首页
登录
职称英语
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
游客
2024-02-06
53
管理
问题
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really good science, it is impossible to predict. If the things to be found are actually new, they are by definition unknown in advance. You cannot make choices in this matter. You either have science or you don’t, and if you have it you are obliged to accept the surprising and disturbing pieces of information, along with the neat and promptly useful bits.
The only solid piece of scientific truth about which I feel totally confident is that we are profoundly ignorant about nature. Indeed, I regard this as the major discovery of the past hundred years of biology. It is, in its way, an illuminating piece of news. It would have amazed the brightest minds of the 18th century Enlightenment(启蒙运动)to be told by any of us how little we know and how bewildering(迷惑)seems the way ahead.
It is this sudden confrontation(对抗)with the depth and scope of ignorance that represents the most significant contribution of the 20th century science to the human intellect. In earlier times, we either pretended to understand how things worked or ignored the problem, or simply made up stories to fill the gaps. Now that we have begun exploring in earnest, we are getting glimpses of how huge the questions are, and how far from being answered. Because of this, we are depressed. It is not so bad being ignorant if you are totally ignorant; the hard thing is knowing in some detail the reality of ignorance, the worst spots and here and there the not-so-bad spots, but no true light at the end of the tunnel nor even any tunnels that can yet be trusted.
But we are making a beginning, and there ought to be some satisfaction. There are probably no questions we can think up that can’t be answered, sooner or later, including even the matter of consciousness. To be sure, there may well be questions we can’t think up, ever, and therefore limits to the reach of human intellect, but that is another matter. Within our limits, we should be able to work our way through to all our answers, if we keep at it long enough, and pay attention. [br] The author’s attitude towards science is______.
选项
A、negative
B、confident
C、depressed
D、doubtful
答案
B
解析
推断题。文中最后一段第一句提到,But we are making a beginning,andthere ought to be some satisfaction,接下来又提到,可能遇到的困难;最后一句提到,we should be able to work our way through to all our answers。可见作者对科技的发展是很有信心的,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3426576.html
相关试题推荐
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
Thepredictabilityofourmortalityratesissomethingthathaslongpuzzled
Thepredictabilityofourmortalityratesissomethingthathaslongpuzzled
Thepredictabilityofourmortalityratesissomethingthathaslongpuzzled
Thepredictabilityofourmortalityratesissomethingthathaslongpuzzled
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreally
Averyinterestingandimportantdevelopmentinscienceisadevicecalledl
Averyinterestingandimportantdevelopmentinscienceisadevicecalledl
随机试题
AlphaZeroseemstoexpressinsight.Itplayslikenocomputereverhas,intu
TheParisAirShowbroughtAirbus425bookingsworthtensofbillionsofdoll
______areamongthemostinfluentialnewspapersin______.A、WashingtonPostand
CrossCulturalNegotiationsIt’simportanttounderstandtheculturaldifference
Ifyoutrytodotoomanythingsatthesametime,you______(将以一事无成而告终).willend
在运用抽样时,标准离差衡量的是:A.预期差错率。 B.期望的置信水平。 C.
以下关于舌癌(如图)的叙述,哪项是错误的() A.舌根部癌可向茎突
免疫散射比浊法的说法不正确的是A.散射光强度与颗粒的分子量、数目、大小及入射光强
行政领导者通过一定方式在组织与外部环境之间,组织内部各单位之间,组织的成员之间建
高速铁路线路路堤坡脚、路堑坡顶或者铁路桥梁外侧起向外各()m范围内禁止抽取地下水
最新回复
(
0
)