是必需的,推荐临床常规应用B
上海的王先生每月工资不高,可是收入增长较快,现准备贷款买车,理财规划师结合市场上
A.补气益气,缓急止痛,润肺止咳 B.补气生津 C.补中益气,养血安神 D
公路施工中严禁使用的路基填筑材料是()。A.重粉质黏土 B.腐殖土 C.细
最新回复
(
0
)