首页
登录
职称英语
Can Burglars Jam Your Wireless Security System?A)Any product th
Can Burglars Jam Your Wireless Security System?A)Any product th
游客
2024-01-28
30
管理
问题
Can Burglars Jam Your Wireless Security System?
A)Any product that promises to protect your home deserves careful examination. So it isn’t surprising that you’ll find plenty of strong opinions about the potential vulnerabilities of popular home-security systems.
B)The most likely type of burglary(入室盗窃)by far is the unsophisticated crime of opportunity, usually involving a broken window or some forced entry. According to the FBI, crimes like these accounted for roughly two-thirds of all household burglaries in the US in 2013. The wide majority of the rest were illegal, unforced entries that resulted from something like a window being left open. The odds of a criminal using technical means to bypass a security system are so small that the FBI doesn’t even track those statistics.
C)One of the main theoretical home-security concerns is whether or not a given system is vulnerable to being blocked from working altogether. With wired setups, the fear is that a burglar(入室盗贼)might be able to shut your system down simply by cutting the right cable. With a wireless setup, you stick battery-powered sensors up around your home that keep an eye on windows, doors, motion, and more. If they detect something wrong while the system is armed, they’ll transmit a wireless alert signal to a base station that will then raise the alarm. That approach will eliminate most cord-cutting concerns—but what about their wireless equivalent, jamming? With the right device tuned to the right frequency, what’s to stop a thief from jamming your setup and blocking that alert signal from ever reaching the base station?
D)Jamming concerns are nothing new, and they’re not unique to security systems. Any device that’s built to receive a wireless signal at a specific frequency can be overwhelmed by a stronger signal coming in on the same frequency. For comparison, let’s say you wanted to "jam" a conversation between two people—all you’d need to do is yell in the listener’s ear.
E)Security devices are required to list the frequencies they broadcast on—that means that a potential thief can find what they need to know with minimal Googling. They will, however, need to know what system they’re looking for. If you have a sign in your yard declaring what setup you use, that’d point them in the right direction, though at that point, we’re talking about a highly targeted, semi-sophisticated attack, and not the sort of forced-entry attack that makes up the majority of burglaries. It’s easier to find and acquire jamming equipment for some frequencies than it is for others.
F)Wireless security providers will often take steps to help combat the threat of jamming attacks. SimpliSafe, winner of our Editors’ Choice distinction, utilizes a special system that’s capable of separating incidental RF interference from targeted jamming attacks. When the system thinks it’s being jammed, it’ll notify you via push alert(推送警报). From there, it’s up to you to sound the alarm manually.
G)SimpliSafe was singled out in one recent article on jamming, complete with a video showing the entire system being effectively bypassed with handheld jamming equipment. After taking appropriate measures to contain the RF interference to our test lab, we tested the attack out for ourselves, and were able to verify that it’s possible with the right equipment. However, we also verified that SimpliSafe’s anti-jamming system works. It caught us in the act, sent an alert to my smartphone, and also listed our RF interference on the system’s event log. The team behind the article and video in question make no mention of the system, or whether or not it detected them.
H)We like the unique nature of that software. It means that a thief likely wouldn’t be able to Google how the system works, then figure out a way around it. Even if they could, SimpliSafe claims that its system is always evolving, and that it varies slightly from system to system, which means there wouldn’t be a universal magic formula for cracking it. Other systems also seem confident on the subject of jamming. The team at Frontpoint addresses the issue in a blog on its site, citing their own jam protection software and claiming that there aren’t any documented cases of a successful jam attack since the company began offering wireless security sensors in the 1980s.
I)Jamming attacks are absolutely possible. As said before, with the right equipment and the right know-how, it’s possible to jam any wireless transmission. But how probable is it that someone will successfully jam their way into your home and steal your stuff?
J)Let’s imagine that you live in a small home with a wireless security setup that offers a functional antijamming system. First, a thief is going to need to target your home, specifically. Then, he’s going to need to know the technical details of your system and acquire the specific equipment necessary for jamming your specific setup. Presumably, you keep your doors locked at night and while you’re away, so the thief will still need to break in. That means defeating the lock somehow, or breaking a window. He’ll need to be jamming you at this point, as a broken window or opened door would normally release the alarm. So, too, would the motion detectors in your home, so the thief will need to continue jamming once he’s inside and searching for things to steal. However, he’ll need to do so without tripping the anti-jamming system, the details of which he almost certainly does not have access to.
K)At the end of the day, these kinds of systems are primarily designed to protect against the sort of opportunistic smash-and-grab attack that makes up the majority of burglaries. They’re also only a single layer in what should ideally be a many-sided approach to securing your home, one that includes common sense things like sound locks and proper exterior lighting at night. No system is impenetrable, and none can promise to eliminate the worst case completely. Every one of them has vulnerabilities that a knowledgeable thief could theoretically exploit. A good system is one that keeps that worst-case setting as improbable as possible while also offering strong protection in the event of a less-extraordinary attack. [br] A burglar has to continuously jam the wireless security device to avoid triggering the alarm, both inside and outside the house.
选项
答案
J
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.tihaiku.com/zcyy/3401651.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Theworldwillneedtodoublefoodproductionwithinthenext
[originaltext]Theworldwillneedtodoublefoodproductionwithinthenext
随着生活水平的提高,保健品(healthcareproducts)日益受到中国人的喜爱。人们花费大量金钱来购买能量饮料、维生素药片和美容饮品。这些保
科举制(imperialexaminationsystem)是中国古代朝廷(imperialgovernment)选拔官员的制度。它始于隋朝(th
Directions:Manypeopletrytobuythenewestproductstosatisfytheirdesi
在中国,交通安全是一个难题。据公安部(theMinistryofPublicSecurity)统计,去年有6.2万人死于交通事故。最近出台的新交
杭州特产众多,其中以丝绸和茶叶最受欢迎。Hangzhouboastsnumerousspeciallocalproducts,amongwhich
[originaltext][3]Wasteproductsfromapopularalcoholicdrinkcouldbeuse
[originaltext]Iraqilawmakersareexpectedtovoteonthesecurityagreement
GPSA)TheGlobalPositioningSystemisa.space-basedtriangulationsys
随机试题
TheSupremeCourt’sdecisionsonphysician-assistedsuicidecarryimportant
对于单个股票的β系数来说()。A、β系数大于1时,说明单个股票的波动或风险程度低于以指数衡量的整个市场B、β系数大于1时,说明单个股票的波动或风险程度
哪个不是乔纳森巴奈特在《作为公共政策的城市设计》中提出的观点?( )A.日常决
男性,43岁,因车祸致右股骨干骨折,大量出血伴休克,处理措施中不正确的是A.固定
(2013年)在GIS系统详细设计阶段,需展开的工作有()。A.确
有一位于9度抗震设防区、设计基本地震加速度值为0.40g,设计地震分组为第一组,
下列有关《钦定宪法大纲》的说法,正确的是()。A.重心在于维护君主大权 B.具
证券交易所应当建立(),并根据证券法规的规定或者证券会的要求,限制或禁止特定证券
网上发行大大减轻了发行组织工作压力,为社会节省了大量的人力、物力和财力资源。这一
下列属于验槽前的准备工作的有( )。A.察看结构说明和地质勘查报告,对比结构设计
最新回复
(
0
)