首页
登录
职称英语
For decades, biobanking has been held up as an essential research tool. Whil
For decades, biobanking has been held up as an essential research tool. Whil
游客
2024-01-30
54
管理
问题
For decades, biobanking has been held up as an essential research tool. While few doubt the scientific value of having catalogues of well-characterized tissues, cells, and other samples, these research platforms have also generated a significant amount of legal and moral controversy, especially in the context of consent and the control of research samples.
Throughout the world, billions of public and private dollars have been invested in biobanks and millions of individuals have been asked to donate biological material and personal information. But, at the same time, there remains deep uncertainty about fundamental legal and moral norms.
Legal scholars have argued that the most commonly used form of consent—that is, broad or open consent—does not adhere to relevant legal norms, which would seem to require a more comprehensive and specific approach to the consent process. Because the details of future work cannot be known, this approach means providing research participants with far less information than is traditionally disclosed (披露) in the case of specific consent.
It is true that many studies have consistently found that, for the most part, the public supports biobanking initiatives and trusts the research community. But that support and trust are fragile. There are many social forces, such as the increasing involvement of industry in biobanking initiatives, which could erode public confidence. In addition, there are a number of social trends that may heighten public interest in the control of human biological material. Research ethics controversies can have a profound effect on public perceptions and consent policy.
An emerging interest in biorights, though not widespread, could also challenge the existing approaches of biobanking. Indeed, areas such as genetics (遗传学) and stem cell research receive a great deal of positive coverage in the popular press, including reference to the economic potential of the work.
Within the scientific community it has become widely accepted that biobanks are an indispensable research tool, essential for picking out complex gene-environment interactions. There is little doubt that biobanking is here to stay. But we need to recognize that despite decades of academic debate, fundamental legal and moral challenges remain. [br] What is one of the disadvantages of broad consent comparing to specific consent?
选项
A、It follows more approaches.
B、It requires more participants.
C、It reveals less information.
D、It conforms to fewer legal norms.
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。定位句提到,由于未来工作的细节是未知的,因此这种方法(广泛或公开的同意)意味着为研究参与者提供的信息远远少于在具体同意的情况下传统披露的信息,故答案为C)。A)“它遵循多种方法”,从文中可知,公开的同意只是一种方法,不涉及其他,故排除;B)“它需要更多的参与者”,文中只提到为研究参与者提供信息,并没有提到人数的多少,故排除;D)“它遵循更少的法律规范”,第三段首句提到法律学者认为,最常用的同意形式——即广泛或公开的同意——并没有遵守相关的法律规范,与规范多少无关,可以排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3406294.html
相关试题推荐
I’musuallyfairlyskepticalaboutanyresearchthatconcludesthatpeoplea
Inthe1960s,medicalresearchersThomasHolmesandRichardRahedevelopeda
Inthe1960s,medicalresearchersThomasHolmesandRichardRahedevelopeda
Inthe1960s,medicalresearchersThomasHolmesandRichardRahedevelopeda
HowsciencegoeswrongScientificresearchhaschang
HowsciencegoeswrongScientificresearchhaschang
HowsciencegoeswrongScientificresearchhaschang
HowsciencegoeswrongScientificresearchhaschang
HowsciencegoeswrongScientificresearchhaschang
HowsciencegoeswrongScientificresearchhaschang
随机试题
Populationageingandtheresultingpressuresonexistingpensionsystemsc
最后,他激励了我在华盛顿成功地开创了自己的公司。(motivation)Eventually,itgavemethemotivationtosta
[originaltext]BrianarrivedattheSanFranciscoairporttwohoursbeforet
Readthefollowing: 1.Needed:Fulltime
沙赫特实验有关凝聚力与生产率关系的条件结果说明,无论凝聚力高低,积极诱导都提高了
宫内节育器避孕原理是A.阻止精子进入宫腔及输卵管 B.干扰下丘脑-垂体-卵巢轴
Today,only4millionpeopleliveandwor
基础心理学是研究()。 (A)正常成人心理现象的心理学基础学科 (B
患者,男,3年前行全口修复,使用1年后,一颗人工牙完整脱落,同时发现吃食物费力,
地下35/0.4kV变电所由两路电源供电,低压侧单母线分段,采用TN-C-S接地
最新回复
(
0
)